Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Should seeding be abolished?

  • 14-06-2015 6:02pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭


    So for the likes of European qualifying and World Cup qualifying Europe seeds it's teams to keep the large ones safe from meeting and basically guarantee that they make it to these tournaments.

    I think really everybody should be given a fair a chance and seeding should be gotten rid of. The likelihood of a group of France Germany Portugal Spain Holland and England is still very unlikely and I still don't see San Marino making the finals.


Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nah


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Icaras


    France Germany Portugal Spain Holland and England have a larger fan base, therefore more tv viewers, therefore more €€€€ for fifa/uefa. its all about the money


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭Dozen Wicked Words


    Icaras wrote: »
    France Germany Portugal Spain Holland and England have a larger fan base, therefore more tv viewers, therefore more €€€€ for fifa/uefa. its all about the money

    It's all about past performance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Icaras


    It's all about past performance.

    well that too, so we're agreed money and past performance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭bpb101


    firstly if your talking about our group we were second seed in that btw

    Yes and no

    Is there much sense in sending san mario into the finals to be the whipping boys.
    I would be more in favor of a more generalized seeding
    top 30 teams in pot 1 , 30-60 in pot2 60-90 in pot 3 , 2 teams from each or something along them lines

    for the finals , all would be fair in love and war though


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,725 ✭✭✭✭blueser


    Icaras wrote: »
    France Germany Portugal Spain Holland and England have a larger fan base, therefore more tv viewers, therefore more €€€€ for fifa/uefa. its all about the money
    Bang on the money there, if you pardon the pun. I can't imagine that UEFA's advertising "partners" would be too impressed if there was any risk of any of the glamour sides not getting there. Screwing up in a qualifying campaign is one thing; to have, however remote the chance, 3 of the big nations grouped together would be a no-no.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    But thanks to the likes of England getting a handy group is they will move up the rankings and sadly we can see England really ain't that good a team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,725 ✭✭✭✭blueser


    JamboMac wrote: »
    But thanks to the likes of England getting a handy group is they will move up the rankings and sadly we can see England really ain't that good a team.
    While in theory you are correct, you're sort of missing the point raised by myself and a few others on here. The mega companies that are in bed with UEFA want the "bigger" nations there, as that means more exposure for their brand. If you were the CEO of, say, MacDonald's, who would you prefer to see playing a match in a stadium with your billboards around the edge of the pitch; England/Germany/Spain/Italy etc or San Marino/Faroe Islands/Cyprus/Gibraltar etc? I'm afraid that football isn't just a sport any more, it's big business. Harsh, but true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,066 ✭✭✭Washington Irving


    bpb101 wrote: »
    firstly if your talking about our group we were second seed in that btw

    Yes and no

    Is there much sense in sending san mario into the finals to be the whipping boys.
    I would be more in favor of a more generalized seeding
    top 30 teams in pot 1 , 30-60 in pot2 60-90 in pot 3 , 2 teams from each or something along them lines

    for the finals , all would be fair in love and war though

    This would be the best compromise imo. Having a seedless free-for-all would be a complete mess and would be just as unfair as the current system.

    For the finals themselves, there should be no seeding. Every team there was good enough to qualify so should be given the same chance to advance through the group and not be fcuked over by further seeding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    blueser wrote: »
    While in theory you are correct, you're sort of missing the point raised by myself and a few others on here. The mega companies that are in bed with UEFA want the "bigger" nations there, as that means more exposure for their brand. If you were the CEO of, say, MacDonald's, who would you prefer to see playing a match in a stadium with your billboards around the edge of the pitch; England/Germany/Spain/Italy etc or San Marino/Faroe Islands/Cyprus/Gibraltar etc? I'm afraid that football isn't just a sport any more, it's big business. Harsh, but true.

    No I do see everybody's point regarding big companies, but I still wouldn't see the really small nations getting through. See I don't see the point in saying lets make football fairer and then go but we have to guarantee these teams make the tournament.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭Adamcp898


    Lads it's not just about making big money, seeding is also there to preserve the quality of football at the actual tournamnet.

    Picture a group with Spain, England, Germany, and France where two teams don't go; then picture the group with Moldova, San Marino, Andorra, and Lichenstein where two teams do go then.

    The end result would make the group stages of the actual competition itself completely pointless and it wouldn't be entertaining until the quarter final stage at least.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,483 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Every Confederation apart from South America seeds qualification it is not a European thing.

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    Adamcp898 wrote: »
    Lads it's not just about making big money, seeding is also there to preserve the quality of football at the actual tournamnet.

    Picture a group with Spain, England, Germany, and France where two teams don't go; then picture the group with Moldova, San Marino, Andorra, and Lichenstein where two teams do go then.

    The end result would make the group stages of the actual competition itself completely pointless and it wouldn't be entertaining until the quarter final stage at least.

    In recent tournaments 3 of those big teams haven't shown up at times and quality was well below what is expected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭Adamcp898


    JamboMac wrote: »
    In recent tournaments 3 of those big teams haven't shown up at times and quality was well below what is expected.

    Yep exactly, the quality and importance of international football has been in decline for a while. This would only serve to exacerbate it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    Adamcp898 wrote: »
    Yep exactly, the quality and importance of international football has been in decline for a while. This would only serve to exacerbate it.

    How would it see the quality of football decrease at a rapid rate, some of the little teams have clearly improved going by some of the results over the last couple of days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭Adamcp898


    JamboMac wrote: »
    How would it see the quality of football decrease at a rapid rate, some of the little teams have clearly improved going by some of the results over the last couple of days.

    Some have, some have not. Expanding the tournament already will see more weaker teams at the Euro's and it's not that long since the last WC expansion. Adding in more poor teams will only dilute the quality further.

    Think of how many games in the qualification stage are forgone conclusions and not worth watching unless you have a vested interest, then think of having a few of those at the actual tournament. Like I say, it could make the group stages pointless and a glorified warm-up for the big teams that do go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,483 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    European system is a lot fairer than some.

    Look at North America and Asia they have already started their qualification process for the 2018 World Cup, to make sure that the same 4 or 5 teams go to the World Cup

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    European system is a lot fairer than some.

    Look at North America and Asia they have already started their qualification process for the 2018 World Cup, to make sure that the same 4 or 5 teams go to the World Cup

    Is it not FIFA who set out how qualifying for the World Cup is accomplished whereas the confederation are in charge of their cup, if we want corruption gone from football that doesn't just mean sepp Blatter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,725 ✭✭✭✭blueser


    Adamcp898 wrote: »
    Some have, some have not. Expanding the tournament already will see more weaker teams at the Euro's and it's not that long since the last WC expansion. Adding in more poor teams will only dilute the quality further.

    Think of how many games in the qualification stage are forgone conclusions and not worth watching unless you have a vested interest, then think of having a few of those at the actual tournament. Like I say, it could make the group stages pointless and a glorified warm-up for the big teams that do go.
    Agreed. We need less quantity, more quality. Watch any world cup finals tournament; a lot of the group stage matches are poor, and I would imagine that the increased numbers in France next summer will hardly improve the overall quality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭Adamcp898


    JamboMac wrote: »
    Is it not FIFA who set out how qualifying for the World Cup is accomplished whereas the confederation are in charge of their cup, if we want corruption gone from football that doesn't just mean sepp Blatter.

    Nope, each confederation organises it's WC qualifying format.

    The South American one is quite good, everyone plays each other twice, but obviously isn't practical for the bigger confederations.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    Adamcp898 wrote: »
    Nope, each confederation organises it's qualifying format.

    The South American one is quite, everyone plays each other twice, but obviously isn't practical for the bigger confederations.

    Unless you divided Europe into 4 groups of random picked teams, the big teams should still get through, but I think fairer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,606 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    JamboMac wrote: »
    So for the likes of European qualifying and World Cup qualifying Europe seeds it's teams to keep the large ones safe from meeting and basically guarantee that they make it to these tournaments.

    I think really everybody should be given a fair chance

    Which teams or tiers are being given an 'unfair chance' at the moment and thus need a fair chance? Surely its currently a highly merit based system where depending on performance a team like Ireland can move from number 1 seeds to (nearly) number 4 seeds and hopefully back again in the space of a few campaigns?
    Which other sports and their nonseeded qualification systems would you like to base it on (clue : no other sports follow your ideas).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,483 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    JamboMac wrote: »
    Is it not FIFA who set out how qualifying for the World Cup is accomplished whereas the confederation are in charge of their cup, if we want corruption gone from football that doesn't just mean sepp Blatter.

    Yea and in those confederations qualification for their cup is sometimes tied in with World Cup qualification.

    The Asian Cup in 2019 qualification is being decided now in this early group stage of qualification.

    Group winners go into the Asian Cup and onto the 3rd round of World Cup qualification, then it goes haywire after that, 2nd placed teams go into the 3rd round of world cup qualification and maybe into the Asian cup and some into another qualification round for the Asian Cup.

    Teams 3rd to 5th go into more qualification rounds for the Asian Cup

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    It's all about past performance.

    Its not that simple. There are some very average teams with high seedings.

    You get a high seeding, and therefore get an easy group. You win all your games because its an easy group with no decent teams in it.....and maintain your high seeding. Which means you get an easy group next time. And so on.

    It's a bit of a loop. Ranking needs to be more heavily weighted. Beating Germany should give you a hell of a lot more ranking points than beat Gibraltar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Beefy78


    Kirby wrote: »
    Its not that simple. There are some very average teams with high seedings.

    You get a high seeding, and therefore get an easy group. You win all your games because its an easy group with no decent teams in it.....and maintain your high seeding. Which means you get an easy group next time. And so on.

    It's a bit of a loop. Ranking needs to be more heavily weighted. Beating Germany should give you a hell of a lot more ranking points than beat Gibraltar.

    Beating Germany does give you a hell of a lot more ranking points than beating Gibraltar.

    Seems like a lot of sour grapes in this thread, tbh. Wales have shown that the seedlings are nothing that cannot be overcome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,483 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    The rankings will be updated before the draw next month but if the draw was tomorrow here is the seeded for UEFA World Cup qualification

    Pot 1
    1 Germany
    2 Belgium
    3 Netherlands
    4 Portugal
    5 France
    6 Spain
    7 Switzerland
    8 Romania
    9 Italy

    Pot 2
    10 England
    11 Czech Republic
    12 Slovakia
    13 Croatia
    14 Austria
    15 Wales
    16 Greece
    17 Scotland
    18 Denmark

    Pot 3
    19 Bosnia and Herzegovina
    20 Poland
    21 Ukraine
    22 Iceland
    23 Sweden
    24 Israel
    25 Hungary
    26 Northern Ireland
    27 Serbia

    Pot 4
    28 Slovenia
    29 Albania
    30 Turkey
    31 Republic of Ireland
    32 Bulgaria
    33 Norway
    34 Montenegro
    35 Finland
    36 Belarus

    Pot 5
    37 Latvia
    38 Armenia
    39 Cyprus
    40 Estonia
    41 Lithuania
    42 FYR Macedonia
    43 Faroe Islands
    44 Azerbaijan
    45 Moldova

    Pot 6
    46 Liechtenstein
    47 Luxembourg
    48 Kazakhstan
    49 Georgia
    50 Malta
    51 San Marino
    52 Andorra

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,483 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Beefy78 wrote: »
    Beating Germany does give you a hell of a lot more ranking points than beating Gibraltar.

    Seems like a lot of sour grapes in this thread, tbh. Wales have shown that the seedlings are nothing that cannot be overcome.

    There is no FIFA points for beating Gibraltar as they are not a FIFA team.

    UEFA have there own ranking system compared to FIFA.

    UEFA ranking system is used for Euro qualification and FIFA ranking is used for World Cup qualification

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,725 ✭✭✭✭blueser


    Beefy78 wrote: »
    Beating Germany does give you a hell of a lot more ranking points than beating Gibraltar.

    Seems like a lot of sour grapes in this thread, tbh. Wales have shown that the seedlings are nothing that cannot be overcome.
    Iceland also punching well above their current ranking a the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Beefy78


    Yeah fair point but Gibraltar are a one off. Point is the rankings are weighted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Beefy78 wrote: »
    Yeah fair point but Gibraltar are a one off. Point is the rankings are weighted.

    We know that. Hence the words "More heavily weighted" in my post. :rolleyes:

    The fact is, beating a germany or brazil once, should be the equivalent to beating a minnow 7 or 8 times. And its not. Which is why you have seen some ridiculous ranking anomalies over the years. You are better off hammering a few minnows than grinding out hard fought draws against the big teams. Aand there is something fundamentally broken about that system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Yes for qualification but no for tournaments.

    I think the likes of the champions league is ridiculously over-seeded and geo-blocked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭Mousewar


    Seeding is fine when you do it once but when you do it twice in the one qualification process it becomes corrupt. For the 2010 World Cup qualifiers, Ireland were seeded in the third group but exceeded their seeding by finishing 2nd and going into the playoffs with seven other teams. Despite the advantage of being top seeds, teams like France, Portugal and Greece also found themselves in the playoffs. So, Ireland, along with Slovenia, Ukraine and Bosnia had, despite the disadvantage of being lower seeds, achieved the same as France, Portugal and Greece. The reward should have therefore been the same - equal status in the playoff. Yet, Fifa decided to do another round of seeding and in so doing gave the 'bigger' countries a second advantage. Fifa's determination to see the 'bigger' countries make it to the Finals and their disregard for smaller nations was never more stark than in that event.
    B*stards.


Advertisement