9/11 Revisited: Live Mainstream Media Coverage Conflicts with Official Story

Brown Bomber

This is an interesting video. Someone recorded local news reports on 911 on a single VHS tape,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvLwQiwZAoY

alastair

I'd have said this was a rather uninteresting video. Unless incorrect reports in a confused situation have suddenly become noteworthy. The NORAD and air traffic control recordings show equal confusion on the day.

The video begs the question of why did they claim there were 8 planes hijacked?

Were they told to tell a different story to the rest of the media? If so, what benefit would that be?
Was it that a random reporter from a local news station was somehow able to get to the truth hours after the attack were every other reporter on the planet could not? And if that is the case and that is the truth, why were there 8 planes hijacked and what happened to them?

Or could it be that the reporter like many others that day made a mistake and jumped on unconfirmed reports prematurely in the confusion of the day, hoping to get a scoop?

The video doesn't conflict with the official story at all as long as you realise that people and organisations make mistakes, which you must to hold the idea that the conspirators mistakenly allowed this report to get out.
But as with many of the holes that people try to poke in the official story, there is no coherent, sane or plausible alternative explanation.

Dude111

Yes but THAT MANY MISTAKES??

You can see right thru this if your awake!

Dude111

Dude111 wrote: »

Yes but THAT MANY MISTAKES??

Yes.
Reporters jumping on unconfirmed reports during a giant, confusing news day is a very reasonable explanation.
It is far more reasonable than the complete lack of an explanation that indicates or supports a conspiracy?

Dude111 wrote: »

You can see right thru this if your awake!

Ok then can you please explain the obvious to those of us who aren't awake?

Why does this report that conflicts with the official story exist?

Was this local news station told to say all of these things? If so, why?

Were they the only ones who somehow had access to the truth? If so, why weren't they stopped and how did they get this information?

Zarak12

Brown Bomber wrote: »

This is an interesting video. Someone recorded local news reports on 911 on a single VHS tape,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvLwQiwZAoY

You mean local news affiliates without major resources got factual errors during a national crisis. I'm shocked! SHOCKED. No wait, what's the word "non plussed".

I'd be surprised if there WASN'T a slew of errors that day. In fact that'd be a way to make me a suspicious that it was a inside job.

Consider if the news all reported the exact same facts with the exact same talking points, phrases etc, all used the same government sound bites, then I'd think someone was controlling the media and telling them what to report.

A Primal Nut

If the conspiracy was real and everything was planned out in advance (i.e. official story false) I would expect less mistakes then if the conspiracy was fake (official story true) and the news were trying their best to report facts on the ground.