Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gravity Circuit

  • 28-03-2014 7:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭


    Hi lads, just looking for your thoughts on how well this gravity circuit will work. I know its not an ideal set up, but still think it will work.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    skippy5 wrote: »
    Hi lads, just looking for your thoughts on how well this gravity circuit will work. I know its not an ideal set up, but still think it will work.

    It'll work but that depends on the distance of pipework between the stove and the cylinder


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭skippy5


    That should be ok, its about 5 or 6 mtrs across. thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭freddyuk


    You would be better bringing the return down to the stove same route as the flow. Taking it under the floor will possibly stop the circuit. Can you run the return along from the cylinder then down to the stove?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    freddyuk wrote: »
    You would be better bringing the return down to the stove same route as the flow. Taking it under the floor will possibly stop the circuit. Can you run the return along from the cylinder then down to the stove?

    As in across the attic then down to the cylinder like the flow?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭skippy5


    No afraid not, I have 2 doors and a window in the way. The only way across is under the floor and up, even moving the cylinder to the attic is a non runner as I have not got the height.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭freddyuk


    5 metres horizontal with a dip under the floor up to the stove will not work in my experience.
    Someone on another thread who was an expert suggested they had done this but never offered any evidence so I remain very doubtful. The 5 metres horizontal will tend to kill it anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    freddyuk wrote: »
    5 metres horizontal with a dip under the floor up to the stove will not work in my experience.
    Someone on another thread who was an expert suggested they had done this but never offered any evidence so I remain very doubtful. The 5 metres horizontal will tend to kill it anyway.

    Why wouldn't it work as it is in the picture if the distances are ok? I've installed many similar to this and they work perfect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭freddyuk


    OK thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 914 ✭✭✭shane 007


    The return must nit rise up into the attic & take the same route as the flow. That will not work.
    As per the sketch, it will work as long as the distance are below 8.0m, but take off 500mm for every elbow & 300mm for every sweeping bend. I would also take off a considerable amount for the drop in the flow from the attic to the cylinder. This would be the concern area on fire start up. The creep circuit will back up their until the flow kicks in to force the return to go, so before that happens, there maybe some pitching. A small heat leak rad would help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭skippy5


    shane 007 wrote: »
    The return must nit rise up into the attic & take the same route as the flow. That will not work.
    As per the sketch, it will work as long as the distance are below 8.0m, but take off 500mm for every elbow & 300mm for every sweeping bend. I would also take off a considerable amount for the drop in the flow from the attic to the cylinder. This would be the concern area on fire start up. The creep circuit will back up their until the flow kicks in to force the return to go, so before that happens, there maybe some pitching. A small heat leak rad would help.

    Thanks Shane, there is about 1.3mtr drop to coil flow, is there a guide as to how far it can be dropped before it would cause major issues.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 914 ✭✭✭shane 007


    skippy5 wrote: »
    Thanks Shane, there is about 1.3mtr drop to coil flow, is there a guide as to how far it can be dropped before it would cause major issues.

    As I said, it would depend on how many bends & elbows are present along with distance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭skippy5


    shane 007 wrote: »
    As I said, it would depend on how many bends & elbows are present along with distance.

    There are three bends on both the flow and return, two of these are sweeping bends and one elbow. The flow rises up 1.5 mtrs across on a slight rise about 5 mtrs and down 1.5 mtrs to top of coil, the return would be similar. How much can you drop given those dimensions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 914 ✭✭✭shane 007


    skippy5 wrote: »
    There are three bends on both the flow and return, two of these are sweeping bends and one elbow. The flow rises up 1.5 mtrs across on a slight rise about 5 mtrs and down 1.5 mtrs to top of coil, the return would be similar. How much can you drop given those dimensions.

    So already you have nearly 8m of linear pipework, plus bends, so that's an extra 1.1m of bends, totalling nearly 9.0m.
    Don't forget there's an elbow at the stove, attic would have minimum 2 & another at the cylinder.
    You could try it, but it would probably benefit from a leak dissapator to encourage the gravity circuit to get going. This could be added afterwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭skippy5


    shane 007 wrote: »
    So already you have nearly 8m of linear pipework, plus bends, so that's an extra 1.1m of bends, totalling nearly 9.0m.
    Don't forget there's an elbow at the stove, attic would have minimum 2 & another at the cylinder.
    You could try it, but it would probably benefit from a leak dissapator to encourage the gravity circuit to get going. This could be added afterwards.

    Good stuff, I will try that. Thanks Shane


Advertisement