Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CCTV footage

Options

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 378 ✭✭catastrophy


    Capri wrote: »
    Just looking at the Indo's 'dramatic footage' of events at a jewellers shop in town - http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/video-the-moment-martin-the-viper-foley-was-grappled-to-the-floor-in-jewellers-following-row-31039193.html
    Based on the fact that a insurance crash investigator was unable to get street CCTV footage of an accident on the grounds that 'Only the Gardai can ask for that' , how come the Indo can get and show footage of the 'jewellery store incident' before a trial, surely it would prejudice the trial :confused:

    Looks to be from directly within the shop so maybe it was sourced from the shop owner directly?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    Hope that horrible bastard is under armed guard. Wouldn't went him doing another runner.

    In answer to your question op, someone simply gave the Indo the footage. They are likely breaching data protection rules but it's not unusual for this kind of footage to be handed to media.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,499 ✭✭✭Capri


    The whole incident was a bit strange - he left jewellery into a shop to sell for him, then the shop tells him that someone 'bought' his jewellery but their card was declined and they left the shop with the jewellery but without paying for it :confused: Regardless of the 'karma' of the situation :rolleyes: it's still very strange that a jewellers wouldn't wait until the card cleared before handing over jewellery :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 252 ✭✭Chickentown


    Looks to be from directly within the shop so maybe it was sourced from the shop owner directly?

    Just wondering what difference it makes where the footage was received from, is the fact that a man has been arrested for an incident and footage of said incident later appears online but before any court case not enough for him to sue either the newspaper in question or the shop owner for defamation?


Advertisement