Really tight leggings

Buroschaf

Does anyone else stomach turn when they see people wearing really tight leggings. It leaves nothing to the imagination, it's like men wearing "speedos", too much on display.

corkgsxr

Em no for some reason never bothered me.

now dont get me started on velour pants

Agent Smith

Buroschaf wrote: »

Does anyone else stomach turn when they see people wearing really tight leggings. It leaves nothing to the imagination, it's like men wearing "speedos", too much on display.

Too much?


OR NOT ENOUGH!

wazky

Depends if she has a nice arse or not.

The One Doctor

It doesn't turn my stomach, but leggings in general do nothing positive for women's attractiveness. It somehow takes all the fun out of ogling.

jimgoose

Err, that would <harrumph> depend...

Alf. A. Male

I've a bit too much going on in me day to think about what other people wear, so I'm gonna say no.

Gatling

As long at there's a peach of an arse and toned legs in them, im all for them,
Especially the workout sporty ones

MarkR

What about the ones that aren't quite thick enough? That can be a horror show. I don't want to be anywhere near that when the elastic goes!

osarusan

That depends.

Birneybau

Yoga pants on the right woman...

suicide_circus

I only wear them when we do Shakespeare

the_monkey

Depends, needs a really fit body to look good in ..

KungPao

nothing better than strolling behind a young wan with a decent pair of buttocks who's wearing tights/leggings. Massive bonus points if they are slightly see-through...aww yis.

Ruu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6vPQL_aYfI

LoveLamps

Girls find em comfy and guys find em ... Errm..
Win/win!*


*unless she has a rotten arse

MajorMax

The problem is that it's rarely a good looking skinny girl wearing them, it's usually a pucefaced porker who never met a pie she didn't like.

You know what I mean. The material is under the sort of stress (usually only seen in tectonic plates 15 minutes before California slides into the ocean) that when the hefty heifer bends over (or tries to) the matieral immediatly turns transparant, leaving you attempting to claw your own eyes out in an immediate and instintive reaction to the horror (My God the horror!)

Gran Hermano

Camel toe pants.

KungPao

MajorMax wrote: »

The problem is that it's rarely a good looking skinny girl wearing them, it's usually a pucefaced porker who never met a pie she didn't like.

You know what I mean. The material is under the sort of stress (usually only seen in tectonic plates 15 minutes before California slides into the ocean) that when the hefty heifer bends over (or tries to) the matieral immediatly turns transparant, leaving you attempting to claw your own eyes out in an immediate and instintive reaction to the horror (My God the horror!)

I'll still have a look

osarusan

osarusan wrote: »

That depends.

Different degrees of dreadful.

Both have waaay too much junk in the trunk, one more so than the other.

stimpson

I call them mumblers. You can see her lips move, but you can't tell what she's saying.

There is a cafe near work where one of the waitresses wears thick tights instead of leggings. It's like she's walking around in just a thong. I frequent the place often.

endacl

Birneybau wrote: »

Yoghurt Yoga pants on the right woman...

There....

That's better!

Irishcrx

They look great on girls with good figures and dreadfull on those that don't.

Simples!

Boner Vs sickner...

Larbre34

Irishcrx wrote: »

They look great on girls with good figures and dreadfull on those that don't.

Simples!

Boner Vs sickner...

And not just good figures if fairness, it has to be a pure bang tidy figure, the sort that goes away after the age of about 20. Puts a lot of pressure on young wans who might be unhappy with their shape in fairness, especially if their peers are rockin them.

And its truly amazing the number of girls who put them on and dont realise they have a pair of very thick tights rather than leggings on, do they not realise fabric stretches and exposes??

pickarooney

Candie wrote: »

Different degrees of dreadful.

Both have waaay too much junk in the trunk, one more so than the other.

you have a serious body image problem

osarusan

Candie wrote: »

Different degrees of dreadful.

Both have waaay too much junk in the trunk, one more so than the other.

The second one is heavenly.

GBXI

osarusan wrote: »

The second one is heavenly.

The 2nd one is carrying a serious amount of fat!

osarusan

Heavenly fat.

jimgoose

GBXI wrote: »

The 2nd one is carrying a serious amount of fat!

Oh crikey-furk yeah. Completely serious. :cool:

Wishiwasa Littlebitaller

I like 'em.

I'm a militant anti-Semite and have to say, they make my job of differentiating Jewish men, from non Jewish men, much much easier.

josip

Like these?

Legs.Eleven

Larbre34 wrote: »

And not just good figures if fairness, it has to be a pure bang tidy figure, the sort that goes away after the age of about 20. Puts a lot of pressure on young wans who might be unhappy with their shape in fairness, especially if their peers are rockin them.

And its truly amazing the number of girls who put them on and dont realise they have a pair of very thick tights rather than leggings on, do they not realise fabric stretches and exposes??

You really think they don't? :cool:



Can't get away with wearing them myself on their own but I agree, it depends on the lady wearing them...obviously.

Pug160

They do it for the same reason some men wear very tight shirts - as an expression of their sexuality. In their case, femininity rather than masculinity. Not everybody appreciates it though, which is understandable, considering the many different shapes.

I personally like well fitted clothing, but not tight. There's a big difference.

stimpson

Legs.Eleven wrote: »

Can't get away with wearing them myself on their own but I agree, it depends on the lady wearing them...obviously.

Username fail

mad muffin

Buroschaf wrote: »

Does anyone else stomach turn when they see people wearing really tight leggings. It leaves nothing to the imagination, it's like men wearing "speedos", too much on display.

Camel toe? I like camel toe.

Autonomous Cowherd

Yock. No matter how nice the arse, put it away luv. Some of them are positively gynaecological.

(extra points for spelling )

Legs.Eleven

stimpson wrote: »

Username fail

No, my legs definitely resemble the number 11. No false advertising there.

dgt

I often wonder how they fit into tight leggings, especially leatherette ones. Do they butter up their legs and slide in?

Gatling

dgt wrote: »

I often wonder how they fit into tight leggings, especially leatherette ones. Do they butter up their legs and slide in?

Government investigation required I think this issue must be solved

NordieSteve

The fashion at the moment seems to be beards and tweed for the blokes and yoga pants with trainers for women.

Legs.Eleven

dgt wrote: »

I often wonder how they fit into tight leggings, especially leatherette ones. Do they butter up their legs and slide in?

They're stretchy, innit?

Gatling

Legs.Eleven wrote: »

They're stretchy, innit?

Butter or olive oil please god

Legs.Eleven

Gatling wrote: »

Butter or olive oil please god

Margarine. Multipack cheapo stuff.

wexie

Buroschaf wrote: »

Does anyone else stomach turn when they see people wearing really tight leggings. It leaves nothing to the imagination, it's like men wearing "speedos", too much on display.

You mean 'whisper pants'? **

Personally I'm all for them if the lady (has to be a girl/woman) in question can carry them off.

It's the difference between cameltoe and mooseknuckle


**cause you can see the lips moving but you can't hear what they're saying

shruikan2553

I think more good looking girls should wear them.

poundapunnet

It's amazing how quickly you'd get used to them. Three years ago or whenever when they first started being everywhere I could never shake the impression that people had just straight up forgot to put their skirt/shorts on before leaving in the morning.

They're comfy as all holy **** though, I can see why they're popular

stimpson

Legs.Eleven wrote: »

No, my legs definitely resemble the number 11. No false advertising there.

Weird knees and big feet?

Legs.Eleven

stimpson wrote: »

Weird knees and big feet?

Bingo.

Shakespeare's Sister

Good figure, non see-through material (it just looks bad-quality), not too much camel-toe/ass-penetration... and leggings look fantastic. If you don't have the above attributes in their entirety but you have nice legs, wear a long top/short dress over them.

Larbre34 wrote: »

And not just good figures if fairness, it has to be a pure bang tidy figure, the sort that goes away after the age of about 20.

I didn't know people's figures "go away" after 20?

greenflash

Loved girls wearing them way back when in the late 80s early 90s. Indie types in leggings and army surplus jackets. Beetle bonnets yeay!

Now I think they're just one step up from pyjamas and worn by lazy slob teens who hang around shopping centres shouting at each other and start every inane outburst with 'OH MY GOD'.

I love being an ageing judgemental bastard.