Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Etihad and Emirates over Arabian Sea

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Doesn't give any other details like minimum lateral separation or vertical separation so its hard to tell whether this was a phantom RA or an actual potential serious incident.

    Could easily have been triggered by the rate of climb of one aircraft climbing towards the other aircraft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    by the rate of climb
    True, but isn't that the reason why we are told to reduce rate of climb approach level off?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    smurfjed wrote: »
    True, but isn't that the reason why we are told to reduce rate of climb approach level off?

    Yes indeed but doesn't always happen.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,973 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    TCAS did it's job then. No surprise to see what paper in reporting this so called incident.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    so called incident
    By our book, its a reportable incident.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    TCAS did it's job then. No surprise to see what paper in reporting this so called incident.
    If TCAS is called upon to prevent a crash then it's a serious incident.


Advertisement