Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Train Carrying New Boeing Fuselage parts derails

  • 05-07-2014 9:38am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭


    Linky


    I wonder if these were due to go to Ryanair? Would be just their luck the way things are going for them recently :pac:

    Pic:

    http://imgur.com/EJVBCzL


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    [IMG][/img]10511141_10152115271705146_3290627925316405507_n.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Where would they have been moving those from via train?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,340 CMod ✭✭✭✭Davy


    P_1 wrote: »
    Where would they have been moving those from via train?
    Having been built in Wichita, Kansas, the 100-foot fuselages are loaded onto freight trains to be transported over the Rocky mountains where they are assembled on a literal giant conveyor belt as part of the Boeing 737 Next Generation program.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2572445/Planes-train-Boeing-737-fuselages-arrive-firms-huge-Seattle-factory-assembled-2-000-mile-rail-journey-Kansas.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Seems a bit impractical building the hulls in Kansas and shipping them to Washington


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What about airbus building parts all over Europe ? It's just easier for both.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,390 ✭✭✭markpb


    What about airbus building parts all over Europe ? It's just easier for both.

    Airbus was a consortium of European companies, some of them state owned so keeping or having plants across Europe is more of a political or legacy decision than a practical one. Additionally, when most of the large European airlines were state-owned, it made sense to keep a plant in several counties because the purchasing country also benefitted economically from the work.

    I'd guess a lot of the same applies to Boeing, especially since a lot of their income comes from the federal government. Having a plant in various states keeps lots of congressmen happy which means military orders will keep coming in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,605 ✭✭✭gctest50


    P_1 wrote: »
    Seems a bit impractical building the hulls in Kansas and shipping them to Washington

    Ask the Beluga :)

    jt7Kjpe.jpg

    2aQ20lM.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭adam88


    gctest50 wrote: »
    Ask the Beluga :)

    jt7Kjpe.jpg

    2aQ20lM.png

    What an ugly plane. What body is that built off of


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Do Boeing use the Airbus Beluga? Wouldn't have thought they did


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,390 ✭✭✭markpb


    adam88 wrote: »
    What an ugly plane.

    And yet you quoted the photo so we all have to look at it twice, thanks! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    Poor things. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,431 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    300px-Boeing_747-400LCF_Dreamlifter.jpg

    They actually use this for the B787. Boeing has manufacturing plants all over the USA, the only assemble the aircraft in Washington State. There are various tax breaks associated with moving from state to state and this was the primary reason that Boeing moved their headquarters from Seattle to Chicago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,605 ✭✭✭gctest50


    P_1 wrote: »
    Do Boeing use the Airbus Beluga? Wouldn't have thought they did

    :pac: :D

    they've had superguppy for teh important stuffs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,431 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    The Boeing 377 Superguppy isn't flying for them anymore. Strangely enough Airbus also used the B377

    guppy.jpg


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    markpb wrote: »
    Airbus was a consortium of European companies, some of them state owned so keeping or having plants across Europe is more of a political or legacy decision than a practical one. Additionally, when most of the large European airlines were state-owned, it made sense to keep a plant in several counties because the purchasing country also benefitted economically from the work.

    I'd guess a lot of the same applies to Boeing, especially since a lot of their income comes from the federal government. Having a plant in various states keeps lots of congressmen happy which means military orders will keep coming in.

    And Boeing is the same having bought many companies over the years they have kept many of the original plants open and operating.

    Many companies do this, ship builders do this, car manufacturers do this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Ugly looking blighters all the same aren't they :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,186 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    adam88 wrote: »
    What an ugly plane. What body is that built off of

    A300 B6. Constant rumours of an A330-300 based replacement.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Aphex


    I love this users comment from the picture link:D

    "As you see here, the newly born Boeing 737's emerge from their birthplace and start their new life out in the world."

    2w6xq4g.jpg


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    When they arrive in Seattle, the fuselages are checked for any damage incurred on the train journey.

    Many of them arrive with bullet holes and need to be patched up.

    A few drunken redneck hillbillies in the woods of Montana enjoy using them as moving targets to shoot at as the trains pass by.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,561 ✭✭✭andy_g


    Well to be fair one looks like its cracked at rib 6 ish so that will be written off as ya can see in the pic.

    Others look ok


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,605 ✭✭✭gctest50


    andy_g wrote: »
    Others look ok

    be grand for a bit of target practise - might make the rednecks all patriotic

    ya need

    Bye-Bye-Miss-American-Pie-they're-Taliban-Toast-guy for the job



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭sunnysoutheast


    Lapin wrote: »
    When they arrive in Seattle, the fuselages are checked for any damage incurred on the train journey.

    Many of them arrive with bullet holes and need to be patched up.

    A few drunken redneck hillbillies in the woods of Montana enjoy using them as moving targets to shoot at as the trains pass by.

    I'm reminded by the quote from Blackadder when Francis Drake says something like "..the rain is so hard it makes your head bleed" and Edmund's smart alec reply is "well perhaps some sort of headgear is in order".

    Any reason why they don't use covered wagons, like for cars? Seems like a very high value item to be carried on an open wagon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,186 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Any reason why they don't use covered wagons, like for cars? Seems like a very high value item to be carried on an open wagon.

    Weight. Comment on another forum that they did try kevlar coatings but it scratched the protective green coating badly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭shedweller


    So am i right in thinking some of these fuselages will enter service?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭sunnysoutheast


    MYOB wrote: »
    Weight. Comment on another forum that they did try kevlar coatings but it scratched the protective green coating badly.

    Fair enough, I assume the cost accountants have worked it through but seems a bit odd to me to have to repair bullet holes rather than a few scratches! Might be more to do with the 40m+ length of the wagon.

    A 737-800 is only 41 tonnes empty, and a fair bit of that is the engines. UK aggregate and coal hoppers take approx. 70t load. on top of a 16t tare and they are piddly compared to the US.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Yeah these fuselages weigh very little compared to a laden coal wagon. Must be more to do with loading gauge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭Bazzy


    the fact someone hasnt blamed MOL or ryanair is a miracle in itself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,186 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Bazzy wrote: »
    the fact someone hasnt blamed MOL or ryanair is a miracle in itself

    Going on other forums, the frames were for Delta and some Chinese airlines so he's safe ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭sunnysoutheast


    They overhang a single wagon so that explains it. Wing root looks very close to the loading gauge too.

    Bubble wrap maybe?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,605 ✭✭✭gctest50


    Bubble wrap maybe?


    Better to be able to see a mark on it and inspect it than have no mark to warn you of damage and it crack there a few years later ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭sunnysoutheast


    gctest50 wrote: »
    Better to be able to see a mark on it and inspect it than have no mark to warn you of damage and it crack there a few years later ?

    Well I wasn't being entirely serious.

    Not sure if these movements are out of gauge or not. Anyway, given that BRK owns the company that moves them I'd assume they would have worked all this through.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    There isn't the room to cover them as the trains take in a number of tunnels en route that simply aren't wide or high enough to accommodate covered wagons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,068 ✭✭✭LoonyLovegood


    Probably a stupid idea, but could they even just put a huge canvas sheet over it? It disguises the shape, and they'd be able to see if there was any damage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Aphex wrote: »
    I love this users comment from the picture link:D

    "As you see here, the newly born Boeing 737's emerge from their birthplace and start their new life out in the world."
    Unfortunately, it's quite the opposite
    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭FuzzyDunlop100


    CTYIgirl wrote: »
    Probably a stupid idea, but could they even just put a huge canvas sheet over it? It disguises the shape, and they'd be able to see if there was any damage.

    There's a number of those trains running that same route every day, the "sharpshooters" would know exactly whats underneath the sheet/tarpaulen. The rail company isn't going to volunteer for extra work either.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,472 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    The fuselages damaged in the derailment are being scrapped.
    53d19522f3670.preview-620.jpg

    53d1951cc179f.preview-620.jpg

    A bit more on it here


Advertisement