In surprise move, Cameron vows to make children illegal

porsche959

David Cameron ‏@David_Cameron 10 hrs It's unacceptable there's a loophole allowing paedophile "training manuals", that's why I want to protect children by making them illegal.



8:11 am - 27 Apr 2014 · Details

I fully support this. If children are made illegal, paedophiles won't be tempted to commit offences. Hence the social problem of paedophila can be solved at the stroke of a pen.

KingOfFairview

porsche959 wrote: »

I fully support this. If children are made illegal, paedophiles won't be tempted to commit offences. Hence the social problem of paedophila can be solved at the stroke of a pen.

Huh??? How can you make children illegal? Highly dubious.

GenieOz

Grammatical confusion leads to mildly funny thread.

Hotale.com

porsche959 wrote: »

I fully support this. If children are made illegal, paedophiles won't be tempted to commit offences. Hence the social problem of paedophila can be solved at the stroke of a pen.

I love unfortunate misunderstandings

kneemos

At least somebody is thinking about them.

shruikan2553

If I only have a 50 bag do I go to prison?

J_E

"Unattended children will be sold as slaves"...

(those signs terrified me when I was younger)

artanevilla

Hi OP, I think you've just misinterpreted the syntax, what David Cameron wants is to outlaw the 'manuals' he describes in his tweet, not the children themselves.

Hope this clears up any confusion. xxx

porsche959

Hotale.com wrote: »

I love unfortunate misunderstandings

Dave "nice but dim"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tekXxB6dosQ

Mr. Incognito

This is daily mail standard stupid.

Can you even read a sentence?

syklops

GenieOz wrote: »

Grammatical confusion leads to mildly funny thread.

I see your using the term 'mildly' loosely there.

Hotale.com

Mr. Incognito wrote: »

This is daily mail standard stupid.

Can you even read a sentence?

Can you understand sarcasm?

Pwindedd

Mines ok, but I agree everyone else's should be banished. Horrible little creatures altogether.

Cee-Jay-Cee

GenieOz wrote: »

Grammatical confusion leads to mildly funny thread.

I was recently drawn by a advertising for "massive bed sale"

I was thoroughly disappointed to find they were only selling normal sized beds.

porsche959

Mr. Incognito wrote: »

This is daily mail standard stupid.

Can you even read a sentence?

Looks like someone's got a premature case of the Mondays!

Somewhat ironically given your reference to "Daily Mail standard stupidity", the Mail's left-leaning rival the Mirror have picked up on this:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-promises-make-children-3465178

Donkey Oaty

artanevilla wrote: »

Hi OP, I think you've just misinterpreted the syntax, what David Cameron wants is to outlaw the 'manuals' he describes in his tweet, not the children themselves.

Hope this clears up any confusion. xxx

My interpretation is that the OP realises that what you say is indeed Cameron's intention - he was simply pretending to misunderstand for comedic effect.

KingOfFairview

Donkey Oaty wrote: »

My interpretation is that the OP realises that what you say is indeed Cameron's intention - he was simply pretending to misunderstand for comedic effect.

I suppose there's a certain gasness in and of that itself