Skull and Bones the UN and education

indy_man

Next time someone tells you the Yale skull and bones order is fiction or that they are not evil with a communist agenda, then show them this video.

Her grandfather and father were both members of this order.

This video also shows the UN communist control of education.

John Kerry current US secretary of state was also a member, I worry what mayhem he will cause during his office.

kryogen

Without even watching that, how in the name of Keane can a society full of aggressive capitalists be communist?

Also, it is an acknowledged secret society, it is not denied or known as fiction. Its a secret society so by nature the members dont exactly talk about it a whole lot....

You appear new to the subject, so it may amuse you to learn that George W was also a member (and his daddy naturally)

It was even mentioned once or twice during the Election where they were competing with each other, both were reluctant to engage on the subject (it being a secret society and all) but didnt deny its existence

What communist effect did G W leave on the Us after his 8 years in office? Him being an extreme capitalist, like daddy, and his best friends being top guys in Enron, Halibuton etc

Very anti communist.

indy_man

Well if you watched it you would see what I mean. Plus towards the end many members are read out from its official records including both Bush's. To understand what I mean about Communism you really have to go to a discussion on the United Nations which has been influenced by members of the Skull and Bones but by many others also including David Rockefeller.

kryogen

Comminism and the Rockerfellers couldnt be further apart in fairness.

stuar

I only watched 12 minutes of the video, never seen it before, I'll watch the rest tomorrow with my hangover, seem's interesting.

I've known about skull and bones for quiet a few years now and have read about Anthony Sutton and his books.

Sutton studied at the universities of London, Göttingen, and California, and received his D.Sc. from the University of Southampton. He was an economics professor at California State University, Los Angeles and a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution from 1968 to 1973. During his time at the Hoover Institution, he wrote the major study Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (in three volumes), arguing that the West played a major role in developing the Soviet Union from its very beginnings up until the present time (1970). Sutton argued that the Soviet Union's technological and manufacturing base — which was then engaged in supplying the Viet Cong — was built by United States corporations and largely funded by US taxpayers. Steel and iron plants, the GAZ automobile factory — a Ford subsidiary, located in eastern Russia — and many other Soviet industrial enterprises were built with the help or technical assistance of the United States or US corporations. He argued further that the Soviet Union's acquisition of MIRV technology was made possible by receiving (from US sources) machining equipment for the manufacture of precision ball bearings, necessary to mass-produce MIRV-enabled missiles.
In 1973, Sutton published a popularized, condensed version of the three volumes called National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union and was therebyI][URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed"][COLOR=#0066cc]citation needed[/COLOR][/URL][/I forced out of the Hoover Institution. His conclusion from his research on the issue was that the conflicts of the Cold War were "not fought to restrain communism", since the United States, through financing the Soviet Union "directly or indirectly armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam"; rather, these wars were organised in order "to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts".[1] The update to this text, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, looked at the role of technology transfers up to the 1980s. Appendix B of that text contained the text of his 1972 testimony before Subcommittee VII of the Platform Committee of the Republican Party where he summarized the essential aspects of his overall research:
“In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all — perhaps 90-95 percent — came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance

I truely believe what he says, and in this world of smoke and mirrors there are lots of happenings that are manufactured.

Thanks for the video's, I'll watch them tomorrow, for now I'm getting my dancing shoes on and going on the hunt for a vixen/victim......;)


Follow the pink dot then look at the cross, the dot turns green.........:eek:

indy_man

kryogen wrote: »

Comminism and the Rockerfellers couldnt be further apart in fairness.

No, communism is different these days, gone are the obvious methods of world domination.

Did you know that the BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION was sponsored by wall street.

Have a read.

http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf

This information is also referenced in the original video, all factual not conspiracy. There is a group of elite western capitalists who have very much adopted Marxism.

indy_man

Also from same souce

http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf

The contradictions suggested by Minor's cartoon have been brushed under the rug of history
because they do not fit the accepted conceptual spectrum of political left and political right.
Bolsheviks are at the left end of the political spectrum and Wall Street financiers are at the
right end;therefore, we implicitly reason, the two groups have nothing in common and any
alliance between the two is absurd. Factors contrary to this neat conceptual arrangement are
usually rejected as bizarre observations or unfortunate errors. Modern history possesses such a
built-in duality and certainly if too many uncomfortable facts have been rejected and brushed
under the rug, it is an inaccurate history.


On the other hand, it may be observed that both the extreme right and the extreme left of the
conventional political spectrum are absolutely collectivist. The national socialist (for example,
the fascist) and the international socialist (for example, the Communist) both recommend
totalitarian politico-economic systems based on naked, unfettered political power and
individual coercion. Both systems require monopoly control of society. While monopoly
control of industries was once the objective of J. P. Morgan and J. D. Rockefeller, by the late
nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood that the most efficient way to
gain an unchallenged monopoly was to "go political" and make society go to work for the
monopolists — under the name of the public good and the public interest. This strategy was
detailed in 1906 by Frederick C. Howe in his Confessions of a Monopolist. Howe, by the way,
is also a figure in the story of the Bolshevik Revolution.

indy_man

http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FinalWarning&C=7.3

Western Support of the Soviet Union
American and European industrialists rushed to the aid of the Russians. The International Barnsdale Corporation and Standard Oil got drilling rights; Stuart, James and Cook, Inc. reorganized the coal mines; General Electric sold them electrical equipment; and other major firms like Westinghouse, DuPont and RCA, also aided the Communists. Standard Oil of New Jersey bought 50% of their huge Caucasus oil fields and in 1927 built a large refinery in Russia. Standard Oil, with their subsidiary Vacuum Oil Co., made a deal to sell Soviet oil to European countries and even arranged to get them a $75 million loan. Today, Russia is the world's largest petroleum producer and some researchers believe that the Rockefellers still own the oil production facilities in Russia withdrawing the profits through Switzerland.

Rockefeller's Chase National Bank (later known as Chase Manhattan Bank) helped establish the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce in 1922, and its first President was Reeve Schley, a Chase Vice-President. In 1925, Chase National and PromBank (a German bank) developed a complete program to finance the Soviets raw material exports to the United States, and imports of U.S. cotton and machinery. Chase National and Equitable Trust Co. were the dominant forces in Soviet credit dealings. In 1928, Chase sold the Bolsheviks bonds in America, and was severely criticized by various patriotic groups who called them "a disgrace to America."

America sent Russia vast quantities of food and other relief supplies. Lenin had said that the capitalists would do business with anyone, and when Russia was through with them the Communists would take over the world. That is what the Russian Communists have been led to believe. In reality, the Illuminati was completely financing the entire country of Russia in order to transform them into a world power with principles completely opposite to that of the United States.