Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Canon 600D V 6D / Sigma 18-35 1.8 V Canon 24-105 F4L

  • 03-11-2013 2:11pm
    #1
    MarkN
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭


    A little unscientific comparison I've done. Earlier in September/October I shot the top pictures, today I shot the bottom. I couldn't shoot from the exact same point as there were too many people behind me. Time of day is different, light is different, sky is different but.... it's a comparison, of sorts.

    Top two are Canon 600D (crop) bottom is Canon 6D (full frame). Top two are the Sigma 18-35 1.8 and the bottom is a Canon 24-105 F4L.

    Let me know your thoughts if you have time!

    Canon 600D
    10156988485_682dbc8172_c.jpg
    9734434343_4c03e70bf2_c.jpg

    Canon 6D
    10646247803_791ee38c13_c.jpg


Comments

  • #2
    robertxxx
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭robertxxx


    It's all about the light and the bottom one has better light, resulting in better realism.


  • #3
    Splinters
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 905 ✭✭✭Splinters


    Different lens, different size sensors, different digic processors, different days, different weather and light conditions.

    They're very nice shots, but the conditions really are so different they're not really worth comparing.


  • #4
    amdgilmore
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭amdgilmore


    Yeah, I'm not sure what the point of this is.

    If you're running a comparison, then there can only be one variable (eg the lens OR the camera OR the lighting conditions [the latter, in turn, creates other variables such as ISO, shutter speed, aperture]).

    You need all but one element to be constant in order to draw any conclusions whatsoever, or indeed for this to be labelled a comparison of any sort.

    So try it again with a tripod, the same settings on both cameras, and the same lens on both cameras.


  • #5
    Zascar
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 12,616 Mod ✭✭✭✭Zascar


    Mark, I'm considering getting rid of my 24-105 and getting the Sigma 18-35. Any thoughts for me?


Advertisement