Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

section 2 v section 3 assult non fatal offences act

  • 10-03-2014 1:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24


    I read an article recently where a section 3 assult was thrown out of court on medical ground I.e no medical evidence was supplied.

    My question is what medical evidence is needed for a section 3, assult causing harm, or a section 2 assult.

    How is an assult categorised from s.2 to the higher s. 3 offence


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭Pro Hoc Vice


    red barron wrote: »
    I read an article recently where a section 3 assult was thrown out of court on medical ground I.e no medical evidence was supplied.

    My question is what medical evidence is needed for a section 3, assult causing harm, or a section 2 assult.

    How is an assult categorised from s.2 to the higher s. 3 offence

    For section 3 there must be evidence if harm, same is usually supplied by a doctor. Section 2 there does not need to be any evidence of harm just of assault.


Advertisement