Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Seiko Diver - help

  • 10-10-2013 9:36am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭


    Hey,
    I have decided to buy my first diver and am settled on Seiko as a brand. I am drawn to the SKX007 below as it ticks my boxes from a size, layout and movement perspective.
    SKX007J1.jpg
    However, before I buy (probably through creation) any advice considering the following?
    The SKX007 has an automatic movement. I will wear the watch c3 days per week. I don't have a watchwinder and would prefer not to buy one. Therefore, should I consider a mechanical hand wind watch or an auto with a hand wind option. If so, and within the Seiko brand and my price (c€200), the only option I can see is the SRP311 (Monster) which has the auto / hand wind combination I am looking for but I am not as keen on the design (I want simple, non chronograph).
    SRP311J1.jpg
    Are there others in the €200 / €250 Seiko range I should consider?
    What others should I look at? Orient, Hamilton etc...
    What's the reserve like on the SKX007 - would it live with being worn every other day?
    Any other comments?
    Cheers,
    G


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    I'm probably showing my ignorance here, but if you're not wearing it every day and don't want to have to set the time when you put it on, then would the choice not be more along the lines of quartz vs mechanical, rather than automatic vs hand-wound?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    You're correct that a quartz would solve the issues I outlined, but unfortunately doesn't when personal taste is involved. I prefer mechanical watches and enjoy the sweeping movement of the second hand rather than the 'tick-tick' movement of a quartz analogue watch. I have a quartz g-shock digital watch that I am happy with, but don't want another.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    I know how you feel - I prefer autos too and despite having a watchwinder, I've just come to accept that I'll have to set the time if it's not been in use for a while.

    Hamilton are a nice brand, but I don't think you'd get an auto in budget, and I'm not sure if they tend to do many divers.

    Of the 2 above, I much prefer the first one. I think the reserve is supposed to be around 2 days, but I imagine that'll depend on how active you are on the days you wear it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    I have two automatic watches (Seiko & Orient) that don't handwind at all and I know where you're coming from :D

    I always feel like an eejit, sitting there, shaking the watch to get it going, setting it, shaking it some more etc ...winding by hand is so much easier.

    Plus the other thing is that while the watch does get going after a few shakes it only has very low power to start with which means for a while the balance doesn't reach its full amplitude and it runs fast ...bit of a bummer when you're just after setting it.

    My Orient has a power reserve display and according to that I need to shake it for a good 10 mins to build up half the power reserve.


    The power reserve of the Seiko 7S26 movement is about 36 - 40 hours ...in theory wearing it every other day should work. Problem is though (as my trusty power reserve indicator tells me) if you only shake the watch a bit to get it going and then spend your day at a desk and lounging about in the evening you'll never build up the full power ...more like half only ...so it wouldn't last until the day after tomorrow :D


    Other than looking for a Seiko WITH handwinding capabilities you could also consider Citizen ...their base line 82XX movement also handwinds. The same goes for anything powered by a Miyota 8215 ...which is the same as the Citizen movement


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭emo72


    if you wear the 007 every second day it will keep running. mine has still been running after 2 days of being left off.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    emo72 wrote: »
    if you wear the 007 every second day it will keep running. mine has still been running after 2 days of being left off.

    Good stuff Emo, that's good to know. I wear my watch on my right (most active) hand and will wear on the data I go swimming so it should get a good shaking in the wear day's.
    2 questions - what strap are you using? I'm thinking of the silicon one as I've heard bad reports of the standard rubber.
    Also, does it wear big? Could I wear under a shirt with cuff links?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    peasant wrote: »
    I have two automatic watches (Seiko & Orient) that don't handwind at all and I know where you're coming from :D

    I always feel like an eejit, sitting there, shaking the watch to get it going, setting it, shaking it some more etc ...winding by hand is so much easier.

    Plus the other thing is that while the watch does get going after a few shakes it only has very low power to start with which means for a while the balance doesn't reach its full amplitude and it runs fast ...bit of a bummer when you're just after setting it.

    My Orient has a power reserve display and according to that I need to shake it for a good 10 mins to build up half the power reserve.


    The power reserve of the Seiko 7S26 movement is about 36 - 40 hours ...in theory wearing it every other day should work. Problem is though (as my trusty power reserve indicator tells me) if you only shake the watch a bit to get it going and then spend your day at a desk and lounging about in the evening you'll never build up the full power ...more like half only ...so it wouldn't last until the day after tomorrow :D


    Other than looking for a Seiko WITH handwinding capabilities you could also consider Citizen ...their base line 82XX movement also handwinds. The same goes for anything powered by a Miyota 8215 ...which is the same as the Citizen movement

    Thanks Peasent - for some reason, though they're quite similar, I don't want a citizen. What Orient do you have? How does it compare quality wise against your Seiko?
    In searching lastnight I landed somehow on the deep blue website. They have some lovely pieces with a range of movement and good mysterious depth (and serious divers undoubtedly). Unfortunately out of my range right now !- have you any experience of them? It can be my upgrade maybe...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    They have some lovely pieces with a range of movement and good mysterious depth (and serious divers undoubtedly).

    Not sure how predictive text made 'mysterious' from 'serious' but it did:$


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭emo72


    The stock rubber is very hard. I didn't like it. I use a mesh. Much more comfortable. It would fit under a shirt easy. It's one of my smaller watches.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    They have some lovely pieces with a range of movement and good mysterious depth (and serious divers undoubtedly).

    Not sure how predictive text made 'mysterious' from 'serious' but it did:$


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    emo72 wrote: »
    The stock rubber is very hard. I didn't like it. I use a mesh. Much more comfortable. It would fit under a shirt easy. It's one of my smaller watches.

    Cool, thanks for that Emo. Think I'll go for silicone as it will be getting wet and I imagine mesh would hold moisture a bit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    emo72 wrote: »
    The stock rubber is very hard. I didn't like it. I use a mesh. Much more comfortable. It would fit under a shirt easy. It's one of my smaller watches.

    Cool, thanks for that Emo. Think I'll go for silicone as it will be getting wet and I imagine mesh would hold moisture a bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 234 ✭✭Orlaw3136


    If its the handwind feature you are prioritising, within your budget, you should check out anything which has the 4r36 movement (a number of Seiko 5 divers have it, so does SRP324, SRP227, so do a few Seiko 'Premier' divers.

    For a little more wedge, you can get something with the 6r15 movement (a Sumo for instance...but that is quite a bit above your budget).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    Orlaw3136 wrote: »
    If its the handwind feature you are prioritising, within your budget, you should check out anything which has the 4r36 movement (a number of Seiko 5 divers have it, so does SRP324, SRP227, so do a few Seiko 'Premier' divers.

    For a little more wedge, you can get something with the 6r15 movement (a Sumo for instance...but that is quite a bit above your budget).




    I am looking for nirvana -


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    I am looking for nirvana - an Skx with the 4r36 movement. Priority is a diver rather than 'sport' with a simple face, good lume and hand wind option. And has to be cheap. And be accurate. And rugged. And look good. Simples :-D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    While you're tearing your hair rooting through Seiko's offerings, may I suggest something completely different?

    Sapphire glass
    200 m water resistant
    very good lume
    Hand wind and second stop movement (Seagull)
    Very accurate (mine runs within 3 seconds per day or less)
    Price ca 225 Euro

    http://sklep.gerlach.org.pl/index.php?route=product/category&path=59

    The design ...you either love it or hate it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭93Cab


    10% discount code on WUS for Gerlach in October!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    Really like that Gerlach, and it ticks all my boxes! Unfortunately / fortunately an Skx007k came up on Adverts lastnight and I bought. Am collecting Mon / Tue - looking forward to getting my hands on it now. If it doesn't pan out, will definitely be looking at the Gerlach in earnest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    Really like that Gerlach, and it ticks all my boxes! Unfortunately / fortunately an Skx007k came up on Adverts lastnight and I bought. Am collecting Mon / Tue - looking forward to getting my hands on it now. If it doesn't pan out, will definitely be looking at the Gerlach in earnest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    Got my Skx007k lastnight and am very happy with it. Was boxed and unworn and started with a few shakes. It seems to have kept good time overnight but will keep an eye on it and plan to wear it constantly for a few weeks.
    Quick question - is good/bad/makes no difference to wear an automatic to bed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Anjobe


    GG21057 wrote: »
    Got my Skx007k lastnight and am very happy with it. Was boxed and unworn and started with a few shakes. It seems to have kept good time overnight but will keep an eye on it and plan to wear it constantly for a few weeks.
    Quick question - is good/bad/makes no difference to wear an automatic to bed?

    For a big tough diver's watch it makes no difference, whatever you're most comfortable with.

    For a less robust, dress type watch I would be a bit concerned about rolling over on it and damaging it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    Anjobe wrote: »
    For a big tough diver's watch it makes no difference, whatever you're most comfortable with.

    For a less robust, dress type watch I would be a bit concerned about rolling over on it and damaging it.

    Cheers, I thought as much. I can't see my nocturnal activities damaging something as tough as the Seiko! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭GG21057


    T


Advertisement