Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Monitor for Newly created files - HP-UX

  • 13-10-2014 9:52am
    #1
    L.Jenkins
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 19,242 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Have been looking and still am Googling for a method to return the name and path of a newly generated file in HP-UX. Want to create a script that will out put the result to a file, so I can grab it later on.

    Anyone have any ideas?


Comments

  • #2
    L.Jenkins
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 19,242 Mod ✭✭✭✭L.Jenkins


    Brain is in overdrive. Found a quick solution:
    find /folder type f -mtime 1 >> /folder/newFiles.log


  • #3
    bardcom
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 290 ✭✭bardcom


    Itzy wrote: »
    Brain is in overdrive. Found a quick solution:

    I think it should be -type


  • #4
    L.Jenkins
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 19,242 Mod ✭✭✭✭L.Jenkins


    Makes no odds. Works as I've quoted above.

    EDIT: For some strange reason, commands are slightly different on HP-UX versus newer distributions, so what runs on HP-UX won't work on RHEL and vice versa.


  • #5
    croo
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 1,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭croo


    Once upon a time, every box maker had their own variety of unix. Software in unix was still considered much more portable because they were all built on C so you usually just had to recompile!! They tried to standardise and created the posix standard but then linux came and now there are really just two varieties to contend with, debian & redhat... well maybe slackware is a third. But all those varieties are mostly of configuration & filesystems structures, they're all using the same kernels and, importantly in this case, the same gnu tools/commands.

    My guess is, in this case, one system is posix compliant and one is not!


Advertisement