Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How soon before DART is automated?

  • 01-06-2014 6:50pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭


    Given salary costs, and the limitations having drivers has on running times, it would be very favourable if the DART were automated. I'm aware that DARTs have to share the tracks with other categories of train, but I assume that problem could be overcome.

    The multi-line Docklands Light Railway in London is largely automated, so I don't see why a simple single-line DART couldn't be. The DLR has a slightly slower top speed than the DART, but not significantly.

    Any thoughts?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,068 ✭✭✭LoonyLovegood


    I can't see it happening for a long time, mainly due to the cost of purchasing new darts. Maybe in the future, when the current stock needs to be upgraded. But there's no point in doing it now, particularly when IE is in such dire financial straits.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭Arthur Beesley


    I'm sure the drivers union would welcome this development.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,370 ✭✭✭micosoft


    Not going to happen. Driverless networks are designed to be driverless from the ground-up like DLR, use switching and controls designed with driverless in mind and certainly do not share track with mainline services. Not doable IMHO within a reasonable timespan (<30 years).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭Ste.phen


    Wasn't the original DART spec such that it could be made driverless pretty easily?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭Mr Pseudonym


    micosoft wrote: »
    Not going to happen. Driverless networks are designed to be driverless from the ground-up like DLR, use switching and controls designed with driverless in mind and certainly do not share track with mainline services. Not doable IMHO within a reasonable timespan (<30 years).

    THIRTY YEARS?! That seems like an awfully long time to me! Thirty years ago the web was in its infancy.

    Edit: hang on...dodgy maths! The web...hadn't even been invented!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,370 ✭✭✭micosoft


    THIRTY YEARS?! That seems like an awfully long time to me! Thirty years ago the web was in its infancy.

    Edit: hang on...dodgy maths! The web...hadn't even been invented!!

    Rail investments have a far longer life cycle then the internets. We were using 40 year old locomotives up to recently. Put it another way - all the darts and intercity trains we just bought which have a lifespan of 30 years would be made obsolete (retro fitting is not really feasible). Computers have a lifespan of three years... making it much easier to rip out and upgrade.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭Mr Pseudonym


    micosoft wrote: »
    Rail investments have a far longer life cycle then the internets. We were using 40 year old locomotives up to recently. Put it another way - all the darts and intercity trains we just bought which have a lifespan of 30 years would be made obsolete (retro fitting is not really feasible). Computers have a lifespan of three years... making it much easier to rip out and upgrade.

    Fair enough. But, I can't imagine it would take that long.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    never gonna happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,323 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Ste.phen wrote: »
    Wasn't the original DART spec such that it could be made driverless pretty easily?

    Yes, there was provision for ATO.

    The issue is down the unsecured nature of the DART route. So you can certainly automate the driving but you would still need a human


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 BethG


    Yes, there was provision for ATO.

    The issue is down the unsecured nature of the DART route. So you can certainly automate the driving but you would still need a human

    It was considered that DART operate driverless on board with a guard in cab responsible for operating train doors and passengers boarding and alighting. The problem with driverless trains is that, in the event of a failure of ATO or other faults there is nobody on board to drive the train or deal with same so CIE opted for the safer and more practical option of driver/guards.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 611 ✭✭✭MGWR


    I'm sure the drivers union would welcome this development.
    Driverless trains are still subsidised. Doesn't save the public any money.

    Automated trains go back to the 1960s, on systems like the Barcelona Metro Line 2, London's Victoria Line and Philadelphia/New Jersey's "PATCO Speedline".


Advertisement