Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

EI Flight Returned from Jersey.

  • 23-10-2013 8:17pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭


    A question for the pros.

    A friend of mine was on a flight from EIDW to EGJJ last Saturday (19th Oct) with EIN.

    From what he says, the plane was on approach and just before landing it climbed out. The pilot said that the runway was too wet. The aircraft diverted to Rennes and then returned to EIDW. He was overnighted at a hotel in Dublin and flew to Jersey the next day.

    Could a wet runway cause this?

    This guy used to be maintenance at EGJJ so is of the opinion that 'too wet' is not a good enough reason to divert.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭basill


    Problem with Jersey is its runway limiting for our Airbus fleet when its wet. Also a problem can arise if you land when its dry but then it rains and you can easily be snookered getting out again. If you are lucky you might get off again empty. I suspect they made a call on the day to try and give it a go but unfortunately Mother Nature wasn't playing her part.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    basill wrote: »
    Problem with Jersey is its runway limiting for our Airbus fleet when its wet.

    Why? Is the runway a bit short?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭River Song


    crosstownk wrote: »
    Why? Is the runway a bit short?

    It's a bit short but doable for an airbus. The fact that the end of the runway is on top of a hill, with a drop off at the end might play a part. The plane went to Rennes to get fuel and went back to Dublin after. An A319 went to Jersey the next morning with those passengers. The passengers due to travel JER-DUB went with FlyBE to Gatwick and on to Dublin on one of the late flights


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭basill


    It's about 5,500ft. Compare that to Cork at approx. 7,000ft which certainly focuses the mind on a wet and windy day. Makes Dublin at 8,700ft seem positively huge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Can anyone tell me if the original flight was an A320 or A319? Hardly an ATR?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭River Song


    crosstownk wrote: »
    Can anyone tell me if the original flight was an A320 or A319?

    A320


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Cheers folks. Great info.

    I know the A319 is slightly smaller and lighter than an A320. How does this transfer to required landing runway? (Average - I know load, fuel, etc, plays a part)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 525 ✭✭✭Suasdaguna1


    Airbus themselves have added an extra 15% for landing distances required recently. I wonder did this extra 15% be the final straw?


Advertisement