Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

9/11 Flight 175 cgi glitch ?

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    Forget it, lol.. The building is in front of the wing duh !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 430 ✭✭NicoleL88


    You can see pixels coming off the wing/building before and after the wing passes through it. Looks a bit odd.

    Edit: Actually upon viewing the third link, I agree that the building is definitely in front of the plane and not behind the South Tower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,283 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    That video has been run through software to give it a higher frame rate than the original source. It creates artificial frames based on the frames preceding and following it. That can't be taken as a reliable source of anything.

    This is the kind of nonsense that needs to be stamped out. I can't believe "people" are still suggesting there were no planes despite hundreds of witnesses and several camera shots all corresponding with each other and damage on the surface corresponding perfectly to the planes that hit it.

    It's beyond ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭claypigeon777


    The jet DID slice through the steel structure.

    This is a photo of the damage to WTC 2 and you can clearly see the outline of the jet in the structure.

    fig-2-15.jpg

    The wings were full of fuel and the plane was travelling at hundreds of miles per hour when it impacted.

    The building in the foreground is clearly in between the camera and the WTC towers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    Wings full of fuel ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭claypigeon777


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    Wings full of fuel ?

    A jet airliner has fuel tanks in its wings.

    757_Fuel_System.JPG?1369444304


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭dlouth15


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    Wings full of fuel ?
    A jet airliner has fuel tanks in its wings.
    Yes, and it had been fuelled for a flight from Boston to Los Angeles so the wing tanks would have been pretty full at that point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭claypigeon777


    dlouth15 wrote: »
    Yes, and it had been fuelled for a flight from Boston to Los Angeles so the wing tanks would have been pretty full at that point.

    Those fuel laden wings were travelling at hundreds of miles per hour when they slammed into the metal structure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,148 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    Wings full of fuel ?

    If you don't even know the basic fact that planes carry fuel in their wings these days, then maybe you should stop posting nonsense and CGI and a major tragedy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    Or maybe I should post whatever I like to post.. Yes, that sounds good to me.
    It was a reasonable question to ask. I imagine a lot of people were tricked by it. I wasn't questioning the part about the plane slicing through the building, I have no issue with that, fuel in the wings or not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    Agression like that keeps people away from this discussion, I guess that is the idea...


Advertisement