Who killed more people in the Bible? God or Satan?

ibstar

http://www.religico.com/2009/12/17/who-killed-more-people-in-the-bible-god-or-satan/

This is just.....I don't know why people..............Ughhh
Thank god I'm an Atheist.

Cabaal

ah thats easy explain,

That was during gods teenage years when he/she/it had mood swings all over the shop and really got pissed off about even tiny little things.

Since then he/she/it hit its 30's and is now loving and caring,

...and the reason why satan didn't kill as many people, well...errr....yeah thats...err...gods will and ...err god was protecting people, or something.....

Amirani

Cabaal wrote: »

ah thats easy explain,

That was during gods teenage years when he/she/it had mood swings all over the shop and really got pissed off about even tiny little things.

Since then he/she/it hit its 30's and is now loving and caring,

Yep, he's definitely grown up and matured. He was fairly stupid during the early stages of his omnipotence. Completely ****ed up civilisation and had to re-do the whole thing sure.

He takes a much more hands-off approach these days too.

Cabaal

NiallSparky wrote: »

He takes a much more hands-off approach these days too.

Yeah thats for sure,
Years ago he had no problem killing entire countrys/army's when they tried to invade citys etc.

These days, ah sure if somebody wants to kill 6million of his people...ah, he feels its best not get involved.

But he is still loving and caring, don't forget that.

magicbastarder

Cabaal wrote: »

That was during gods teenage years

don't forget that god is to humans as humans are to dogs when it comes to aging. so while 2500 have passed for humans, only 25 years have passed since then for god.

Cabaal

magicbastarder wrote: »

don't forget that god is to humans as humans are to dogs when it comes to aging. so while 2500 have passed for humans, only 25 years have passed since then for god.

Won't that mean he;ll be dead in say 100 thousand years from now?

Also what about the other few billion years, was he negative age or just a teenager for a very very long time (might explain killing those poor dinosaurs, ice ages etc)

ibstar

Cabaal wrote: »

Won't that mean he;ll be dead in say 100 thousand years from now?

Also what about the other few billion years, was he negative age or just a teenager for a very very long time (might explain killing those poor dinosaurs, ice ages etc)

He was in the process of being made by his God Parents (pun not intended).

eyescreamcone

If god made everything, didn't he also make Satan?

So Satan's killings can also be attributed to the god.

So ...




Pssst. It's all bullsh1t!

Cabaal

eyescreamcone wrote: »

If god made everything, didn't he also make Satan?

Yep, god made satan
which means god is the cause of all evil and bad in the world....apparently.

It also means that if god created satan, god could destroy satan with a thought. If of course god can't and god must battle satan then this means god is certainly not all powerful.

iDave

Context people...context

tricky D

NiallSparky wrote: »

Yep, he's definitely grown up and matured. He was fairly stupid during the early stages of his omnipotence. Completely ****ed up civilisation and had to re-do the whole thing sure.

He takes a much more hands-off approach these days too.

Book spoiler:

He's gonna kill almost everybody in the last few chapters.

PopePalpatine

tricky D wrote: »

Book spoiler:

He's gonna kill almost everybody in the last few chapters.

So God is George R. R. Martin? :pac:

endacl

Neither.

Oranage2

Its threads like these most people think atheists are just annoying rebellious teenagers :rolleyes:

magicbastarder

eyescreamcone wrote: »

If god made everything, didn't he also make Satan?

he had a good marketing adviser; product differentiation. create an illusion of choice in the market.

Duggy747

70's / 80's / early 90's heavy metal was seen as Satan's music.

He had good taste :pac:

endacl

Oranage2 wrote: »

Its threads like these most people think atheists are just annoying rebellious teenagers :rolleyes:

Rebellious teenagers who can form coherent sentences though!

Cabaal

Oranage2 wrote: »

Its threads like these most people think atheists are just annoying rebellious teenagers :rolleyes:

pfft its Friday,

How is rambling about a teenage deity any more silly then claiming everything in the bible is factual, true and actually happened?

gaynorvader

Oranage2 wrote: »

Its threads like these most people think atheists are just annoying rebellious teenagers :rolleyes:

This isn't quite English, but I do get your meaning (I think). If people are willing to base their thoughts of a (very loose) group people based on one thread in a public forum, they probably have deeper issues with separating fact from fiction than most...which is interesting.

Absoluvely

I would just like to point out that this bar chart is not to scale.

Yellow121

I don't know who's worse, religious nut jobs or atheist nut jobs.

Doctor Strange

PopePalpatine wrote: »

So God is George R. R. Martin? :pac:

You mean Joss Whedon is God

Cabaal

Yellow121 wrote: »

I don't know who's worse, religious nut jobs or atheist nut jobs.

Massive difference between a nut job and people having a laugh at the massive inaccuracies in a book that some people take as fact,

If somebody thought starwars actually happened, would you call somebody critical of this belief who pointed out the error's in this belief a nutjob?

Yellow121

Cabaal wrote: »

Massive difference between a nut job and people having a laugh at the massive inaccuracies in a book that some people take as fact,

If somebody thought starwars actually happened, would you call somebody critical of this belief who pointed out the error's in this belief a nutjob?

Wasn't talking about this thread specifically. Many atheists try to shove their opinions down people's throats just as much as some religious people they criticise.

gaynorvader

Cabaal wrote: »

Massive difference between a nut job and people having a laugh at the massive inaccuracies in a book that some people take as fact,

If somebody thought starwars actually happened, would you call somebody critical of this belief who pointed out the error's in this belief a nutjob?

Depends on who (s)he's referring to as nutjobs. Maybe they are speaking in general terms in which case I'd have to say it depends on the nutjob, plenty of annoying nutjobs on both sides of the fence.

Sarky

Yellow121 wrote: »

Wasn't talking about this thread specifically. Many atheists try to shove their opinions down people's throats just as much as some religious people they criticise.

Congratulations on finding a way to manage to sneer at both.

Jimmy444

Absoluvely wrote: »

I would just like to point out that this bar chart is not to scale.

I'd also like to point out that it contains a spelling error (in BIG LETTERS) - another shocking truth revealed:rolleyes:

Oranage2

gaynorvader wrote: »

This isn't quite English, but I do get your meaning (I think). If people are willing to base their thoughts of a (very loose) group people based on one thread in a public forum, they probably have deeper issues with separating fact from fiction than most...which is interesting.

well if you can't fully understand that sentence then guess you're not as smart as you think.

Cabaal wrote: »

Massive difference between a nut job and people having a laugh at the massive inaccuracies in a book that some people take as fact,

If somebody thought starwars actually happened, would you call somebody critical of this belief who pointed out the error's in this belief a nutjob?

Having a laugh? I laughed at one post before I posted, hardly a Monthy python skit is this thread.