9/11 Flight 175 cgi glitch ?

Daithi 1

I hate to bring this up, I know everyone's probably bored to death with it so I'll just make it quick..

I came across this and thought. hmm maybe it's just this version that's been edited so I had a search around and it seems every copy of flight 175 has the same anomoly...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UOyPapgM_4

Again

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

Again @ 3:20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=huK0MAb0Xa4#t=196

Several times in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHHghW4Pg5k

Daithi 1

Forget it, lol.. The building is in front of the wing duh !

NicoleL88

You can see pixels coming off the wing/building before and after the wing passes through it. Looks a bit odd.

Edit: Actually upon viewing the third link, I agree that the building is definitely in front of the plane and not behind the South Tower.

BloodBath

That video has been run through software to give it a higher frame rate than the original source. It creates artificial frames based on the frames preceding and following it. That can't be taken as a reliable source of anything.

This is the kind of nonsense that needs to be stamped out. I can't believe "people" are still suggesting there were no planes despite hundreds of witnesses and several camera shots all corresponding with each other and damage on the surface corresponding perfectly to the planes that hit it.

It's beyond ridiculous.

claypigeon777

The jet DID slice through the steel structure.

This is a photo of the damage to WTC 2 and you can clearly see the outline of the jet in the structure.



The wings were full of fuel and the plane was travelling at hundreds of miles per hour when it impacted.

The building in the foreground is clearly in between the camera and the WTC towers.

Daithi 1

Wings full of fuel ?

claypigeon777

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Wings full of fuel ?

A jet airliner has fuel tanks in its wings.

dlouth15

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Wings full of fuel ?

claypigeon777 wrote: »

A jet airliner has fuel tanks in its wings.

Yes, and it had been fuelled for a flight from Boston to Los Angeles so the wing tanks would have been pretty full at that point.

claypigeon777

dlouth15 wrote: »

Yes, and it had been fuelled for a flight from Boston to Los Angeles so the wing tanks would have been pretty full at that point.

Those fuel laden wings were travelling at hundreds of miles per hour when they slammed into the metal structure.

NIMAN

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Wings full of fuel ?

If you don't even know the basic fact that planes carry fuel in their wings these days, then maybe you should stop posting nonsense and CGI and a major tragedy.

Daithi 1

Or maybe I should post whatever I like to post.. Yes, that sounds good to me.
It was a reasonable question to ask. I imagine a lot of people were tricked by it. I wasn't questioning the part about the plane slicing through the building, I have no issue with that, fuel in the wings or not.

Torakx

Agression like that keeps people away from this discussion, I guess that is the idea...