Sex Education class... from your local neighbourhood MEP

Foxhound38

Seems the Munster Labour MEP Phil Prendergast has decided to take the safe sex matters of the nation into her own hands, so to speak :pac:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDGwHrm4e-Y

Fast forward to 17:45 for the money shot

*CRINGE* :eek:

D1stant

Very informative. A dildo can double up as a towel holder. Must get one for the mother in law

jester77

D1stant wrote: »

Very informative. A dildo can double up as a towel holder. Must get one for the mother in law

She either has small towels or ... :eek:

Czarcasm

"I have my own willy here..."


I'll have to watch the rest of that once I've stopped laughing! :pac:

Foxhound38

Czarcasm wrote: »

"I have my own willy here..."


I'll have to watch the rest of that once I've stopped laughing! :pac:

Where in the name of jaysus did she get that? Is it hers? Why is this politician showing the nation her sex toy? :eek:

Tee-hee. She said vagina.

dotsman

Foxhound38 wrote: »

Fast forward to 17:45 for the money shot

*CRINGE* :eek:

I don't see what the cringe is. It is a respectable woman teaching teenagers how to take precautions to prevent them from making mistakes that will have a drastic impact on the rest of their lives.

Given the level of teenage pregnancies, the fact that more children are born in Ireland out of wedlock than in and the level of ignorance regarding sexual health, I only wish far, far , far more people would do what she is doing.

Czarcasm wrote: »

"I have my own willy here..."


I'll have to watch the rest of that once I've stopped laughing! :pac:

Don't worry, once you reach adulthood, you'll be able to watch the rest without giggling like a little schoolgirl

Deleted User wrote: »

Tee-hee. She said vagina.

I can hear your mother calling - It's time for your bath.

El Siglo

Would have been better if she put the condom on with her mouth... :pac:

Sir Arthur Daley

Await her next tutorial, whatever that may be :rolleyes:

Son Of A Vidic

El Siglo wrote: »

Would have been better if she put the condom on with her mouth... :pac:

You just created a horrific image, that has been burned indelibly into the minds of the reader. And by doing so, you have basically just ended all sex.

efb

I knew a Fr Clint Power once...

foggy_lad

"I have my own willy here"

Thank fook it was Phil Prendergast and not Phil Hogan!

conorhal

El Siglo wrote: »

Would have been better if she put the condom on with her mouth... :pac:

That's the advanced class which former Labour TD Patrick Nulty will be giving....

OldNotWIse

Czarcasm wrote: »

"I have my own willy here..."


I'll have to watch the rest of that once I've stopped laughing! :pac:

Might have known I'd find you here!

OldNotWIse

dotsman wrote: »

I don't see what the cringe is. It is a respectable woman teaching teenagers how to take precautions to prevent them from making mistakes that will have a drastic impact on the rest of their lives.

Given the level of teenage pregnancies, the fact that more children are born in Ireland out of wedlock than in and the level of ignorance regarding sexual health, I only wish far, far , far more people would do what she is doing.

Don't worry, once you reach adulthood, you'll be able to watch the rest without giggling like a little schoolgirl


I can hear your mother calling - It's time for your bath.

Bath time! The towels are just in there hanging on Granny's dildo :P

ps, Whats wrong with children born out of "wedlock"?

mikom

Impressive Cock in the background.

dotsman

dotsman wrote: »

I don't see what the cringe is. It is a respectable woman teaching teenagers how to take precautions to prevent them from making mistakes that will have a drastic impact on the rest of their lives.

Given the level of teenage pregnancies, the fact that more children are born in Ireland out of wedlock than in and the level of ignorance regarding sexual health, I only wish far, far , far more people would do what she is doing.

.

I was with you until "out of wedlock"

The One Doctor

bluewolf wrote: »

I was with you until "out of wedlock"

It's very sad that a of minority people still think that a marriage cert makes a difference to a child's upbring.

OldNotWIse

The One Doctor wrote: »

It's very sad that a minority people still think that a marriage cert makes a difference to a child's upbring.

I would go so far as to say its even more than sad - its worrying. You really see people in their true colours now that debate has started re same sex marriage ("wont someone please think of the children?!"). Mum and Dad better than two mums, two dads, one mum etc.... does't matter if they are not capable of parenting, its the "family unit" thats been burnt in our minds.

Personally, I blame Anne and Barry :P

dotsman

dotsman wrote: »

I can hear your mother calling - It's time for your bath.

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/uploads/ats23991_point.GIF

dotsman

OldNotWIse wrote: »

ps, Whats wrong with children born out of "wedlock"?

In a specific case - nothing. I'm sure there are plenty of cases where everything has worked out fine for the child/parents (in fact, I know of some). But when over half the children born today are being born to parents who have not yet may a decision to commit themselves in the long term, then that is a scary statistic.

bluewolf wrote: »

I was with you until "out of wedlock"

When I'm talking about marriage, I'm not talking about a religious marriage. I'm talking about the fact that, prior to having a child, it would be ideal if the would-be parents were at least in a place where they were already committing to being with each other for the rest of their lives (even if it is an optimistic/naive commitment).

I mean, marriage itself isn't definitive - many will break down at some stage, but it's at least a good start. But when over half the kids are born to unmarried parents, you must surely accept that a significant number of them must be "accidents" where couples, not yet ready to commit long term, inadvertently end up with an unplanned pregnancy. How many of these unplanned pregnancies are down to the lack of thorough knowledge and practice of safe sex?

The simple reality is that the attitude to sex education, sexual health and family planning is still in the ignorant catholic dark ages for many people in this country and I will fully support anybody who is trying to teach teenagers even some of these things in a non-judgemental, non-religious manner.

Foxhound38

Am I the only one childish enough to find the idea of a politician fiddling around with condoms and a giant dildo on YT hilarious?

My god AH, ye've really lost yer way of late! :pac:

Delirium

dotsman wrote: »

In a specific case - nothing. I'm sure there are plenty of cases where everything has worked out fine for the child/parents (in fact, I know of some). But when over half the children born today are being born to parents who have not yet may a decision to commit themselves in the long term, then that is a scary statistic.

When I'm talking about marriage, I'm not talking about a religious marriage. I'm talking about the fact that, prior to having a child, it would be ideal if the would-be parents were at least in a place where they were already committing to being with each other for the rest of their lives (even if it is an optimistic/naive commitment).

I mean, marriage itself isn't definitive - many will break down at some stage, but it's at least a good start. But when over half the kids are born to unmarried parents, you must surely accept that a significant number of them must be "accidents" where couples, not yet ready to commit long term, inadvertently end up with an unplanned pregnancy. How many of these unplanned pregnancies are down to the lack of thorough knowledge and practice of safe sex?

The simple reality is that the attitude to sex education, sexual health and family planning is still in the ignorant catholic dark ages for many people in this country and I will fully support anybody who is trying to teach teenagers even some of these things in a non-judgemental, non-religious manner.

Who says the parents haven't? A couple don't have to get married to make a long-term commitment to the relationship.

dotsman

SW wrote: »

Who says the parents haven't? A couple don't have to get married to make a long-term commitment to the relationship.

You're correct, they don't have to. But the majority of people do so via marriage as it gives them certain crucial financial and legal protections in relation to both their long term relationship and their children.

OldNotWIse

dotsman wrote: »

In a specific case - nothing. I'm sure there are plenty of cases where everything has worked out fine for the child/parents (in fact, I know of some). But when over half the children born today are being born to parents who have not yet may a decision to commit themselves in the long term, then that is a scary statistic.

When I'm talking about marriage, I'm not talking about a religious marriage. I'm talking about the fact that, prior to having a child, it would be ideal if the would-be parents were at least in a place where they were already committing to being with each other for the rest of their lives (even if it is an optimistic/naive commitment).

I mean, marriage itself isn't definitive - many will break down at some stage, but it's at least a good start. But when over half the kids are born to unmarried parents, you must surely accept that a significant number of them must be "accidents" where couples, not yet ready to commit long term, inadvertently end up with an unplanned pregnancy. How many of these unplanned pregnancies are down to the lack of thorough knowledge and practice of safe sex?

The simple reality is that the attitude to sex education, sexual health and family planning is still in the ignorant catholic dark ages for many people in this country and I will fully support anybody who is trying to teach teenagers even some of these things in a non-judgemental, non-religious manner.

The only committment that matters is one's committment to the child.

OldNotWIse

dotsman wrote: »

You're correct, they don't have to. But the majority of people do so via marriage as it gives them certain crucial financial and legal protections in relation to both their long
term relationship and their children.

A big bash and a wishlist in House of Fraser.
There, all better now.

Gambas

Foxhound38 wrote: »

Am I the only one childish enough to find the idea of a politician fiddling around with condoms and a giant dildo on YT hilarious?

My god AH, ye've really lost yer way of late! :pac:

Yeah, sorry but this doesn't cut it. Her presentation seems entirely reasonable to me. AH should have no truck with reasonable.

Czarcasm

dotsman wrote: »

I don't see what the cringe is. It is a respectable woman teaching teenagers how to take precautions to prevent them from making mistakes that will have a drastic impact on the rest of their lives.

Given the level of teenage pregnancies, the fact that more children are born in Ireland out of wedlock than in and the level of ignorance regarding sexual health, I only wish far, far , far more people would do what she is doing.

Don't worry, once you reach adulthood, you'll be able to watch the rest without giggling like a little schoolgirl


I can hear your mother calling - It's time for your bath.

Mind you don't slip off that giant dildo pedestal you're on, might necessitate a long and painful trip to A&E to remove it from your rear end.

TrustedApple

Funny thing is back in 5th year in my school she gave us a sex ed class it was painful LoL

Just showed us what will happen to our willy if we have sex and how sex can also be good.

Also told us anel sex was wrong LoL

She was also at my door about 2 years ago and made sure that i was reg for voting.

Not a labour fan but considering she's the only MEP that i have ever seen at my door so might get a vote from me

dotsman

OldNotWIse wrote: »

A big bash and a wishlist in House of Fraser.
There, all better now.

Wow, we are really getting off topic here (the fact that somebody is attempting to teach our teenagers the most basic aspects of sex education and all the first posts on this thread are ignorant, childish responses).

You are clearly not reading my posts and just trawling through them looking for something to argue about. I have made it very clear that, when I speak of marriage, I am not talking about weddings or religious blessings etc, but about commitment (in relation to a declaration of long-term commitment, both in terms of love and a financial/legal perspective).

Marriage gives the couple certain legal and financial protections which, from your reply, you clearly don't think are important - but I do. As a man, I don't want to father a child outside of marriage as, in this country, it leaves me in serious legal limbo in relation to paternal rights. With regards legal rights in relation to stressful medical situations, not being married may mean I have no right to have a say in how my partner/child is treated. From a financial perspective not being married can cause havoc in relation to supporting my partner/child in terms of taxation, insurance, pensions and inheritance.

I apologise for appearing responsible and wanting to approach sex and pregnancy as an adult. I will let this thread return to sniggering at willies and vaginas.

OldNotWIse

dotsman wrote: »

Wow, we are really getting off topic here (the fact that somebody is attempting to teach our teenagers the most basic aspects of sex education and all the first posts on this thread are ignorant, childish responses).

You are clearly not reading my posts and just trawling through them looking for something to argue about. I have made it very clear that, when I speak of marriage, I am not talking about weddings or religious blessings etc, but about commitment (in relation to a declaration of long-term commitment, both in terms of love and a financial/legal perspective).

Marriage gives the couple certain legal and financial protections which, from your reply, you clearly don't think are important - but I do. As a man, I don't want to father a child outside of marriage as, in this country, it leaves me in serious legal limbo in relation to paternal rights. With regards legal rights in relation to stressful medical situations, not being married may mean I have no right to have a say in how my partner/child is treated. From a financial perspective not being married can cause havoc in relation to supporting my partner/child in terms of taxation, insurance, pensions and inheritance.

I apologise for appearing responsible and wanting to approach sex and pregnancy as an adult. I will let this thread return to sniggering at willies and vaginas.

I accept your apology

Now, if you'll excuse me I have to go to the pub and meet with my plethora of basket case friends who grew up in Ann and Barry land with parents who wrecked their childhood by staying together when they really should have been living apart.

ps I agree with you 100% regarding the legal status of Dads, and that is from a woman's perspective. I think a lot of women engage in a strategic use of the law when it comes to barring orders, maintenance etc, but I certainly wouldnt want someone to marry me to ensure greater right of access to their children. Who said romance was dead?

dotsman

dotsman wrote: »

I have made it very clear that, when I speak of marriage, I am not talking about weddings or religious blessings etc, but about commitment (in relation to a declaration of long-term commitment, both in terms of love and a financial/legal perspective).
.

So when you are talking about marriage you are talking about marriage
Okay

Jesus Wept

She seems gamey enough.

Donkey Oaty

Our Year wrote: »

She seems gamey enough.

It disgusts me that you can make such a statement about one of our elected representatives.

Sex is a gift from God, and can only be said to happen when a man and his wife show their love for each other with the blessing of Our Lord Jesus Christ through the sacred institution of marriage.

Any deviation from this is an act of Satanism.

Also, there are real health and safety issues here. That dildo she showed can cause damage to your sphincter if used on maximum setting and can be difficult to clean afterwards, according to a friend of mine.

efb

Donkey Oaty wrote: »

It disgusts me that you can make such a statement about one of our elected representatives.

Sex is a gift from God, and can only be said to happen when a man and his wife show their love for each other with the blessing of Our Lord Jesus Christ through the sacred institution of marriage.

Any deviation from this is an act of Satanism.

Also, there are real health and safety issues here. That dildo she showed can cause damage to your sphincter if used on maximum setting and can be difficult to clean afterwards, according to a friend of mine.

Tell your friend to use water based lube

Donkey Oaty

efb wrote: »

Tell your friend to use water based lube

Hey, thanks!

OldNotWIse

Donkey Oaty wrote: »

It disgusts me that you can make such a statement about one of our elected representatives.

Sex is a gift from God, and can only be said to happen when a man and his wife show their love for each other with the blessing of Our Lord Jesus Christ through the sacred institution of marriage.

Any deviation from this is an act of Satanism.

Also, there are real health and safety issues here. That dildo she showed can cause damage to your sphincter if used on maximum setting and can be difficult to clean afterwards, according to a friend of mine.

This post had a strange effect one me - various facial expressions as I went from laughing at it to getting a bit worried that it might be serious...to laughing again...then frowing as I thought "hang on wait is this poster for real?" :P

OldNotWIse

efb wrote: »

Tell your friend to use water based lube

Donkey Oaty wrote: »

Hey, thanks!

"Said my friend" - you forgot this part!

foggy_lad

The One Doctor wrote: »

It's very sad that a of minority people still think that a marriage cert makes a difference to a child's upbring.

Our parents called us little bastards all the time and they were happily married:D

J_E

dotsman wrote: »

Wow, we are really getting off topic here (the fact that somebody is attempting to teach our teenagers the most basic aspects of sex education and all the first posts on this thread are ignorant, childish responses).

Childish responses, on After Hours? That's outrageous altogether.

(honestly, what do you expect on this forum? It's hopeless in that sense)

Czarcasm

Donkey Oaty wrote: »

Also, there are real health and safety issues here. That dildo she showed can cause damage to your sphincter if used on maximum setting and can be difficult to clean afterwards, according to a friend of mine.

"A friend" eh? Sounds legit

foggy_lad wrote: »

Our parents called us little bastards all the time and they were happily married:D

My parents hated us all equally... 'twas something I suppose

Donkey Oaty

OldNotWIse wrote: »

"Said my friend" - you forgot this part!

Future historians will note that the "edit" notes, made before your comment, show that not only was it not forgotten, but it was - possibly deliberately -added later for maximum impact.

I may be somewhat overestimating the importance of my AH comments to future historians.

OldNotWIse

Donkey Oaty wrote: »

Future historians will note that the "edit" notes, made before your comment, show that not only was it not forgotten, but it was - possibly deliberately -added later for maximum impact.

I may be somewhat overestimating the importance of my AH comments to future historians.

um.....what?

Nodin

bluewolf wrote: »

I was with you until "out of wedlock"

'sblood - Hold thy tongue, lest thee be taken for a scold!!!!!

The Th!ng

She should upload the video to the 'Teens' category on RedTube.

Donkey Oaty

OldNotWIse wrote: »

um.....what?

If you look at the note in small print at the bottom of post #36, hopefully it will clarify!

Mugatuu

We actually had Phil do sex ed with us in 5th year! She was good, very open and laid back. She made everyone feel comfortable talking about sex etc not like when we had sex ed before that and it was so painfully awkward with the religion teacher!

shaneon77

El Siglo wrote: »

Would have been better if she put the condom on with her mouth... :pac:

or her bum

silverbolt

Foxhound38 wrote: »

Where in the name of jaysus did she get that? Is it hers? Why is this politician showing the nation her sex toy? :eek:

that is so not a sex toy :cool:

geeky

The serious side of me thinks 'fair play, politician decides to try and educate people about safe sex'.

Then she announces that the model penis can also double up as a towel holder. Dinner parties chez Prendergast must be fascinating, especially with a 'come dine with me' style poke about the gaff.