Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Grangegorman Luas / cycle / pedestrian route still blocked by filling station

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 879 ✭✭✭TheBandicoot


    God, I really hope they don't end half assing this and fitting the future developments around the filling station, it will look awful and create a very poor space.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,957 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Heaven's sake just CPO the land, you can hardly redesign the luas and public plaza around it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,146 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I would be seriously worried about the length of time a filling station site is meant to lay idle before being constructed over if it does go to CPO and the delays that can entail.

    The article there makes it sound like its a Maxol corporate owned site rather than a franchiser owned one, in which case I have zero sympathy for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,004 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    MYOB wrote: »
    I would be seriously worried about the length of time a filling station site is meant to lay idle before being constructed over if it does go to CPO and the delays that can entail.

    The article there makes it sound like its a Maxol corporate owned site rather than a franchiser owned one, in which case I have zero sympathy for them.

    I say well done Maxol and Tom Noonan,it's more than high-time the Dublin Civic Administrative collective was given a good hard kick up the arxe...for far too long,these chancers have muddled and fiddled their way around the City,until it's central core today resembles a 24 hour set for Night of the Living Dead.

    And MYOB,you would be absolutely correct to be seriously worried about this.

    This issue appears to revolve as much around incompetence or an over inflated sense of importance as anything else.

    However,when it is placed alongside the cack-handed hit'n miss manner in which the RPA and it's co-conspirators have begun the BXD construction phase,it is nothing,if not,totally predictable.

    The RPA's decision to assume all insurance liability for BXD's construction work may yet turn out to be VERY short sighted indeed,as if the Initial Stephens Green stuff is any guide,the exposure to claims of all sorts will be substantial indeed.

    I sense an Irish solution to an Irish problem in the offing....a half baked compromise....:D


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,727 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Ah man that's my fav petrol station in the north city, it's got some of the cheapest petrol going and the staff are sound.
    Still though if it is for the common good then it should be CPOd. It'll mean the first petrol station on the N2 coming from the city is out past Glasnevin cemetery:(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,146 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That already is the first station on the N2 - the road was detrunked inside the M50.

    There are a few petrol station sites within the city that could be reactivated (as the one on Amiens Street and the one on Northumberland Road were) if the shortage of stations within the city becomes too acute. They could also remove the planning constraint on having buildings *above* the pumps to allow the ground floor filling stations that other cities have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    MYOB wrote: »
    They could also remove the planning constraint on having buildings *above* the pumps to allow the ground floor filling stations that other cities have.
    Just get builders to self certify the safety regs have been met and sher what could go wrong

    Does the tramline go through the fuel station or is it access for the DIT?
    A planner with Fingal coco told me at an information day that they could not CPO land for a school, she also had no idea how it came to pass that houses were built on land designated for a primary school
    She may have been incompetent or lying about both those things though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    AlekSmart wrote: »
    I say well done Maxol and Tom Noonan,it's more than high-time the Dublin Civic Administrative collective was given a good hard kick up the arxe...for far too long,these chancers have muddled and fiddled their way around the City,until it's central core today resembles a 24 hour set for Night of the Living Dead.

    And MYOB,you would be absolutely correct to be seriously worried about this.

    This issue appears to revolve as much around incompetence or an over inflated sense of importance as anything else.

    However,when it is placed alongside the cack-handed hit'n miss manner in which the RPA and it's co-conspirators have begun the BXD construction phase,it is nothing,if not,totally predictable.

    The RPA's decision to assume all insurance liability for BXD's construction work may yet turn out to be VERY short sighted indeed,as if the Initial Stephens Green stuff is any guide,the exposure to claims of all sorts will be substantial indeed.

    I sense an Irish solution to an Irish problem in the offing....a half baked compromise....:D

    Well here's mine: I'm not buying from Maxol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭Devilman40k


    Banjoxed wrote: »
    Well here's mine: I'm not buying from Maxol.

    But this is not a result of Maxol doing anything wrong. they said they'd move if they were provided with a suitable location to relocate, DCC said yes but haven't provided an alternative to the original proposal. All this and they still want to proceed without the alternative already in place.

    If anything DCC are at fault and need to be taken outside and kicked until a solution is provided be that CPO or otherwise. I don't see how Maxol are in any way responsible.


Advertisement