Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Luna Ring - Solar power beamed from the Moon

Comments

  • #2
    ps200306
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭ps200306


    Talk about pie-in-the-sky! :rolleyes:

    Anyway, will there be anyone left in Japan under seventy by 2030? :)


  • #3
    jumpjack
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭jumpjack


    Fascinating but extremely dangerous in case of loss of control or terrorist attack.


  • #4
    dr strangelove
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 816 ✭✭✭dr strangelove


    Death Ray anyone....?


  • #5
    endacl
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,412 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Not only is it ludicrously far-fetched, it's ludicrously unnecessary. What we need to be doing is using less energy, not harvesting/generating more. Plus. That'd look stupid on the moon.


  • #6
    Smiles35
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭Smiles35


    Would love to have a science backround to work on the r&d for that. Surely even the reserch into transmitting power would lead to some advance in the technologies involed.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    jumpjack
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭jumpjack


    endacl wrote: »
    What we need to be doing is using less energy,
    Actually we need more energy. And we'll need even more, the more powerful our PCs and devices will get, and the more we'll be on this Earth.
    But we need less pollution.
    So we need pollution-free energy.

    But we definitely do not need a death ray! :D


  • #8
    Capt'n Midnight
    Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,604 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Noblong wrote: »
    Would love to have a science backround to work on the r&d for that. Surely even the reserch into transmitting power would lead to some advance in the technologies involed.
    Back in 1964 they were able to power a small helicopter remotely with microwaves, by 1975 they had efficiencies of 45% over a distance of a mile - this beats most wireless chargers today.

    http://mainland.cctt.org/istf2008/brown.asp
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectenna

    The moon proposal needs lots of long distance power transmission here and on the moon

    IMHO it would be easier to use mirrors in orbit , lighter and cheaper than panels. - use dichroic or fluorescent ones to pick the most efficient colours to match the cells and filter out excess heat / UV as appropiate

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statite


Advertisement