Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
C/2014 Q2 Lovejoy
-
17-01-2015 3:39pm#1Finally got to image the Comet last night from Dundalk, not as detailed as I wished but a problem polar aligning meant I couldnt get more than 45s unguided without trailing
Skywatcher 200PDS (1000mm)
Canon 1100D
4X 45s ISO 1600
Dark, Bias, Flats
Reg in DSS, stacked & processed in PI11
Comments
-
-
-
greedygoblin wrote: »Great photos Zeroy.
I notice there are a lot less background stars in the second image compared to the first you posted. Is that purely down to the lower ISO settings?
Because the comet moves faster than the stars I have to do a mix of 2 stacks, in doing so I use a star mask which removes a lot of stars ... here is a single exposure with the correct number of stars:
Oh and also, its moving all the time so background stars are not the same day after day0 -
Advertisement