Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Remember THOSE Audi's.....?

  • 25-02-2014 4:29pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,102 ✭✭✭✭


    http://www.rte.ie/news/2014/0224/506380-ireland-criticised-for-fleet-of-eu-presidency-cars/
    Transparency campaigners have criticised Ireland and four other EU countries for using free Audi and BMW cars while negotiations were under way over strict new emissions targets.
    The German luxury car manufacturers loaned scores of vehicles over a 36-month period that coincided with the debate over new limits for carbon dioxide emissions.
    Ireland, Denmark, Cyprus, Lithuania and Greece held the EU presidency for six months each since January 2012.
    The five countries were responsible for leading policy negotiations during their respective presidencies.
    EU member states and companies sponsoring EU presidencies say sponsorship is an entirely legitimate practice, subject to strict rules, that dates back many years.
    Critics say its continuance during the emissions debate - in which the car companies have an interest - was worrying.
    "Of course, a direct conflict of interest is always hard to prove, but it can certainly be said that some German car producers have good timing when it comes to donations and sponsorships," said Rebecca Harms, co-president of the Greens.
    Marcella Smyth, a spokeswoman for the Irish presidency, said that in an effort to deliver "a cost-effective presidency" a combination of contracts, including for the loaned cars, had saved a total of €1.4m.
    She said Ireland had used public transport whenever possible and reserved the cars for driving ministers and other officials to and from airports.
    Talks have now concluded on the proposed legislation, with a vote set for the European Parliament on Tuesday.
    The parliament is expected to back a compromise deal, but the Greens say they will vote against it.
    Transparency campaigners are also critical of the sponsorships.
    "It is very worrying that governments, in return for relatively small amounts of sponsorship money, are willing to risk damaging their credibility and that of the EU presidency," said Olivier Hoedeman, research and campaigns coordinator at Corporate Europe Observatory, a Brussels corruption watchdog.
    BMW and Audi say their sponsorship was only about raising their profile in European markets.
    Audi said it regularly applied via tenders to provide cars for events because "it helps the Audi brand to increase both reputation and popularity".
    EU member states say there is nothing wrong with accepting corporate sponsorship and several of them have proudly announced their relationship with BMW or Audi, mentioning the deal in press releases and publicity material.
    Greece, which took over the presidency in January and has free use of 69 Audi cars, sent a message on Twitter declaring: "Audi is Grand Sponsor of the Hellenic EU Presidency.".
    A spokesman for the European Council, which represents heads of state and government, said the council did not keep systematic records of sponsorship, but the practice of car companies providing cars for free dates back years and in the past has included non-German and German companies.
    Although the new EU emissions rules are the toughest so far in the world, they are a dilution of the original proposal from the European Commission.
    The commission officially published its proposal in July 2012, seeking an existing limit of 130 grams of carbon dioxideper kilometre (g/km) to be cut to 95 g/km by 2020.
    An outline deal was first reached in June 2013, but that was torn up, paving the way in November last year for a weaker agreement.
    Although the adjustments are relatively minor, they are enough to give breathing space to the carmakers.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt



    Ha ! - so, they say " It is very worrying that governments, in return for relatively small amounts of sponsorship money, are willing to risk damaging their credibility and that of the EU presidency"

    What credibility - neither party (EU or Govt) have any - which begs the question.............who gives a flup ?

    And as for the Greens 'voting' against it - really, like they have any credibility either ?

    FFS

    More CO2, that's me mission these days.

    Nothing to read here folks, carry on with your day.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,733 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Ireland has no car industry so our influence or opinion is almost nil.

    The fact it would have cost them a sizeable amount of money to rent cars which in all likelyhood would have been either Audi, BMW or Mercedes I think it was a good decision to accept them free.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    Ireland has no car industry so our influence or opinion is almost nil.

    The fact it would have cost them a sizeable amount of money to rent cars which in all likelyhood would have been either Audi, BMW or Mercedes I think it was a good decision to accept them free.

    Indeed, it saved the taxpayer a fortune, and Audi got plenty of free publicity from it. A win-win for everyone, except the greenies, of course.

    But I wish they'd all shag off, all the new cars are way too complex and in the real world are no more economical than the cars of 10-20 years ago. God be with the days when you could have a V6 Mondeo, and a 320i had six cylinders. In those simpler times cars were far more reliable and just as economical, too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 615 ✭✭✭Boaty


    A few of them were sold to guards, would 50k sound right for one?


Advertisement