Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ham Hill, Somerset.

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Some disturbing evidence there indeed, but not from the eidence of 'fine cut marks' or 'disarticulated skulls' [?]

    The re-writing of the history of Britain is what disturbs me - the Romans arrived, under J. Caesar, in 55BC, not 100BC. His memoirs document the timing precisely - but it was not an invasion, more of a reconnaissance. The actual invasion, planned and put off three times interim, did not take place until 44AD.

    tac


Advertisement