Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Widening Motorways

  • 27-08-2014 8:57am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,658 ✭✭✭


    A few posts with the thinking to widen existing lines (e.g M4 to Maynooth/Kilcock and N7 to the M9 turnoff).

    Seeing the M50 and a few others where this has been done, does one not worry that in a 3 lane situation, most cars will move to the 2 rightmost lanes instead of staying left.

    The 3-lane thing works well in the UK where (in my experience) it is endless lines of trucks who take the left lane, slower drivers in middle and faster/overtaking drivers on the rightmost lane(s). We don't get enough truck traffic to get the same benefits here.

    Yes some of it is down to poor drivers/lane discipline also, but even when that generation die out, we'll still be low on the trucks count.

    Overall I think the proposed benefit of these is not as high as some say, especially if (as with M50) the lanes get narrower and speed limit is reduced.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    On the other hand you have the M1, which used to have jams in the rush hours, now doesn't.

    Lane discipline is pretty poor still especially at off peak times SB where most cars coming on at Lissenhall just move right to the centre lane, whether there is another vehicle in the left lane or not

    I'm not so sure about the case for the M4, is there the volume to need it widened? The vms show a 11/12 min journey time from the m50 at evening rush hour to the Maynooth junction

    The N7 has traffic backing up along it from the m7 start a lot more and definitely needs widening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,620 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    M7 inbound between the M9 and the Naas North exit (the two lane section) is a nightmare on Sunday evenings, especially in the summer. All it takes is one or two vintage cars coming home from a rally down the country and there's a massive tailback caused by a bottleneck in the outer lane as trucks and everyone else overtakes them, one extra lane will make a huge difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The N7 and N4 would be impassable if still two lane.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    The M8 seems relatively narrow in the overtaking lane after Mountrath.

    Did they do a cut price spec for the later builds then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Yes. Narrower lanes and median, allowing for less land take and smaller structures


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    MYOB wrote: »
    Yes. Narrower lanes and median, allowing for less land take and smaller structures

    I'd rather not drive the M8 after Mountrath. Went to Cashel recently and found it tiring driving with the restricted width and poor lines of sight near Urlingford.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,658 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    MYOB wrote: »
    The N7 and N4 would be impassable if still two lane.

    I agree with that but I also think that it will take a long time before the 3 lanes are utilised properly (driver mentality etc) in these sections


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Banjoxed wrote: »
    I'd rather not drive the M8 after Mountrath. Went to Cashel recently and found it tiring driving with the restricted width and poor lines of sight near Urlingford.

    Still a huge improvement in sight lines, road capacity and eliminated cross-over risk than the old N8.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    MYOB wrote: »
    Still a huge improvement in sight lines, road capacity and eliminated cross-over risk than the old N8.

    Don't fancy bouncing off the central median overtaking a swerver. It's still a bit **** after all the money chucked at it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,796 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    MYOB wrote: »
    Yes. Narrower lanes and median, allowing for less land take and smaller structures

    Is it the same on the M6/7/9/11. Just you often hear of a lot more serious accidents on the M8 compared to other motorways.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,620 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Is it the same on the M6/7/9/11. Just you often hear of a lot more serious accidents on the M8 compared to other motorways.

    M6 and M9 lanes are as wide as you need, I haven't been down the new M8 so was surprised to see that it involves narrower lanes.

    I drive the M4 (Dublin to Kinnegad), M6 (Kinnegad to Athlone), M9 (M7 interchange to Waterford) and M7 (Dublin to Limerick) frequently and have never noticed that one is different to the other so I assume the M8 is the only one that involves lanes narrower than the others.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It doesn't have narrower lanes. Same width.

    The concrete barrier is designed to deflect low angle impacts back on track, hence the step on it. Hitting a wire or Armco barrier at any angle is a guaranteed damage to both car and barrier.


Advertisement