Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

FCC refines "broadband" as 25/3

Comments

  • #2
    watty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    We never even adopted the 4/1 spec or else the NBS was a lie.

    No Mobile system can do a minimum 4/1


  • #3
    clohamon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭clohamon


    ardmacha wrote: »
    http://www.zdnet.com/article/fcc-just-tripled-the-number-of-us-households-without-broadband

    "The U.S. Federal Communications Commission voted Thursday to reclassify "broadband" as serving households with download speeds of 25 Mbps, and 3 Mbps up. That's an increase from 4 Mbps down to 1 Mbps up under the old rules"

    Hopefully this idea will spread.

    Well it hasn't spread across the atlantic yet. This government is nearly 4 years old and it still hasn't settled on a definition for Next Generation Access, never mind delivering it. The definition of 'basic' broadband availability is having a satellite supplier.

    In the UK, 24 Mbs isn't just 'broadband' or even 'fast broadband'; it's 'super-fast broadband'.

    It doesn't really matter whether you try to define speeds (fast, superfast, ultra fast etc) or technologies ('fibre-powered' 'e-fibre' etc). As soon as the advertising men and spin-doctors get to work it all becomes meaningless anyway.


  • #4
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    clohamon wrote: »
    It doesn't really matter whether you try to define speeds (fast, superfast, ultra fast etc) or technologies ('fibre-powered' 'e-fibre' etc). As soon as the advertising men and spin-doctors get to work it all becomes meaningless anyway.

    In the US the FCC definition of broadband is a big deal as it has a big effect on the subsidies companies can get from the government.

    Nothing stopping companies continuing to sell <24mb/s ADSL and calling it whatever they want. But with this new FCC definition they get no subsidies fro mthe government and that is a big deal for the ISPs


Advertisement