Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Talk me out of Berkshire ! if you can

  • 10-03-2014 9:53pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭


    A friend has asked me for some investment advice(long term) ,he won't need the money for the foreseeable future,he's around 40 ,i explained to him that I am a proactive trader,i am not an investor.
    He has no great time or intrest in been pro active with this,passive to say the least,i'm temped to tell him just to give it to Warren(and Charlie) ,I'm a huge fan of statistics and probabilities ,and looking at Berkshires track record,can any of ye tell me why not ?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 337 ✭✭Value Hunter


    Biggest obstacle now is their sheer size, Berkshire are a victim of their own success.

    Very hard to grow $300 billion at 50% annually

    I'm sad to say I think the days of spectacular growth and still having safety/low risk are gone for Berkshire investors

    It's becoming a case of trying to beat the market by a few percentage points every year, yet the risk would be much lower in my opinion


    If you gave Buffet $1 million to invest he'd beat anyone, but he's handicapped by his size


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭arrowloopboy


    Biggest obstacle now is their sheer size, Berkshire are a victim of their own success.

    Very hard to grow $300 billion at 50% annually

    I'm sad to say I think the days of spectacular growth and still having safety/low risk are gone for Berkshire investors

    It's becoming a case of trying to beat the market by a few percentage points every year, yet the risk would be much lower in my opinion


    If you gave Buffet $1 million to invest he'd beat anyone, but he's handicapped by his size

    This chap would be extatic with 15/20 % annually ,the guys at the bank are trying to sell him some different class of rubbish every time he's in:rolleyes:.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,283 ✭✭✭aidanki


    how about the baby berkshires


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭arrowloopboy


    aidanki wrote: »
    how about the baby berkshires

    Which ones Aidan ? (Blue ?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭lucky john


    Biggest obstacle now is their sheer size, Berkshire are a victim of their own success.

    Very hard to grow $300 billion at 50% annually

    I'm sad to say I think the days of spectacular growth and still having safety/low risk are gone for Berkshire investors

    It's becoming a case of trying to beat the market by a few percentage points every year, yet the risk would be much lower in my opinion


    If you gave Buffet $1 million to invest he'd beat anyone, but he's handicapped by his size


    Two other factors as well. Once he or any of his people show an interest in a company the price shoots up so shrewd deals are hard to come by these days. For the first few decades of his investing life he locked himself away and analysed reams of company info all on paper. He then used his massive mathematical mind to pick companies with hidden value. Now the same info is available on your smart phone so he doesn't have the advantage of almost fanatical dedication on his side.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭arrowloopboy


    lucky john wrote: »
    Two other factors as well. Once he or any of his people show an interest in a company the price shoots up so shrewd deals are hard to come by these days. For the first few decades of his investing life he locked himself away and analysed reams of company info all on paper. He then used his massive mathematical mind to pick companies with hidden value. Now the same info is available on your smart phone so he doesn't have the advantage of almost fanatical dedication on his side.

    So are you saying NO John ?,for a long term passive investment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭lucky john


    So are you saying NO John ?,for a long term passive investment.

    Warren Buffet would definitely be someone I have huge admiration for. Unfortunately he won't live forever and no matter who the chosen one is the day he retires will be a black day for Berkshire. As a long term investment I would say NO and at the same time love to be proved wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 283 ✭✭bappelbe


    Buffett himself recommends putting into an index based mutual fund or etf:
    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/12/30/warren-buffetts-super-simple-retirement-advice.aspx

    I think you will be paying more for your fund management than indicated here (I see most funds I read about charging 1-2% per year as opposed to the 0.15% or so in vanguard)
    Also your friend might want to remove currency factors by using a Euro based fund and not the S&P though I am not sure how this would affect him in the long term


Advertisement