Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why do America fare so poorly at the Ryder Cup?

  • 12-08-2013 10:12PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭


    I was just looking at recent history of the Ryder Cup, Europe have now won 7 out the last 9 Ryder Cups, stretching back to 1993.

    However America since this very same period have won 45 majors and european golfers, just 13, whats wrong? :confused:

    Also that era of winning 7 out of the last 9 Ryder Cups also includes facing Mickelson and Tiger Woods, between them have 19 majors!!
     

    I used to hear Sky and Monty say time and time again everytime I watch their coverage that Ryder Cup success consistantly proves European golf is stronger than American golf, ok if so, why is the european major count so low compared to the American one?

    I mean I'm sure Europe will continue to dominate the Ryder Cup and will win it again next year, but I just can't get my head around it?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 344 ✭✭cormacjones


    I was just looking at recent history of the Ryder Cup, Europe have now won 7 out the last 9 Ryder Cups, stretching back to 1993.

    However America since this very same period have won 45 majors and european golfers, just 13, whats wrong? :confused:

    Also that era of winning 7 out of the last 9 Ryder Cups also includes facing Mickelson and Tiger Woods, between them have 19 majors!!
     

    I used to hear Sky and Monty say time and time again everytime I watch their coverage that Ryder Cup success consistantly proves European golf is stronger than American golf, ok if so, why is the european major count so low compared to the American one?

    I mean I'm sure Europe will continue to dominate the Ryder Cup and will win it again next year, but I just can't get my head around it?


    I don't think I've ever heard Monty or Sky say European Golf is stronger. I don't think even Monty is that blinkered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,599 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    I don't think I've ever heard Monty or Sky say European Golf is stronger. I don't think even Monty is that blinkered.

    I think i've heard monty say that he's stronger...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭lowelife


    I think i've heard monty say that he's stronger...

    For those people that never got to watch the last Ryder Cup, Monty is very coy about it and doesnt like to talk about how he won it as both player and captain


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭PRAF


    I was just looking at recent history of the Ryder Cup, Europe have now won 7 out the last 9 Ryder Cups, stretching back to 1993.

    However America since this very same period have won 45 majors and european golfers, just 13, whats wrong? :confused:

    Also that era of winning 7 out of the last 9 Ryder Cups also includes facing Mickelson and Tiger Woods, between them have 19 majors!!
     

    I used to hear Sky and Monty say time and time again everytime I watch their coverage that Ryder Cup success consistantly proves European golf is stronger than American golf, ok if so, why is the european major count so low compared to the American one?

    I mean I'm sure Europe will continue to dominate the Ryder Cup and will win it again next year, but I just can't get my head around it?

    And out of Europe's last 13 majors, Ireland have picked up 7 of them!!! Sometimes its easy to forget how spectacularly successful golfers born & bred on this island have been in world golf. It's a credit to the players but also to club golf in Ireland, the coaches, and the GUI.

    But back to the OP - I doubt anyone seriously believes that European golf is stronger than US golf. They still have the best tour, the best college system, the best players, etc. However, they do lack variety in the courses and conditions that they play. They also lack comraderie and teamwork.

    One of the reasons that the Europeans have been so successful against the US in recent years is that European players have more variety in their game, are used to playing on different types of courses and in different types of weather, and most importantly they all seem to get on well together (except for Harro & Garcia!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭PRAF


    lowelife wrote: »
    For those people that never got to watch the last Ryder Cup, Monty is very coy about it and doesnt like to talk about how he won it as both player and captain

    Monty was a fierce competitor in the Ryder Cup, one of the greatest of all time IMO. Pity he couldn't recreate that form in the majors. Poulter is probably the modern day equivalent although I don't think Poults is as good a golfer as Monty was in his heyday.

    Anyway, I wouldn't begrudge Monty holding onto a few of his secrets. I just hope he lets McGinley know what they were so he can recreate it next year!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I was just looking at recent history of the Ryder Cup, Europe have now won 7 out the last 9 Ryder Cups, stretching back to 1993.

    However America since this very same period have won 45 majors and european golfers, just 13, whats wrong? :confused:

    It's not a case of "whats wrong" with the major figures.

    I think the major figures give a fair representation of where the two sides are and have been since 1993.
    Over the period, the US are stronger, they have better players and a lot more of them. A lot more better players equals a lot more chance of winning.
    They also have Tiger, a phenomena, winning more Majors than all of Europe during this period which helps....he's almost makes up for 1 in every 3 of the US Major wins during that period which is pretty crazy since he wasn't even playing for the first 3-4 years of that period, and hasn't won one in the last 5 years.

    This is becoming less of a point up until relatively recently as more Europeans are locating in the US but:
    3 out of 4 Majors are held in the US which also gives them the advantage.
    The European Major being a links doesn't necessarily suit all European players.

    So if nothing is really going wrong with the Majors as I feel...Then, something has to be going right with the Ryder Cup!

    I could go into detail, but quite simply it's a different ball game altogether.
    It's a team event and Europe seem to have proven a better team.
    As it's limited to the "best" 12 golfers from each team, the overall gap between Europe and the US is bridged, maybe swayed sometimes.
    Europe don't have the strength in dept that the US have (this strength in dept can produce Major winners) but that doesn't really come into it when they are limited to the best 12.
    Also that era of winning 7 out of the last 9 Ryder Cups also includes facing Mickelson and Tiger Woods, between them have 19 majors!!

    They are only ever 2 players on a 12 man team. It's great to have them but there are other factors. Tiger for one, isn't know as the best team player, does he unsettle the camp etc etc?
     
    I used to hear Sky and Monty say time and time again everytime I watch their coverage that Ryder Cup success consistantly proves European golf is stronger than American golf, ok if so, why is the european major count so low compared to the American one?

    No comment :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,321 ✭✭✭Martin567


    PRAF wrote: »
    One of the reasons that the Europeans have been so successful against the US in recent years is that European players have more variety in their game, are used to playing on different types of courses and in different types of weather, and most importantly they all seem to get on well together (except for Harro & Garcia!)

    I'm not sure how true this is anymore. As has been said on the other thread, it seems as though Westwood is not so friendly with McIlroy right now and he did indicate that Rose's major win meant very little to him. Also, the relationship between McGinley and Clarke is clearly very strained. I think that's mostly Darren's fault but I get the impression from a few recent comments from McGinley that he won't be calling for a chat anytime soon. I could be wrong but Darren can probably forget about being a vice-captain next year. Padraig is a more likely candidate for that role at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Derek Zoolander


    pretty simple really the americans don't really care about the Ryder Cup. You'll get the occasional Boo Weekly, Bubba Watson or Keegan Bradley who seem to care, but as a whole it ranks right up there with Presidents Cup -


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 863 ✭✭✭Ronney


    I think you have to count experience as a key factor too. Due to the smaller number of top class players in europe, players tend to have played/been involved in a lot more ryder cups.

    Just compare the teams from the K Club

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Ryder_Cup

    Any of the Europeans not still involved in a playing capacity are involved in the management side.

    On the US there are a good few where are they now types?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,321 ✭✭✭Martin567


    Ronney wrote: »
    I think you have to count experience as a key factor too. Due to the smaller number of top class players in europe, players tend to have played/been involved in a lot more ryder cups.

    Just compare the teams from the K Club

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Ryder_Cup

    Any of the Europeans not still involved in a playing capacity are involved in the management side.

    On the US there are a good few where are they now types?

    In fairness, 2006 was probably the worst US Ryder Cup team ever. They changed their whole qualifying system after that year. Up to then, they only allocated points to those who finished in the Top 10 each week and they gave huge numbers of points to tournament winners. The result was that random players who had one or two really good weeks were getting in ahead of far more consistent players who hadn't managed to win.

    I always thought Lehman was a far superior captain to Woosnam but the difference in quality of the two teams was just far too big for that to matter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭stockdam


    Major winners is not representative and I'm not sure why anyone would think it is.

    Look at the top 50 golfers in the world and it's something like 23-21 for the USA against Europe. That's a better indication of the strength of the respective teams. In fact the Europeans just about shade it in the top 20.......well it's about even again.

    Hence the two teams should be fairly evenly matched at present.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭realgolfgeek


    pretty simple really the americans don't really care about the Ryder Cup. You'll get the occasional Boo Weekly, Bubba Watson or Keegan Bradley who seem to care, but as a whole it ranks right up there with Presidents Cup -

    I think you hit the nail on the head there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,078 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    pretty simple really the americans don't really care about the Ryder Cup. You'll get the occasional Boo Weekly, Bubba Watson or Keegan Bradley who seem to care, but as a whole it ranks right up there with Presidents Cup -

    This is the answer I always give too.

    Woods especially doesn't care, and why should he? Same probably goes for McIlroy at this stage. There comes a point where some players are above it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,469 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    I think for Ryder cup points purposes winning shouldn't be worth way more than second.
    e.g if first is 100 points then second should be 99 and so on.
    otherwise there is to much of a premium on winning an individual tournament which trashy had no indication on a player's typical performance.

    coming second in a tournament isn't that much worse than winning, edpecially in match play format imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭cornerboy


    pretty simple really the americans don't really care about the Ryder Cup. You'll get the occasional Boo Weekly, Bubba Watson or Keegan Bradley who seem to care, but as a whole it ranks right up there with Presidents Cup -

    They would care if they were winning it all the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭PAULWATSON


    they don't give a damn.

    Those boys play for dollar bills, not slaps on the back after exhibition matches!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭cornerboy


    PAULWATSON wrote: »
    they don't give a damn.

    Those boys play for dollar bills, not slaps on the back after exhibition matches!

    Money motivates you to go to work.....it doesn't make you perform.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 442 ✭✭Jack Kyle


    Remember Woods was asked at a WGC event before a Ryder Cup which event he'd prefer to win?

    Journalist asked any particular reason.

    Woods replied that he could think of a million reasons (1st prize was $1m).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,469 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Jack Kyle wrote: »
    Remember Woods was asked at a WGC event before a Ryder Cup which event he'd prefer to win?

    Journalist asked any particular reason.

    Woods replied that he could think of a million reasons (1st prize was $1m).

    wasn't that more about points for winning?
    I don't think tiger needs cash...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 442 ✭✭Jack Kyle


    GreeBo wrote: »
    wasn't that more about points for winning?
    I don't think tiger needs cash...

    No, it was cash.

    Tiger is supposed to be one of the meanest guys around.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,469 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Jack Kyle wrote: »
    No, it was cash.

    Tiger is supposed to be one of the meanest guys around.

    sorry, didn't realise that you knew him personally.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 442 ✭✭Jack Kyle


    GreeBo wrote: »
    sorry, didn't realise that you knew him personally.

    Does being a moderator give you the right to post sarcastically and confrontationally?

    I've met Tiger Woods. Have you? One of my closest friends played golf with Tiger Woods and had lunch with him. Another of my friends caddied for him. Both have testified regarding his frugality.

    If you the moderator for a golf thread you should know about Woods' reputation. His tightness is as well documented as Mickelson's ridiculous generosity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Derek Zoolander


    Jack Kyle wrote: »
    Does being a moderator give you the right to post sarcastically and confrontationally?

    I've met Tiger Woods. Have you? One of my closest friends played golf with Tiger Woods and had lunch with him. Another of my friends caddied for him. Both have testified regarding his frugality.

    If you the moderator for a golf thread you should know about Woods' reputation. His tightness is as well documented as Mickelson's ridiculous generosity.

    http://www.frugallyminded.com/entertainment/best-known-cheap-or-frugal-celebrities/

    Q.E.D.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭PAULWATSON


    GreeBo wrote: »
    sorry, didn't realise that you knew him personally.

    maybe he read haney's book!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,469 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Jack Kyle wrote: »
    Does being a moderator give you the right to post sarcastically and confrontationally?

    I've met Tiger Woods. Have you? One of my closest friends played golf with Tiger Woods and had lunch with him. Another of my friends caddied for him. Both have testified regarding his frugality.

    If you the moderator for a golf thread you should know about Woods' reputation. His tightness is as well documented as Mickelson's ridiculous generosity.

    ah the old "as a moderator" argument, nice.

    frugality does not mean he only plays to win cash.

    and just because it's on the internet doesn't make something true.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 442 ✭✭Jack Kyle


    GreeBo wrote: »
    ah the old "as a moderator" argument, nice.

    frugality does not mean he only plays to win cash.

    and just because it's on the internet doesn't make something true.

    You're wrong on a number of counts.

    Woods said that there were "a million reasons" why he'd prefer to win a WGC event rather than the Ryder Cup.

    Woods is widely ackowledged as being mean. I'm surprised that you don't know this.

    It's not surprising given he was schooled in tour matters by Mark O'Meara, another notoriously mean man. This guy sacked his caddy (Jerry Higginbottom?) 'cause he didn't want to pay a caddy 10% and publicly sought to be paid for playing in the Ryder Cup. He was also part of the fourball that my buddy played in and their carry on (Woods and O'Meara) was unreal apparently).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    is your buddy JP McManus or Denis O'Brien or something? Who the **** gets to have a round with Woods and O'Meara?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 442 ✭✭Jack Kyle


    is your buddy JP McManus or Denis O'Brien or something? Who the **** gets to have a round with Woods and O'Meara?

    Nah...no such luck!

    It was in Isleworth in Florida.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Jack Kyle wrote: »
    Nah...no such luck!

    It was in Isleworth in Florida.

    Nice if you can get it, I suppose.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,469 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Jack Kyle wrote: »
    You're wrong on a number of counts.

    Woods said that there were "a million reasons" why he'd prefer to win a WGC event rather than the Ryder Cup.

    Woods is widely ackowledged as being mean. I'm surprised that you don't know this.

    It's not surprising given he was schooled in tour matters by Mark O'Meara, another notoriously mean man. This guy sacked his caddy (Jerry Higginbottom?) 'cause he didn't want to pay a caddy 10% and publicly sought to be paid for playing in the Ryder Cup. He was also part of the fourball that my buddy played in and their carry on (Woods and O'Meara) was unreal apparently).

    sorry but second-hand hearsay doesn't do it for me.
    I prefer it pure and simple ;-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    I think there is a lazy assumption that the European teams "get on better" and that leads to better performance on the field. I'm not sure I buy into that. There has been enough noise down the years of players not getting on in the European camp, Sergio and Padraig being two big personalities who don't get on.

    They do the same analysis every Ryder Cup as to why Europe "appear" stronger and it is always mentioned that European professionals have played more fourball and foursome events growing up in their youth, which is maybe true, although how relevant I'm not sure.

    I think it's just opinion forming, I don't think there is anything concrete that indicates the why's or whats. It's all about momentum really looking at it, and so many times momentum could ahve easily swung for the US but just didn't. I remember during Faldo's year, feeling Europe got pleasently spanked, encapsulated by Garcia being stomped by Anthony Kim, who from that performance was marked as " the next superstar of golf", and well you know how that went.

    Plus I don't think Tiger's intensity is anything news breaking. I don't buy that it's "in the zone" stuff, just think he isn't that great of a person in comparison to how some others act around fans or their fan interaction. As for how that affects the Us team, surely it's negligible.

    I remmber it being referneced a few tmes by Sky commentary, does the circus around Woods affect the Us team. If that is true in any shape or form ( which I doubt it is) then very simply the problem is an epicly frail mental state for Us golfers :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭PRAF


    TheDoc wrote: »
    I think there is a lazy assumption that the European teams "get on better" and that leads to better performance on the field. I'm not sure I buy into that. There has been enough noise down the years of players not getting on in the European camp, Sergio and Padraig being two big personalities who don't get on.

    They do the same analysis every Ryder Cup as to why Europe "appear" stronger and it is always mentioned that European professionals have played more fourball and foursome events growing up in their youth, which is maybe true, although how relevant I'm not sure.

    I think it's just opinion forming, I don't think there is anything concrete that indicates the why's or whats. It's all about momentum really looking at it, and so many times momentum could ahve easily swung for the US but just didn't. I remember during Faldo's year, feeling Europe got pleasently spanked, encapsulated by Garcia being stomped by Anthony Kim, who from that performance was marked as " the next superstar of golf", and well you know how that went.

    Plus I don't think Tiger's intensity is anything news breaking. I don't buy that it's "in the zone" stuff, just think he isn't that great of a person in comparison to how some others act around fans or their fan interaction. As for how that affects the Us team, surely it's negligible.

    I remmber it being referneced a few tmes by Sky commentary, does the circus around Woods affect the Us team. If that is true in any shape or form ( which I doubt it is) then very simply the problem is an epicly frail mental state for Us golfers :D

    It may be a bit of an assumption to presume that the Europeans get on well together. However, there is at least some truth in it I think. Anecdotally, you hear a lot about how on the Euro tour the pros will eat together, travel together, etc. Doesn't appear to happen as much on the US tour.

    I think another thing the Europeans have done well in over the years is picking the right pairings. From Seve & Olazabal, to Westwood & Clarke, etc.

    However, as you mentioned, lots of these Ryder Cups go right down to the wire and a lucky bounce, or someone holing an outrageous putt, can make all the difference. Who knows, maybe Europe is just a bit luckier these days!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭RikkFlair


    Europe may have won 7 of the last 9 cups but discarding the 2 trouncings handed out in 04 and 06, they have been very close contests - in fact 14.5 to 13.5 in most cases.

    I do remember in the wake of the K Club thrashing there were a few tongue in cheek comments about making it Europe v Rest of World in the future, because it was getting too easy! 2008 sorted that out though.


Advertisement