Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Acme crow call

  • 29-07-2014 10:11AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭


    Anyone have any success with using these. Bought one last week an I've watched the videos on how to use them but to no success. Managed to call in a fox with it somehow but now crows?
    Must be doing it wrong. Only managing to shoot crows as they fly over my head whilst I'm walking.
    Would putting a decoy or two out and a dead rabbit beside them work? Or is that illegal


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    OP read section 35 of the Wildlife Act 1976, but especially the amendments made in 2000

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055315625

    Calls and decoys are extremely restricted in terms of what species they can be used for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,033 ✭✭✭deeksofdoom


    I've used the acme crow call with just 1 crow decoy to great affect. Have been able to call the crows in like dogs and shoot them. Especially in silage fields or under flight lines.

    They're not illegal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    They're not illegal.

    Here's the legislation.
    (d) use an electrical or other instrument or appliance (including recording apparatus) emitting sound, for the purpose of hunting any wild bird or any wild animal.”l

    Subsection 2 lists the exceptions for duck and geese etc and uses the same terminology, even the word "instrument"

    We should be pushing for the derogations to allow the use of callers on the species listed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 256 ✭✭shotie


    as long as you can blow into it i think you fine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    shotie wrote: »
    as long as you can blow into it i think you fine

    Only for a very limited number of species, of which crow is not one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭djflawless


    AFAIK they can be OK for "photography" use


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭dodderangler


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Only for a very limited number of species, of which crow is not one.

    Does it not count if shooting them under derogation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭Eddie B


    Vegeta wrote: »
    OP read section 35 of the Wildlife Act 1976, but especially the amendments made in 2000

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055315625

    Calls and decoys are extremely restricted in terms of what species they can be used for.

    This is a complete joke! My reading of this ammendment is that electronic devices are not allowed, full stop!
    The wording is very unclear, to me anyway!

    The NARGC need to clarify this amendment, the same way they clarified shooting crows with rifles under derogation!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    Does it not count if shooting them under derogation

    The derogation does not give specific permission to use callers for the various crow species, so it remains at the default condition which is what I outlined above:

    shall not use any instrument emitting sound for the purpose of hunting any wild bird or any wild animal.

    We can all see how inclusive that is, so anyone telling you that it's ok to use orally operated callers for crows is either confused (oral callers are ok for duck, geese etc) or wilfully ignoring very broadly phrased legislation.

    I'm just pointing out the legislation as it is written so everyone knows the score, no more, no less.

    And as Eddie B points out, the derogations are signed regularly so a draft allowing the use of callers (electronic and orally operated) is something which may be possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    djflawless wrote: »
    AFAIK they can be OK for "photography" use

    Yea they are, the definition of hunting does not include photography. Still trying to say you were photographing crows with a 12 gauge, from a hide, surrounded by dead crows blowing away on a caller.......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭garv123


    Both crow callers and decoys are a no go but everyone seems to use and sell them.

    Amending it from protected to wild was a stupid thing to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭MyNameIsMethos


    Quick meta question: are ye farmers shooting crows for worrying chickens, hunting crows for food or just shooting them for the craic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭djflawless


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Yea they are, the definition of hunting does not include photography. Still trying to say you were photographing crows with a 12 gauge, from a hide, surrounded by dead crows blowing away on a caller.......

    IPhone camera :D
    Oh BTW I don't own an iPhone it was 1St thing that came to mind


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭dodderangler


    Quick meta question: are ye farmers shooting crows for worrying chickens, hunting crows for food or just shooting them for the craic?

    Roast crow man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭ronn


    Gravy
    Spuds
    Yum
    Yum
    Troll
    Troll


Advertisement