Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Should I taper for shorter races during a marathon program?

  • 27-08-2013 4:11pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭


    Hi, I was looking for advice on the pro's and cons of tapering for say a 10k race in week 9 of a marathon program.

    I am trying to go sub 3 in DCM this year and am following a tough 110k+ weekly program to try and achieve this. I however made a spontaneous decision there last week to run in the greatpinkrun 10k as I thought trying to go sub 40 running along side one of my idols Sonia O Sullivan was to good an opportunity to pass up.

    Issue is if I train according to my program I know come Saturday I am going to be very heavy legged and won't be at my optimum for the 10k. I am considering tapering by dropping a tough lactate threshold session on Thursday.

    My main priority is to get sub 3 in October but sub 40 is a strong secondary objective id like to achieve. Guess what I want to know is, would dropping a key session like a LT significantly affect my chances of sub3 or could I get away with it.

    Thanks!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,549 ✭✭✭✭Krusty_Clown


    Sounds like you are following a P&D plan. I would think that the 10k at race pace would be a perfectly good substitute for your LT session (while not fullfilling exactly the same goals). In fact, in the P&D plans, there are occasional tune-up races, where you might have a couple of easy days beforehand (and a long run the subsequent day). By the way, if sub-3 is a goal, then cracking 40 mins for 10k should be pretty achievable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭sub3wannabe


    Sounds like you are following a P&D plan. I would think that the 10k at race pace would be a perfectly good substitute for your LT session (while not fullfilling exactly the same goals). In fact, in the P&D plans, there are occasional tune-up races, where you might have a couple of easy days beforehand (and a long run the subsequent day). By the way, if sub-3 is a goal, then cracking 40 mins for 10k should be pretty achievable.

    That's put my mind at rest somewhat Krusty, thanks. A speedy 10k isn't a bad substitute for an LT session when you think about it.

    Should I do my LSR on Sunday as normal would you think or maybe move it to Monday?, that's what I was thinking of doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,549 ✭✭✭✭Krusty_Clown


    That's put my mind at rest somewhat Krusty, thanks. A speedy 10k isn't a bad substitute for an LT session when you think about it.

    Should I do my LSR on Sunday as normal would you think or maybe move it to Monday?, that's what I was thinking of doing.
    Is it actually a P&D plan you are following? If so, there are tune-up races which you are supposed to follow with a long run. You could substitute the 10k/long run for one of these tune-up races.

    I've done the tune-up race/long run double whammy a few times, and it's a pretty tough combination (and I reckon does increase your potential for injury), but it also meets the expected goal, which is to get you doing a long run when the body is pretty depleted and you're feeling very tired. Best thing to do is assess the day after the race, and see if you are physically capable of doing a long run without creating a risk of injury, or postponing it until you can do it without that risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭hypersonic


    would 10km race pace not be a good bit higher than LT pace?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,549 ✭✭✭✭Krusty_Clown


    hypersonic wrote: »
    would 10km race pace not be a good bit higher than LT pace?

    If by 'higher' you mean 'faster', then yes. As I said, it has slightly different goals, but will provide benefit. Lonely is the marathon training program that doesn't have tune up races.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    Lonely is the marathon training program that doesn't have tune up races.

    Very profound for that time of morning!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 851 ✭✭✭thewolf_ie


    I didn't taper on half marathon or 10 mile races so far while training for DCM 2013. I might not run the day before or switch rest days etc.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 41 pico84


    sub 40 at this stage with a sub 3 aim in October should be very achievable.
    It shouldn't be the kind of run that will take too much out of you if you're at a sub 3 level of fitness so the taper shouldnt be necessary


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭sub3wannabe


    pico84 wrote: »
    sub 40 at this stage with a sub 3 aim in October should be very achievable.
    It shouldn't be the kind of run that will take too much out of you if you're at a sub 3 level of fitness so the taper shouldn't be necessary

    It's not the aftermath I'm worried about it's the tiredness from the proposed LT on Thursday. For some reason I'm always very stiff and sore after these, I think its because I never did much speed training for past marathons and thus am a bit behind on this aspect of my athleticism.

    I know sub 40 in theory should be a walk in the park. (McMillan Calculator) says I should be running 38:xx but am still a bit apprehensive!

    Thanks for all the advice though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,549 ✭✭✭✭Krusty_Clown


    I know sub 40 in theory should be a walk in the park. (McMillan Calculator) says I should be running 38:xx but am still a bit apprehensive!
    It shouldn't be a walk in the park, but it should be achievable. Remember, you're training for a marathon, not for a 10k, so whether you get your sub 40 or not, is largely irrelevant. Eyes on the prize.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 41 pico84


    It shouldn't be a walk in the park, but it should be achievable. Remember, you're training for a marathon, not for a 10k, so whether you get your sub 40 or not, is largely irrelevant. Eyes on the prize.

    Big time the sub 40 is nice for a big of confidence but as krusty said the marathon is the goal at the end of the day


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭sub3wannabe


    pico84 wrote: »
    Big time the sub 40 is nice for a big of confidence but as krusty said the marathon is the goal at the end of the day

    You're both right. I have nothing to lose really!


Advertisement