Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Building over transport infrastructure?

Comments

  • #2
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,288 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The issue right now is that there is a glut of office space available on the market already.


  • #3
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    lxflyer wrote: »
    The issue right now is that there is a glut of office space available on the market already.

    That might be the case at the current time, in the middle of a recession. But the overall concept is very sound in the long term.

    Ideally with public transport, you want the stations and transport hubs to be as close to the heart of the city (shopping and business districts) as possible, as this is where people want to go.

    But of course being at the heart of the city, they also represent the most valuable land.

    It makes perfect sense to make the most of this space by building the stations and transport hubs in the first few floors and then building, office space, retail shopping space, hotels and even apartments on the floors above them.

    Also by doing this, the floors above can finance the building of large modern public transport infrastructure below.


  • #4
    flyingsnail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    Wasn’t there plans a few years ago to do something like that over Tara Street


  • #5
    hardCopy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    Busaras has the Department of Social Protection upstairs. No point wasting footprint in the city.


  • #6
    Shedite27
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,469 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    I used to work in the Vancouver Department of Transport (Translink). They went one step further and bought up land around areas they knew they would be announcing subway stations in the next year. They then built the subway, built accomodations/offices around the stations, and made enough profit to go towards the cost of the development. They had their own Real Estate division. Still in property boom over there tho.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    hardCopy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    Do we have a concept of "air-rights" like they have in the States? IE could make some money by allowing construction above their tracks, if city centre land ever becomes scarce again.

    http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/21649389-418/new-plans-for-450m-downtown-office-tower-over-railroad-tracks-on-river.html


  • #8
    circadian
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,222 ✭✭✭circadian


    Shedite27 wrote: »
    I used to work in the Vancouver Department of Transport (Translink). They went one step further and bought up land around areas they knew they would be announcing subway stations in the next year. They then built the subway, built accomodations/offices around the stations, and made enough profit to go towards the cost of the development. They had their own Real Estate division. Still in property boom over there tho.

    Yeah the rate an apartment block goes up is unreal. Most skytrain stations especially in Burnaby have this type of development (and Starbucks of course). It seems to work well.


  • #9
    n97 mini
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Why just commercial? Why not residential too.


  • #10
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,288 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There are plans to redevelop Tara Street and Connolly in Dublin, and to build a new bus station in Galway which would incorporate a bigger rail station, which all encompass fairly major property developments, but all of them have been on hold with the recession.


  • #11
    ballooba
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭ballooba


    hardCopy wrote: »
    Busaras has the Department of Social Protection upstairs. No point wasting footprint in the city.
    Seeing as their customer base is almost exactly the same...


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    hmmm
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Why not just build these things underground like a lot of North American cities? Then make sure to stick them in the middle of the city where people want to go.


  • #13
    dowlingm
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    the history of CIE and property development (Kent Station, Tara Street, Treasury Holdings/Docklands) isn't cheering.

    MTR Hong Kong is one of the better known property players in the transport game.


  • #14
    KCAccidental
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    ballooba wrote: »
    Seeing as their customer base is almost exactly the same...

    charming


  • #15
    ballooba
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭ballooba


    KCAccidental wrote: »
    charming
    My post was in slightly bad taste. And yes, its off topic. Apologies for any offence caused.


  • #16
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    There is an example of this in south Dublin at Balally Luas station. The station is in a cutting (like Kilmacud station just down the line), and this cutting has been turned into a type of "bowl" with commercial space at the lower levels, and then a residential building several storeys high over the tracks. It's not perfect, but it's a clever way of intensifying landuse in and over a station, while still allowing natural light and ventilation on the platforms. It's a little bit higgledy-piggledy especially considering it was built from scratch, but I think it's a good model that could be improved upon for other rail stations in the city.


  • #17
    danotroy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 556 ✭✭✭danotroy


    hardCopy wrote: »
    Do we have a concept of "air-rights" like they have in the States? IE could make some money by allowing construction above their tracks, if city centre land ever becomes scarce again.

    http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/21649389-418/new-plans-for-450m-downtown-office-tower-over-railroad-tracks-on-river.html

    Here in Melbourne Metro have a huge CBD plot above their rail lines into Flinders st station. They recently held an brainstorming informal session with developers, the city and other interested parties as to the future of the site.


  • #18
    Grandeeod
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,310 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    Spencer Dock.

    The biggest example of how CIE failed to intergrate a valuable rail site with commercial development.


  • #19
    n97 mini
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    hardCopy wrote: »
    Do we have a concept of "air-rights" like they have in the States? IE could make some money by allowing construction above their tracks, if city centre land ever becomes scarce again.

    http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/21649389-418/new-plans-for-450m-downtown-office-tower-over-railroad-tracks-on-river.html

    Manchester Arena is built over Victoria Station.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Arena


Advertisement