Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Shell License revoked

  • 15-10-2013 5:08pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭


    Hot off the press....a major setback for this project and this is gonna cost Shell a packet. Hopefully there will be no lay offs as a result.

    Revised licence for operation of Shell gas terminal at Ballinaboy quashed by Commercial Court.

    Updated: 17:53, Tuesday, 15 October 2013



    The licence permitted the operation of a gas refinery and combustion installations at the Ballinaboy Bridge gas terminal in Co Mayo The revised licence for the operation of the Shell gas terminal at Ballinaboy, Co Mayo, has been quashed by the Commercial Court.
    In a setback for the Shell Corrib gas pipeline project, the Environmental Protection Agency, which issued the licence last June, conceded in court that a Mayo man was entitled to an order quashing the licence because of defects in carrying out an Environmental Impact Assessment.

    Mr Justice Peter Kelly granted the order to Martin Harrington of Doohoma, Ballina, Co Mayo, after the EPA said it was not opposing his challenge to the licence issued by the agency to Shell E&P Ireland. The EPA will also pay Mr Harrington's costs.

    The licence permitted the operation of a gas refinery and combustion installations at the Ballinaboy Bridge gas terminal in Co Mayo. Shell E&P Ireland told an earlier court hearing that this case had "significant potential commercial consequences" for the €2.7bn Corrib gas project.

    In the earlier hearing Shell said the construction of the terminal had been largely completed and it was intended to begin commissioning it in April next year.

    Gas was due to be brought in for the first time towards the end of next year or early 2015.
    Mr Harrington had argued that in issuing the revised licence, the EPA had failed to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment in a manner that met the requirements of various European Union Directives including the Habitats Directive.

    He claimed the EPA was wrong to decide to retrospectively carry out an EIA at a meeting of the EPA Board held in June when the decision in respect of the licence had already been made.

    Such an assessment must be carried out before a decision is made on a licence, he argued.


Comments

  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 16,724 Mod ✭✭✭✭yop


    Prob just get the EPA to do the assessment next week and then go for the license.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2 ismoke


    Normal legal challenges. Will be fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,604 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    Completely bored of the pipeline line bull**** now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    Hope this is a procedural rather than a substantive point.

    the quicker this project is commissioned, the better.

    We need the jobs and further FDI investment


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 16,724 Mod ✭✭✭✭yop


    nuac wrote: »
    Hope this is a procedural rather than a substantive point.

    the quicker this project is commissioned, the better.

    We need the jobs and further FDI investment

    Exactly. Dragging on too long now, the area needs the jobs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭loremolis


    How did the EPA mess this up so badly?

    Have they never issued a licence before?

    Another state body messes up and we foot the bill.


Advertisement