Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Best Generation Mitsubishi Pajero

  • 21-12-2014 10:56PM
    #1
    Kevin McCloud
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭


    As per title of thread interested in hearing what people feel was the best model Mitsubishi has produced.
    Mitsubishi produced the first generation 1982-1991, second generation 1991-1999, third generation 1999-2006 and fourth generation 2006 to present.
    There has been several variations of engines introduced in the generations which has made one generation pajero with one engine differ on views to another on a different engine.
    For some reason or another im with the second generation, i know they are an aging model but they were well built and had modern extras.
    Ill try attach a poll.

    Which generation? 10 votes

    First generation 1982-1991
    0% 0 votes
    Second generation 1991-1999
    0% 0 votes
    Third generation 1999-2006
    90% 9 votes
    Fourth generation 2006 to present
    10% 1 vote


Comments

  • #2
    kay 9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭kay 9


    The first and second were bomb proof apart from occasional head troubles on the 2.8 I think. I chose mk3 in the pole though due to more comfort and alot more power and also extremely reliable. The only downside is the fuel pump is an expensive repair but shouldn't give trouble if the filter is changed regularly and an eye is kept on the filler pipe for corrosion. I can't comment on the newer models as I haven't yet owned one. I believe the fuel pump is a cheaper replacement so that's got to be a +.


  • #3
    Tail Docker
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭Tail Docker


    Mk3 gearboxes are shyte though, so no go for me. Not a cheap fix either.


  • #4
    kay 9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭kay 9


    Tail Docker wrote: »
    Mk3 gearboxes are shyte though, so no go for me. Not a cheap fix either.

    I've an auto box :) no dmf or clutch issues. Nicer drive and better in traffic. Had a manual and I'd never get one again for towing tbh. Automatic is in a different league.


  • #5
    Tail Docker
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭Tail Docker


    kay 9 wrote: »
    I've an auto box :) no dmf or clutch issues. Nicer drive and better in traffic. Had a manual and I'd never get one again for towing tbh. Automatic is in a different league.

    Ya crafty divil! :D


  • #6
    Bitten & Hisses
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,198 ✭✭✭Bitten & Hisses


    3.2 DiD, long wheelbase, automatic transmission.
    I drove a manual, 3.2 short wheelbase for 8 years. Drivetrain components are laughably weak and a short wheelbase 4x4 is utterly pointless.
    The 3.2 engine is excellent.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    kay 9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭kay 9


    Bitten & Hisses wrote: »
    3.2 DiD, long wheelbase, automatic transmission.
    I drove a manual, 3.2 short wheelbase for 8 years. Drivetrain components are laughably weak and a short wheelbase 4x4 is utterly pointless.
    The 3.2 engine is excellent.
    Changed from a swb 3.2 manual to a lwb automatic and the lwb is only way to go unless doing extreme off-roading which most don't. Great Jeeps with power aplenty


Advertisement