Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Pay out from courtcases for children reaching 18 lower

  • 05-04-2014 1:21pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭


    Children who win a case in the courts do not always get this money.
    It used to be stored in a bankaccount with a low interest.
    Nowadays a broker puts all this money into 'safe' investments on the stockmarket.
    When they reach 18 the children get less than they won.
    Is this legal at all? Can the state gamble on the stockmarket with this money?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,554 ✭✭✭Pat Mustard


    Do you have a link to support your assertion that people are receiving less than they were awarded, upon attaining majority?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Do you have a link to support your assertion that people are receiving less than they were awarded, upon attaining majority?

    Some would. Some wouldn't. There are a number of options that the court will take when investing and investments can go up as well as down.

    There was a large number of minors whose money was partially in banks during the boom era and that portion was wiped out.

    However holding money as cash or in a deposit account can also be considered a gamble. If the interest is less than the rate of inflation the money they are receiving is worth less than they were originally awarded.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭Pro Hoc Vice




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,347 ✭✭✭No Pants


    Not a minor, but this is almost on-topic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭Pro Hoc Vice


    No Pants wrote: »
    Not a minor, but this is almost on-topic.

    The topic is the investment of funds by the courts service for minors and wards, while the article is about a person who is neither having their fortune gambled by a private company and the courts stepping into compensate the person.

    I have still not seen any evidence of a minor losing any if the award and I would say it's almost impossible as all minor awards are put in a general fund which is then invested across a broad range of safe investments. From my reading of the above report there is no evidence of loss.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,347 ✭✭✭No Pants


    The topic is the investment of funds by the courts service for minors and wards, while the article is about a person who is neither having their fortune gambled by a private company and the courts stepping into compensate the person.

    I have still not seen any evidence of a minor losing any if the award and I would say it's almost impossible as all minor awards are put in a general fund which is then invested across a broad range of safe investments. From my reading of the above report there is no evidence of loss.
    Agreed. I was pointing out that if this was happening, it could and would be reported.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,989 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The usual criticism of the management of funds in court is that it's excessively conservative and prudent, and the investment strategy risks the erosion of real value in order to avoid any risk of the loss of nominal value. If this criticism is true, then the real risk to funds in court is inflation, not volatile investments.


Advertisement