Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Living out allowance. Legal action.

  • 25-12-2014 8:56am
    #1
    take everything
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,810 ✭✭✭


    Just read in the IMT recently that legal action was being taken about this disappearing since Feb 2012. Despite it being in the 2010 contract.
    Anyone know how this is progressing.
    3k a year. Fair chunk of change just to whip from a contract (seemingly illegally).


Comments

  • #2
    locum-motion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    If there is legal action being taken about it, then it is sub judice.

    This means that public comment upon the subject/case is forbidden.


  • #3
    braddun
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭braddun


    http://www.medicalindependent.ie/news


  • #4
    take everything
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,810 ✭✭✭take everything


    locum-motion wrote: »
    If there is legal action being taken about it, then it is sub judice.

    This means that public comment upon the subject/case is forbidden.

    Well it was reported in the IMT a couple of weeks ago.


  • #5
    take everything
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,810 ✭✭✭take everything


    braddun wrote: »
    http://www.medicalindependent.ie/news

    Can't see anything about it in that link


  • #6
    locum-motion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    take everything wrote: »
    Well it was reported in the IMT a couple of weeks ago.

    At the risk of being accused of back seat modding, I'll answer this.

    Journalists have editors, and editors have lawyers. The journalists and the editors and the lawyers have years of training and experience in what constitutes reportage and what constitutes comment, opinion and speculation.

    It is permitted to report upon what has been said in evidence in open court.

    It is not permitted to speculate about what evidence might be presented, and what that evidence might mean.

    The average boardsie does not have the training and experience to know the difference.

    Mods: please accept my apologies if this is straying too much into your territory.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    take everything
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,810 ✭✭✭take everything


    I would've thought this only pertains if it could influence a jury.
    There are threads every day about things that are before the courts. Should they close the abortion thread about a specific case (currently before the court) in AH for example for this reason (for fear of influencing a high court judge presumably). Not a great example but I can't think of another off the top of my head.


Advertisement