Teen Mob Attack 66-Year-Old Because He Had No Ears

justforlaugh

i don't consider myself a violent person but this make my blood boil, these kids will get off with a slap on the wrist when they get caught. If it was the other way round a 66 year old man beating up a teenager he' will be doing long jail time.

As far as i am concerned i believe in eye for an eye, these fecker need a beating and be put in their place.

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

it's not their fault, they just dont have facilities. we should all get together and get them a ps4 or xbox one the poor little dotes

Birneybau

justforlaugh wrote: »

i don't consider myself a violent person but this make my blood boil, these kids will get off with a slap on the wrist when they get caught. If it was the other way round a 66 year old man beating up a teenager he' will be doing long jail time.

As far as i am concerned i believe in eye for an eye, these fecker need a beating and be put in their place.

'Ear 'Ear.

What of those that attack the eyeless?

Jawgap

justforlaugh wrote: »

...or an ear for an ear.....

wazky

Well its hard to tell by just that video but at 5 seconds in, you can see the earless lad throwing the first punch.

Sir Arthur Daley

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar wrote: »

it's not their fault, they just dont have facilities. we should all get together and get them a ps4 or xbox one the poor little dotes

And an iphone 5.

SV

Kind of hard to see but looks like he hit yer man first before being laid upon. Also, 2 guys, hardly a mob. Very sensationalist.

SimonLynch

Looks like Facebook got identities quick - http://members3.boardhost.com/marionsboard/thread/1389287942.html

wazky

SV wrote: »

Kind of hard to see but looks like he hit yer man first before being laid upon. Also, 2 guys, hardly a mob. Very sensationalist.

*cough*.... MAIL!!....*cough*..

Mickey H

Scumbags. Kill them. Kill them with fire.

Knasher

wazky wrote: »

Well its hard to tell by just that video but at 5 seconds in, you can see the earless lad throwing the first punch.

Looked like they were jeering him, he gave one of them a shove and then they lay into him. Throughout I don't think I saw him throw a single punch.

SV

Knasher wrote: »

Looked like they were jeering him, he gave one of them a shove and then they lay into him. Throughout I don't think I saw him throw a single punch.

How do you know it was a shove and not a punch? It's impossible to tell.

SimonLynch

I'll try again - http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/gang-attack-disabled-stockport-pensioner-6484129
from a local paper, despicable little ****es.

Sir Osis of Liver.

Lone Stone

Ahh earrr mate learrrrv eh ouuuhh..

I'll get my coat.

wazky

Knasher wrote: »

Looked like they were jeering him, he gave one of them a shove and then they lay into him. Throughout I don't think I saw him throw a single punch.

Okay then, he gave made the first contact/raised his hands first which instigated the fracas.

Do you try to knock out everyone who slags you?

Knasher

SV wrote: »

How do you know it was a shove and not a punch? It's impossible to tell.

I'm by no means certain, it just like there wasn't much force behind it, the angle didn't look much like he was going for a punch. By no means an expert, I'm just giving my impression.

My name is URL

SV wrote: »

Kind of hard to see but looks like he hit yer man first before being laid upon. Also, 2 guys, hardly a mob. Very sensationalist.

Why would they leg it and put up their huds if he started it though? That itself screams of guilt on their part.

SV

My name is URL wrote: »

Why would they leg it and put up their huds if he started it though? That itself screams guilt on their part.

Probably because they went a bit too far

Knasher

wazky wrote: »

Okay then, he gave made the first contact/raised his hands first which instigated the fracas.

If they were jeering him then no, he didn't instigate it. He was foolish to react, because as far as they seemed to be concerned that gave them licence to lay into him as soon as he did. And he was probably fortunate that he didn't put up a much of a fight and backed against the wall, because I'd imagine the other two would have jumped in if he had.

wazky wrote: »

Do you try to knock out everyone who slags you?

I don't know why you felt the need to insult me by insinuating that, but no I don't feel like punching you for it. Is there really nothing you can imagine a stranger saying that might provoke a reaction from you? I've been slagged enough in my lifetime to at least sympathise with somebody reacting physically to it.

dreamers75

wazky wrote: »

Okay then, he gave made the first contact/raised his hands first which instigated the fracas.

Do you try to knock out everyone who slags you?

They followed him off a bus..clearly he started it.....read the article maybe?

TheBegotten

wazky wrote: »

Okay then, he gave made the first contact/raised his hands first which instigated the fracas.

Do you try to knock out everyone who slags you?

AFAIK, self defence laws say you don't actually have to be hit first to defend yourself, you just have to feel that you're under enough threat to justify your actions.

BorneTobyWilde

Ear Ye Ear Ye
I can't Hear ye

justforlaugh

My name is URL wrote: »

Why would they leg it and put up their huds if he started it though? That itself screams of guilt on their part.

This... beating up a 66 year old man who got a disability and then do a runner. The old man is old enough to be their grandad, I hope these kids get caught so their grandparents know what they are capable of.