Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Photos of Russia's abandoned space shuttles

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,729 ✭✭✭martinsvi


    GVHOT wrote: »
    http://ralphmirebs.livejournal.com/219949.html

    Wow they really just cut and dumped these.

    the hangar pictured there is in Kazakhstan - Baikonur Cosmodrome. Since the Buran project really just took off as the union was about to collapse, the project was stopped with only one of the shuttles ever seeing Space. Shortly after the collapse, neither Kazakhstan nor Russia had the money to continue the project and later the whole facility was hit by a powerful storm, rendering the appalling scenes in the pictures. Obviously Buran was pretty much a copy of NASA's space shuttle, and with it's future looking dodgy in early 2000nd's, no one really had any motivation to pick these things up from the dust


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,231 ✭✭✭MuffinsDa


    Cool.

    also ere's some really awesome Russian steam punk goodness - Caspian Sea Monster: http://igor113.livejournal.com/51213.html#cutid1

    I'd love that in my garden.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,310 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    All that money!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Excellent photos..... but sad to look at :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 706 ✭✭✭Lockheed


    Fascinating and sad. I woner what it would take to get in there to look at the shuttles.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,730 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    The level of engineering just on the hanger is staggering, sad to see it lying idle going to waste.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,167 ✭✭✭TopTec


    Would love to read the translated version of those article... fascinating.

    TT


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭coolperson05


    Anyone else think it would be an amazing movie set?? Russian's could make some extra money renting it to the next Bond crew!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,730 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    TopTec wrote: »
    Would love to read the translated version of those article... fascinating.

    TT

    Google Translate gives the basics https://translate.google.ie/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fralphmirebs.livejournal.com%2F219949.html&edit-text=


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭ned14


    TopTec wrote: »
    Would love to read the translated version of those article... fascinating.

    TT

    Open the link in Chrome. On the right side of the address bar there's an option to translate the page. Fascinating reading!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 349 ✭✭St. Leibowitz


    There's one of these in the Technik Museum Speyer in Germany. The two technical museums, Sinshim and Speyer, are a short drive apart, and well worth a visit. Some fantastic exhibits.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    martinsvi wrote: »
    ..... Obviously Buran was pretty much a copy of NASA's space shuttle, and with it's future looking dodgy in early 2000nd's, no one really had any motivation to pick these things up from the dust
    While it was a copy it was 'better' in some respects. It could carry more cargo than the US shuttle, and it was capable of being 'flown' by ground control. However the fact that it was an ultimately unsuccesful project makes the US program the 'better' one.

    I was lucky enough to get inside one of the prototypes (OK-GLI) approx 14 years ago in Sydney harbour. Got interior tour and access to the cockpit. (They used standard MIG-25 seats and control yokes for the flight crew)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,064 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Their equivalent of the Solid Rocket Boosters were way way better than the American ones too. They could be switched off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭thecommander


    Tenger wrote: »
    While it was a copy it was 'better' in some respects. It could carry more cargo than the US shuttle, and it was capable of being 'flown' by ground control. However the fact that it was an ultimately unsuccesful project makes the US program the 'better' one.

    100% success rate too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭Davidth88


    I saw this on top of the AN226 at Paris Airshow back in the 80's

    I was hunting for the photos I took , if I find one Ill scan it and throw it up


Advertisement