Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cycle helmets are useless, says brain surgeon

  • 31-05-2014 2:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭


    goo.gl/mml4d4

    " In the countries where bike helmets are compulsory there has been no reduction in bike injuries whatsoever."

    Lets be honest, who would you believe, a brain surgeon or someone on the board of a health and safety quango?


Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,548 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    Why believe someone? Why not just look at the statistics and research papers yourself? There's a large body of evidence to suggest that mandatory helmet use doesn't cause any significant reduction in the quantity of head injuries that occur.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    Yes but surely a helmet prevents a lot of injuries that don't get into the statistics.

    I don't think a bike helmet would make a lot of difference in a big accident because a lot of the brain injuries are internal shaking of the brain rather than impact with a hard surface. A helmet would stop or reduce the external damage and bone damage, none of which comes within the orbit of a brain surgeon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Five Lamps


    steveblack wrote: »
    goo.gl/mml4d4

    " In the countries where bike helmets are compulsory there has been no reduction in bike injuries whatsoever."

    Lets be honest, who would you believe, a brain surgeon or someone on the board of a health and safety quango?

    This statements are very misleading. It ignores a couple of basic facts:

    1) Look at the average helmet. It's only designed to protect the user to extent. Many cycle injuries involve impacts that are outside the protection that a helmet can reasonably protect you from.

    2) Many cycle injuries to other parts of the body. The statement above is very vague when it uses the word "injuries". The helmet can only protect the head and not the rest of the body.

    3) What the "no helmet" brigade conveniently forget is that helmets do protect against many impacts that "could be worse". So instead of going to hospital and becoming counted as a "bike injury" statistic you go home with a few bruises and cuts and never get counted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,188 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There's a difference between "mandatory helmet use doesn't reduce injuries" and "helmets are useless"; a vast difference.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Let's keep this as strictly as possible about commuting and transport cycling.

    -- mod


  • Advertisement
Advertisement