Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Canada House St Stephens Green

  • 28-03-2014 11:01pm
    #1
    terryhobdell
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭


    Great to see this monstrosity knocked down. Pity it was ever built. Let's hope it's replacement is a credit to its architect.
    Tagged:


Comments

  • #2
    JTMan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,558 ✭✭✭JTMan


    The replacement building does not look much better.


  • #3
    terryhobdell
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭terryhobdell


    Fungus wrote: »
    The replacement building does not look much better.

    Fungus I think you are right is the photo of the new building or the old? They look the same.


  • #4
    Teyla Emmagan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,641 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


    I am very confused. That looks like the building they are knocking to me. Same poky windows?

    They are working on it non stop anyway, I was in the NCH on Wed and there were still men on the building at 10.30pm. I would love to see more of these ugly buildings being knocked down.


  • #5
    Teyla Emmagan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,641 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


    This is the existing building. There's not much in it really (they are nearly as bad as each other).

    Canada_House.png


  • #6
    dan1895
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Fungus wrote: »
    The replacement building does not look much better.

    That looks like it was designed in the fifties. Horrible.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    chopper6
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,214 ✭✭✭chopper6


    dan1895 wrote: »
    That looks like it was designed in the fifties. Horrible.


    To my mind nowhere near as poxy as that art gallery at the top of nassau St.

    How they got permission to shoehorn that into a georgian street is beyond me.


  • #8
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Considering that the building will be charging the highest commercial rents in the city, I'm not surprised the skimped on design. I wish the building had more 'verticality' to it, either through additional storeys or by breaking up the mass, because the proposed design looks very boxy. There's eight bays on the front - if a design technique had been used to make it appear like 4+4 then the building would fit in better imo.


Advertisement