Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

new steroid test shows up hundreds of positives

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner




    After reading the book "The Dirtiest Race in History", I doubt many bans will be issued.

    I think they be better to just have a free for all and lets run.

    Whats the difference between new high tech gear to make you go faster and drugs some may ask.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭ultrapercy


    After reading the book "The Dirtiest Race in History", I doubt many bans will be issued.

    I think they be better to just have a free for all and lets run.

    Whats the difference between new high tech gear to make you go faster and drugs some may ask.

    Its highly unlikely someone will drop dead at 38 from the misuse of hightech gear, although,no doubt, it has happened. There is no such thing as a free for all in relation to performance enhancing drugs, what happens at the very top level of any sport trickles down to the lowest level and influences children and juniors. At any rate the fight of good versus evil should always be fought, giving up when the going is tough is not an option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    ultrapercy wrote: »
    Its highly unlikely someone will drop dead at 38 from the misuse of hightech gear, although,no doubt, it has happened. There is no such thing as a free for all in relation to performance enhancing drugs, what happens at the very top level of any sport trickles down to the lowest level and influences children and juniors. At any rate the fight of good versus evil should always be fought, giving up when the going is tough is not an option.

    Its not call giving up, but its more dangerous to have people taking drugs behind a curtain than in the open. I know i would prefer to know what my kid was doing than having to do it behind my back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭tomdempsey200


    they have this test with new detection window

    hundreds of positives showing on tests

    thousands of samples available for testing

    I bet there'll be a handful banned as usual


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭ultrapercy


    Its not call giving up, but its more dangerous to have people taking drugs behind a curtain than in the open. I know i would prefer to know what my kid was doing than having to do it behind my back.

    I presume if your son came home one day and declared he was about to shoot some heroin you would try to stop him ? Maybe you would say "thats fine son so long as you do it in front of me or your mother." Anything is possible these days I suppose, especially with kids.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,697 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Its not call giving up, but its more dangerous to have people taking drugs behind a curtain than in the open. I know i would prefer to know what my kid was doing than having to do it behind my back.

    facepalm.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭tomdempsey200


    kids will have to dope to succeed at any level if there's a doping freeforall


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    ultrapercy wrote: »
    I presume if your son came home one day and declared he was about to shoot some heroin you would try to stop him ? Maybe you would say "thats fine son so long as you do it in front of me or your mother." Anything is possible these days I suppose, especially with kids.

    Yes I would of course tried to stop him. I would try to stop them on all drugs. Lets keep off recreational drugs, just to sports for this topic.


    But if your kid is on something for sports which is a common thing these days and suddenly drops to the floor, you damn better know, so you can tell the medics to get the best chance of surviving. It was well known that 16 year old's in sport back in the 90's were on certain stuff, I declined, but my parents wouldn't of had a clue if I had taken it.

    So ignoring the issue can be just as dangerous but humans are good at that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    kids will have to dope to succeed at any level if there's a doping freeforall


    Kids are taking stuff for years now. Just look at the size of some 16-18 year olds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭tomdempsey200


    Kids are taking stuff for years now. Just look at the size of some 16-18 year olds.

    ya but you wouldn't be able to win a national sprint title here without cheap steroids

    without anti-doping

    at the moment you can


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭bajer101




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Clum


    After reading the book "The Dirtiest Race in History", I doubt many bans will be issued.

    I think they be better to just have a free for all and lets run.

    Whats the difference between new high tech gear to make you go faster and drugs some may ask.

    In some cases no difference whatsoever. And for that reason not all high tech gear that makes people go faster is allowed in competition.

    The IAAF have a ban on technical devices that incorporate springs, wheels or any other element that provides the user with an advantage over another athlete.

    Same in other sports. Bikes have to conform to certain UCI technical regulations. Performance enhancing, non-textile swimsuits are banned from FINA competitions.

    There are many valid reasons why people objected to Oscar Pretorius from competing in full-abled or full-bodied (whatever way is best to term non-prostetic assisted athletes) races. When Pretorius was beaten by Alan Oliviera (both users of running blades) Pretorius commented that they "are not running in a fair race" refering to the difference in lengths of the blades being used.

    Controlling doping in sport is only one of the aspects of keeping a level playing field. Allow doping and you may as well allow technical advances too. But allowing either or both removes the whole basis of man versus man and we move to a machine versus machine scenario.


Advertisement