Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Administration of a will

  • 05-11-2014 1:18pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭


    I have just reviewed a recently deceased relative's will and the surviving spouse inherits everything has been appointed as the executor of the will. However, there is a statement as follows : "It is my WISH that my estate is administered by the offices of X & Y Solicitors" the surviving spouse can't remember why this was inserted .... is it now a requirement that this law firm is used as administrator or can the spouse go ahead and administer it themselves? Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭busylady


    As far as I know the spouse is free to administer the estate themselves or choose a different firm of solicitors. A "wish" in a will is not legally binding.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,893 ✭✭✭Hannibal Smith


    You'll probably find the solicitor who drafted the will is the same as those mentioned in the wish.

    I would think if the rest of the will uses wording such as 'I direct. ..' then it would definitely dilute the paragraph regard the solicitor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,624 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    The executor is under no obligation to use that firm of solicitors. A similar 'wish' was included in a will which named me as executor, I didn't use any solicitor and did personal probate. It appears to be something that a lot of solicitors include and TBH is pretty underhand as people who didn't know any better might feel that it was a binding direction which it is not so as far as I'm concerned there is no legitimate reason for it to be included in any will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,998 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It's not binding at all. There may be a case for such a clause if the testator has complex legal affairs that his existing solicitors are on top of, and there will be a briefing cost/inefficiency associated with instructing a different set of lawyers, but that would be fairly rare. I'd say in 99% of cases there is no justification for such a clause.


Advertisement