Roaming thefts

bajer101

Is there a thread about this already? Apologies if I'm duplicating. When I read the headline I was expecting to see certain surnames mentioned in the full report - and I wasn't surprised. I'm very liberal, but the stats about about the crime rate from these families can no longer be ignored.

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/faces-of-five-people-charged-over-spate-of-thefts-30185625.html

catallus

There must be money to be made in breaking into houses!

keith16

Lock in 3....2....

bajer101

Why would it be locked?

Sir Arthur Daley

I always lock my house up when leaving.

bajer101

Sir Arther Daley wrote: »

I always lock my house up when leaving.

That's laudable. But the debate that I am trying to open up is that there are certain elements in our society who are responsible for a very high percentage of crimes. The percentage of crimes committed by them far outweighs their Representative numbers in the community.

A few weeks ago I rushed my mother to A&E in Beamont. She had a live threatening event. Luckily enough she got in just before two lads who stormed A&E with their injuries. They were from those families. I overheard the conversation they had with the receptionist. They said that someone threw a pipe bomb at them. I read later that the Gardai suspected that they were manufacturing a pipe bomb and it went wrong.

If we had arrived in A&E five minutes later, they would have received treatment ahead of my mother. They did receive treatment ahead of a lot of people who where sitting waiting in A&E.

They stormed into A&E and demanded treatment. They got to the head of the queue because they blew themselves up due to some feud they are having. Normal taxpaying citizens had to wait in A&E waiting room while these guys got treated first.

patsfan1286

*Roaming Thieves

Sir Arthur Daley

bajer101 wrote: »

They stormed into A&E and demanded treatment. They got to the head of the queue because they blew themselves up due to some feud they are having. Normal taxpaying citizens had to wait in A&E waiting room while these guys got treated first.

A&E are only following protocol. Those with the most critical injuries or symptoms, such as patients with multiple traumas or those unconscious or not breathing, are first priority. These patients are seen immediately. Non-urgent patients are given the lowest priority.

wil

Not so bad on Pay as you Go, but if your on bill pay in nonEurovia, thieving roamin rates.

Mike747

bajer101 wrote: »

That's laudable. But the debate that I am trying to open up is that there are certain elements in our society who are responsible for a very high percentage of crimes. The percentage of crimes committed by them far outweighs their Representative numbers in the community.

A few weeks ago I rushed my mother to A&E in Beamont. She had a live threatening event. Luckily enough she got in just before two lads who stormed A&E with their injuries. They were from those families. I overheard the conversation they had with the receptionist. They said that someone threw a pipe bomb at them. I read later that the Gardai suspected that they were manufacturing a pipe bomb and it went wrong.

If we had arrived in A&E five minutes later, they would have received treatment ahead of my mother. They did receive treatment ahead of a lot of people who where sitting waiting in A&E.

They stormed into A&E and demanded treatment. They got to the head of the queue because they blew themselves up due to some feud they are having. Normal taxpaying citizens had to wait in A&E waiting room while these guys got treated first.

Retards. Good enough for them.

patsfan1286

Sir Arther Daley wrote: »

A&E are only following protocol. Those with the most critical injuries or symptoms, such as patients with multiple traumas or those unconscious or not breathing, are first priority. These patients are seen immediately. Non-urgent patients are given the lowest priority.

I think the point is that a proper tax paying citizen may have had to have been put in a queue because a few lads had to celebrate their 'culture'.

WilyCoyote

bajer101, you know as well as everyone else on this august forum that you cannot say what you think about these fuckers. Free speech is stifled for the the greater good, ie PC gone haywire.
There should be a monument erected to Padraig Nally while he is still alive for having the gumption to end his home invasion the way he did.
This kind of behaviour is an attack on the State ...... just as high scale criminality is. But watch the way you phrase it .......... lest you be accused of racism.

I notice that Mr Collins from Pavee Point doesn't have much to say when his cohorts are inflicting grief on communities throughout the land.
For a person that gets government funding ....... it says a lot.

bajer101

Sir Arther Daley wrote: »

A&E are only following protocol. Those with the most critical injuries or symptoms, such as patients with multiple traumas or those unconscious or not breathing, are first priority. These patients are seen immediately. Non-urgent patients are given the lowest priority.

I know exactly the protocol and procedures that were followed. My sister and her husband are both consultants and have served their time in the trenches of A&E. The people running into A&E also know these protocols and demand and get treatment ahead of the ordinary taxpayer. My mother had a very serious condition and she waited her turn. These animals stormed into A&E and demanded treatment for injuries that were self inflicted. And they did demand! A&E went into lockdown due to them.

I really am very liberal, but I've had enough of their sh1te. They are a small percentage of our population, but on a pro rata basis, they are responsible for a huge percentage of crime.

MadsL

bajer101 wrote: »

I really am very liberal, but ....

I too support people being prosecuted when guilty of crimes and A&E treating people in order of severity of injury.

Should certain families receive different treatment based on their surname rather than their crime or injury? Suggesting otherwise ain't 'liberal' at all....

Pumpkinseeds

Criminality amongst our nomadic brethren has always been very high. Take a look at the court listings for any county any time of the year and you'll regularly find the same names from the same families listed on Criminal court days, often for multiple offences. They're often listed on civil court days trying to sue someone for something as well.

As for the pipe bombs, not to worry, your taxes will pay to refurbish their halting site accomodation, it'd be descrimination otherwise and they'd need another day in court to sue the council:rolleyes:

thomasm

Our local court house had a trial in relation to these feuding families. For two weeks the armed unit, circa 15 guards and a paddy wagon with more guards were stationed at the court. Everyone walking in the main gates had to be swiped with a metal detactor. Costs had to be enormous.

When I was walking past one day two members of one family pulled up across the road from courthouse and started walking to entrance carrying long handled machetes. The armed guards ran over I assumed to stick a gun in their faces and arrest them. Instead they told them you can't carry on like that and to f@ck off out of here. That was it, no arrest for carrying a dangerous weapon, intent to assault or anything like that. Fairly sure if I walked down the road with a weapon I would be arrested.

As I recall case collapsed after 2 weeks because witness changed statement. Different laws for different people

Actually lads, I'm not even closing this because of the obvious, I'm closing it because it's a case which is currently before the courts and we're not legally allowed to discuss it.