Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Disabled WC required?

  • 02-12-2013 10:43am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭


    I just received a DAC grant from a local authority for a 2 class portacabin for an existing secondary school, however one of the conditions is that a Unisex Disabled WC must included in the new Portacabin building.

    I didn't propose any sanitary facilities in the building as they are centrally located within the main school building. I think the BC officer has taken it on himself to impose this condition with out any justification from TGD - Part M.

    Can anyone point to me where it states that each individual building must self contained have sanitary facilitates??

    Thanks.


Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 42,172 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    kieran. wrote: »
    I just received a DAC grant from a local authority for a 2 class portacabin for an existing secondary school, however one of the conditions is that a Unisex Disabled WC must included in the new Portacabin building.

    I didn't propose any sanitary facilities in the building as they are centrally located within the main school building. I think the BC officer has taken it on himself to impose this condition with out any justification from TGD - Part M.

    Can anyone point to me where it states that each individual building must self contained have sanitary facilitates??

    Thanks.

    those who pay the grants call the tune.

    You should contact the BCO to see if there is a compromise.

    Is it acceptable for children to have to go outside in rain / hail to use the loo?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    I understand what your saying in relation to the prevailing weather conditions but my answer would be if they need to brave the elements to get to and from classes there should be no issue them doing the same to use the loo. Also there are 3 other Pre-Fab units (Pre DAC regs) on the site with no sanitary facilities in the same location approx 15-20m from the main building.

    I do't agree with "those who pay the grants call the tune". IMHO the BC officer is only the law enforcer not the law maker. If its not in black and white I'll always fight my(clients) case. I was just asking if its stipulated in the regs as a requirement somewhere and I have overlooked it, as I don't want to waste my time with An Bord Pleanla if it is.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,172 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Why do you think the regulations are the baseline requirements here?

    When grant assistance is involved is not unusual to have lots of various requirements and stipulations above and beyond regulations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    Sorry I think you have misunderstood. My original query is in relation to condition attached to a Disability Access Certificate granted by the Local Authority.

    There is no grant involved.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,172 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    kieran. wrote: »
    Sorry I think you have misunderstood. My original query is in relation to condition attached to a Disability Access Certificate granted by the Local Authority.

    There is no grant involved.

    Oh my bad, picked it up completely wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    No bother was thinking that :D. Going back to my original question have you come across any where in part M that state catogorcially that all buildings must have a disabled WC?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭prewtna


    all new buildings - temporary or otherwise - would have to be in full compliance with all current building regulations - hence the disabled wc.

    we have put extensions onto schools where we had to include disabled access wc in the extension (even though there was no grant money for it) in order to satisfy the BCO that it would comply with Part M.

    similar to above i have put in disabled access wc in prefabs for schools too - its standard now really.

    i wouldn't waste time going to ABP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    While I would agree with you in its standard procedure to have a Disabled WC. The job in question was an emergency works job part of the school burnt down a couple of weeks before the start of term and an old PreFab building that wasn't being use on another school site was reused on the site in question therefore a Disable WC wasn't requested by the VEC.

    No where in section 1.4 of part M can I see that it states sanitary facilities must be provided within a building. From what I see it only states if they are provide they should comply with Section 1.4.3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭prewtna


    1.4.3.1 Provisions for wheelchair
    accessible unisex WCs
    The provisions for wheelchair accessible
    unisex WCs are as follows:

    (a) Buildings with a nett floor area per
    floor greater than 200 m2 should
    provide a wheelchair accessible
    unisex WC
    with minimum turning
    space of 1800 mm x 1800 mm
    (Refer to Diagram 15a). Buildings
    with a nett floor area per floor of 200
    m2
    or less may provide a minimum
    turning space of 1500 mm x 1500
    mm (Refer to Diagram 15b). Where
    space permits, a turning space in
    excess of 1500 mm x 1500 mm
    should be considered. In calculating
    the nett floor area the area of any
    vertical circulation, common sanitary
    facility and maintenance areas in the
    storey should not be included;
    (b) Where there is only one WC facility
    provided in the building, it should be
    unisex, wheelchair accessible and
    incorporate a standing-user height
    washbasin, in addition to the finger
    rinse basin associated with the WC
    pan.
    Rationale: This provision will
    facilitate the needs of a wider range
    of users;


    i would have thought this was explicit enough? they seem to allow a smaller size for a smaller building but fundamentally disabled access wc is required no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    Yup, thats pretty explicit. I thought when you had a group of buildings
    you could have a centrally located toilet block.

    Thanks


  • Advertisement
Advertisement