Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

45,000-year-old modern human bone yields a genome

  • 24-10-2014 12:08am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭


    Svante Pääbo's lab at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany has mastered the process of obtaining DNA from ancient bones. With the techniques in hand, the research group has set about obtaining samples from just about any bones they can find that come from the ancestors and relatives of modern humans. In their latest feat, they've obtained a genome from a human femur found in Siberia that dates from roughly the time of our species' earliest arrival there.

    The genome indicates that the individual it came from lived at a time where our interbreeding with Neanderthals was relatively recent, and Europeans and Asians hadn't yet split into distinct populations.

    http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/10/45000-year-old-modern-human-bone-yields-a-genome/


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Cool result. Though IMHO it's still early days. The more samples we get the better the picture will become. Too often individual results are too heavily focused upon. For example:

    "Neanderthal DNA is present, and in roughly the same percentage that's found in current human populations: about 2.3 percent. If you assume that interbreeding was common during the years of our coexistence with Neanderthals, then you might have expected that number to be higher, so this argues against it."

    They do go on to say the sequences were longer and then date the interbreeding event at 50-60,000 years ago. One question. Otzi the Iceman. "Only" three odd thousand years old and he was rocking over 5%? Double this sample. There are folks walking around today with over 4%. So for me I'd have no doubt there was an interbreeding event(s) at the date they give, I strongly suspect it was neither a few one offs, nor was it confined to that point or a particular geographical area. I'll bet the farm that we'll come to discover there was more admixture than we think and not just with the Neandertal folks, but with others that were already present in the landscape before we show up traipsing in from the horn of Africa all fancy like and looking for lurve. Never mind what was going on within Africa(which seems to get less of a focus).

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,239 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    I reignited by love for early human history while on honeymoon after reading Sapiens: A brief history of humankind.

    Nice little snapshot in terms of our interbreeding, and I am excited to see what else this technique finds from other samples!


Advertisement