article dat may interest ultra runners,,track fairies dont even open or comment

ultraman1

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0083867

TRR

ultraman1 wrote: »

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0083867

I just read the abstract but found it odd they would comment on the prevalence of HIV! It's not as if you could directly correlate HIV transmission to ultrarunning ............... or maybe you could if you assume ultrarunners are too scrawny to get the ride or haven't the time to inject intravenous drugs

ultraman1

TRR wrote: »

I just read the abstract but found it odd they would comment on the prevalence of HIV! It's not as if you could directly correlate HIV transmission to ultrarunning ............... or maybe you could if you assume ultrarunners are too scrawny to get the ride or haven't the time to inject intravenous drugs

some people(bout two from dat study,or one depending who gives) are just better lookin from the rear,,,,

pconn062

What's this new track fairy bullshit all about?? Restricting threads to people because of the events they run? All the ultra-runners should have a look at the middle distance thread, they might just learn something!

ultraman1

And so it has begun..

pconn062

In fairness you started it with your thread title.

MrCreosote

Nothing too outlandish on the study- the injury rate of 65% is pretty low, compares well with marathon or shorter distance training I think.

Anyway, I'm sitting back to watch the fight between the muscle-bound preening track prima-donnas and the glorified hikers.

pa4

I'm a track fairy and enjoy reading these studies!

gerard_65

Sits back with the popcorn:D

ultrapercy

pa4 wrote: »

I'm a track fairy and enjoy reading these studies!

I rread your blog, fairy you aint.