Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Thai Airways A330 Crash Lands Bangkok Airport

  • 08-09-2013 9:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭


    FlightRadar24 reports that Thai Airways flight #TG679 from Guangzhou, China to Suvarnabhumi Airport BKK in Bangkok, Thailand has crash landed.

    The plane, an Airbus A330, is seen on the picture at #BKK with the emergency slides deployed. However, it's unknown what caused the crash landing.

    12 passengers are injured. No fatalities reported yet.
    Looks like it over ran the runway.

    Some pics attached.

    Update: A Thai Airways Airbus A330-300, registration HS-TEF performing flight TG-679 from Guangzhou (China) to Bangkok (Thailand) with 301 people on board, landed on Bangkok's runway 19L at about 23:30L (16:30Z) but veered right off the runway and came to a stop with all gear on soft ground, a large plume of dust rose above the aircraft initially creating fears of a crash. The aircraft was evacuated via slides. 12 people received minor injuries in the evacuation, the aircraft received damage to both engines and the nose gear.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭Dogwatch


    Seems it landed and slid off the runway onto soft ground........http://avherald.com/h?article=4681fccd&opt=1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    Hopefully that's #3 of 3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,561 ✭✭✭andy_g


    Sounds familiar could of been a similar problem on the nose gear.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    They wasted no time in painting over the tail logo


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    keith16 wrote: »
    They wasted no time in painting over the tail logo

    A bit fecking pointless with such an unique livery....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    Tenger wrote: »
    A bit fecking pointless with such an unique livery....

    Agreed. Although the instruction came from Star Alliance apparently. They are probably drawing more attention to themselves with this if anything.

    Decxp0W.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭BuffyBot


    I doubt the painting over is anything to do with the Star Alliance: many airlines have done the same over the years (SAS did the same after SK 751)

    http://www.inaviation.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Sas_flight_751_crash.jpg

    Other examples

    http://www.abpic.co.uk/photo/1026785/
    http://www.airliners.net/photo/1032098/M/

    While some might recognise the livery, companies know that the majority of the general public are more likely to remember the logo/name of the airline than a paint job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,142 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    BuffyBot wrote: »
    I doubt the painting over is anything to do with the Star Alliance: many airlines have done the same over the years (SAS did the same after SK 751)

    SAS are Star also :pac:

    (yes, I know its standard practice for pretty much every airline)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭BuffyBot


    MYOB wrote: »
    SAS are Star also :pac:

    (yes, I know its standard practice for pretty much every airline)

    Not in 1991, when flight 751 crashed, as Star didn't even exist then ;) </pedant>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,142 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Good point.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement