Who wants to be offended?

AndonHandon

It is a tragic reality that we have descended into a similar state to the U.S. when the entire yes vote campaign was based around perceived injustice; campaigners were craving to be outraged by somebody spouting 'no' to their hissyfit yes proclamation.

And in AH, often when there is a thread on the likes of a woman getting a few weeks hard labour in the kitchen for sowing her man's jap's eye shut and feeding him his testicles; the comment "if the roles were reversed imagine the outrage".

I'm not sure if there is a specific way to phrase it but this excitement at being outraged is baffling and disgusting.

Drew a penis jizzing onto a turban instead of an X, for the record.

Autonomous Cowherd

Uh. That's weird.

AndonHandon

Autonomous Cowherd wrote: »

Uh. That's weird.

Cowherd.

Autonomous Cowherd

AndonHandon wrote: »

Cowherd.

Hand On.

AndonHandon

Autonomous Cowherd wrote: »

Hand On.

Hand on my pussy while I suffocate you.

/gobblegobble

anncoates

Decries taking offence.

Persistently - and badly - courts offence.

AndonHandon

anncoates wrote: »

Decries taking offence.

Persistently - and badly - courts offence.

Go on . . .

Autonomous Cowherd

I occasionally wonder where is the place on boards.ie to report posts. It is not obvious to me.

retro:electro

If you're so disgusted why did you spoil your vote?

galljga1

AndonHandon wrote: »

It is a tragic reality that we have descended into a similar state to the U.S. when the entire yes vote campaign was based around perceived injustice; campaigners were craving to be outraged by somebody spouting 'no' to their hissyfit yes proclamation.

And in AH, often when there is a thread on the likes of a woman getting a few weeks hard labour in the kitchen for sowing her man's jap's eye shut and feeding him his testicles; the comment "if the roles were reversed imagine the outrage".

I'm not sure if there is a specific way to phrase it but this excitement at being outraged is baffling and disgusting.

Drew a penis jizzing onto a turban instead of an X, for the record.

Quite simply: what?

Cold War Kid

AndonHandon wrote: »

Drew a penis jizzing onto a turban instead of an X, for the record.

ur so kule brah

libelula

Tough Titties OP

YES YES YES

AndonHandon

anna080 wrote: »

If you're so disgusted why did you spoil your vote?

Did I?

I voted yes btw, to both; but the point still stands on people wanting to be outraged.

aaronjumper

I'm so angry at this thread and the OP. Grrrrrr arrrrrrgh.

retro:electro

AndonHandon wrote: »

Did I?

I voted yes btw, to both; but the point still stands on people wanting to be outraged.

I don't think anyone actually wants to be outraged tbh; it's just a natural reaction when you're up against bigoted lobbyists

anncoates

AndonHandon wrote: »

Go on . . .

The wife swapping sodomites have won.

Don't let the door of history hit you on the way out

Autonomous Cowherd

anncoates wrote: »

The wife swapping sodomites have won.

Don't let the door of history hit you on the way out

Goodness! I did not know we had voted in wife-swapping They kept that under wraps. (I'm outraged).

Cold War Kid

AndonHandon wrote: »

Did I?

You drew a picture of a penis ejaculating on a turban, you claim. That would... constitute vote-spoiling, yus.

I voted yes btw, to both; but the point still stands on people wanting to be outraged.

So ****ing what? People want to be outraged in all sorts of contexts, including ones that aren't in defence of a "liberal" view.
Most people just wanted people to have the right to marry, rather than not having the right to marry just because of how they happen to be orientated. "Waaaah, people wanted to be outraged" is neither here nor there.

Cold War Kid

Autonomous Cowherd wrote: »

Goodness! I did not know we had voted in wife-swapping They kept that under wraps. (I'm outraged).

Small boys will now be forced into arranged marriages with gay men. Men and women can never marry ever again.

I heard actually of one element of the lunatic fringe trying to persuade a no vote via saying sex education in schools will have to be about bum-****ing if this passes. :pac:

(Disclaimer: not attacking all no voters btw or deeming them all homophobes - my parents probably voted no).

cloud493

I love having something to have a good moan about personally.

Autonomous Cowherd

cloud493 wrote: »

I love having something to have a good moan about personally.

Ya dirty yoke, ya.

longshanks

What's going on here?

Cold War Kid

longshanks wrote: »

What's going on here?

Someone's "Doing a Stephen Fry" - bitching about people getting offended, while looking pretty darn offended themselves.

Autonomous Cowherd

Cold War Kid wrote: »

Small boys will now be forced into arranged marriages with gay men. Men and women can never marry ever again.

I heard actually of one element of the lunatic fringe trying to persuade a no vote via saying sex education in schools will have to be about bum-****ing if this passes. :pac:

(Disclaimer: not attacking all no voters btw or deeming them all homophobes - my parents probably voted no).

I could be wrong here...and stepping warily. But it kind of boils down to that doesnt it. Bum holes. When the thing is as far as I can make out many homosexuals do not particularly go in for anal sex, and many heterosexuals do (40% of under 30's i saw in one survey). So, it's all kind of passe now. The faux alarm at bottom holes being rifled.

I was discussing the referendum with a young male friend of mine who is gay and he trotted along to the topic of trying to persuade his partner to go on top/bottom (when there was I thinking this was automatic preference not a negotiation thing...but anyways..) I said well look it I don't talk graphically about their sex lives with other friends in general so spare me the details, I'm not gonna start with you. It's all just sex at the end of the day. Without the right lighting, sound track, good angles and body oil everyone elses sex looks a bit ewwww. lol

AndonHandon

Cold War Kid wrote: »

You drew a picture of a penis ejaculating on a turban, you claim. That would... constitute vote-spoiling, yus.

So ****ing what? People want to be outraged in all sorts of contexts, including ones that aren't in defence of a "liberal" view.
Most people just wanted people to have the right to marry, rather than not having the right to marry just because of how they happen to be orientated. "Waaaah, people wanted to be outraged" is neither here nor there.

Marry a turd if it makes you happy.

AndonHandon

Autonomous Cowherd wrote: »

I could be wrong here...and stepping warily. But it kind of boils down to that doesnt it. Bum holes. When the thing is as far as I can make out many homosexuals do not particularly go in for anal sex, and many heterosexuals do (40% of under 30's i saw in one survey). So, it's all kind of passe now. The faux alarm at bottom holes being rifled.

I was discussing the referendum with a young male friend of mine who is gay and he trotted along to the topic of trying to persuade his partner to go on top/bottom (when there was I thinking this was automatic preference not a negotiation thing...but anyways..) I said well look it I don't talk graphically about their sex lives with other friends in general so spare me the details, I'm not gonna start with you. It's all just sex at the end of the day. Without the right lighting, sound track, good angles and body oil everyone elses sex looks a bit ewwww. lol

I've been thinking; if it's anal sex then all humans have anal orifices so why would one stick to only adult males with assholes?

retro:electro

Op, you're really weird.

GLaDOS

Yeah, this isn't going anywhere good