Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Massey ferguson 3000 series

  • 07-08-2013 9:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭


    Does anyone have any experience on the mf 3000 series. I'm not looking for one , but have noticed a few on done deal, eg 3125, 3120 3095. I was thinking that a older 6 cylinder ticking over wud be easier on juice than a 3 or 4 cylinder working harder, or am I wrong .


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MFdaveIreland


    Does anyone have any experience on the mf 3000 series. I'm not looking for one , but have noticed a few on done deal, eg 3125, 3120 3095. I was thinking that a older 6 cylinder ticking over wud be easier on juice than a 3 or 4 cylinder working harder, or am I wrong .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭crackcrack30


    I know they can be got a good deal cheaper than other series......what work do u have in mind for it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MFdaveIreland


    Yes, i have noticed that they are slowly reducing in value. Just wondering was there a catch with them. Have 2 MF 165s, but will possibly need something in the future fit to lift and transport silage bales, possibly slurry spreading. Not a major neccessity , but i would imagine that heavy silage bales will be doing a bit of damage to a mf 165, and was thinking of possibly changing sometime to something more powerful as reasonable money. I was thinking that would it be possible to have overkill regards power and size rather than strugglin with a small machine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭himwdah


    i was once afraid of them but have no fear of them now after a 3125 which is now replaced with a 6180, good value for the spec. however i have learned that they dont like sitting up over the winter as some of the connections get corroded and can be a pain to find, if u go ahead with it make sure u have a house for it and get a dynashift if u can.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MFdaveIreland


    himwdah wrote: »
    i was once afraid of them but have no fear of them now after a 3125 which is now replaced with a 6180, good value for the spec. however i have learned that they dont like sitting up over the winter as some of the connections get corroded and can be a pain to find, if u go ahead with it make sure u have a house for it and get a dynashift if u can.

    What were u using yours for,was it hard on diesel and did it give much trouble,


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭himwdah


    3125 was no problem after the brakes were done on the second day we had it, cauught in time. would still be here if a van driver could drive- wrote off. closet to replace the 3125 was a 6180, no probs really with 7500hrs, 2500 which r us, only thing is the shuttle is getting new scyros tomorrw, but i would expect that as it was our general yard tractor, and used for road work, roundbaling(3-4000 bales year), mowing, harvester, discing, slurry mixing and drawing, drawing silage, hedgecuting, etc same with 3125 but it only had 12000hrs on it when we bought it:rolleyes:, needed the hp as 399 wasnt on top of the job. would deffinatly have another 3125 possibly before a 6180, but both good, have had small wiring faulst with the 3125 being parked up outside the first winter-damp and corrosion, but not when we decided to use it for all yard work which means at least 800hrs a year.

    the 6180 is getting the gearbox fixed as we have no plans to replace it as there is nothing id rather bale or mow with most of the time, valmet nicer on mower but normally bros and dad tractor, mine is 6180 for baling, hrs arent much of an issue it seems i i dont worry much about them with the dyna gearbox.

    only three tractor on our yard to stay, valmet, mf 6180 and mf390, irreplacable by anything newer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭nashmach


    Probably two key considerations.

    Have you a good MF mechanic/dealer nearby who knows these?

    Are you reasonably handy with electronics yourself?

    These were more of a tillage tractor to be fair than a livestock tractor. Some lads swear by them but perhaps the residuals say more.

    In your situation, would an older 390 or 398 be better with the 3 stick box - they seem to have come down in price lately and would be a tractor for life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭himwdah


    nashmach wrote: »
    Probably two key considerations.

    Have you a good MF mechanic/dealer nearby who knows these?

    Are you reasonably handy with electronics yourself?

    These were more of a tillage tractor to be fair than a livestock tractor. Some lads swear by them but perhaps the residuals say more.

    In your situation, would an older 390 or 398 be better with the 3 stick box - they seem to have come down in price lately and would be a tractor for life.

    u would think that nash as i used to but have to say the 3000 is easier to work on as the 300 series wear out quite quick and can be awkward to fix but r a very good no frills farm machine, the 390 we have was fully rebuilt between 7 and 8000hrs, our old 399 though is still going strong at 9000hrs and no spanners other than clutch from 4000hrs, just the 3000series seem a better built tractor for heavy work but electrics is the worst of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MFdaveIreland


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by nashmach
    Probably two key considerations.

    Have you a good MF mechanic/dealer nearby who knows these?

    Are you reasonably handy with electronics yourself?

    These were more of a tillage tractor to be fair than a livestock tractor. Some lads swear by them but perhaps the residuals say more.

    In your situation, would an older 390 or 398 be better with the 3 stick box - they seem to have come down in price lately and would be a tractor for life.



    Lads interesting points, regards the 300 series, very high residual prices, in my opinion not worth what they are selling for, 12-13k etc, not easy for a MF fan to say either. A sense of reality is required with some of these models, and i just dont think that the 300 series is all that people claim. I have had experience before with a mf 398 with terrible shuttle problems, to the point where it was blind luck wether you could back and forth.

    I must say that i liked the fact that even the smallest of the 3000 series were relatively high spec in comparison to others, but as nashmach has said, the 300 series are definately a no-frills stockmans tractor. what would you suggest as a possible MF upgrade from a mf 165 with relative mod-cons and sufficient lift and pulling power. I think that after the 3000 series they didnt get any more advanced so to speak, and dont see any reason for looking past them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MFdaveIreland


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by nashmach
    Probably two key considerations.

    Have you a good MF mechanic/dealer nearby who knows these?

    Are you reasonably handy with electronics yourself?

    These were more of a tillage tractor to be fair than a livestock tractor. Some lads swear by them but perhaps the residuals say more.

    In your situation, would an older 390 or 398 be better with the 3 stick box - they seem to have come down in price lately and would be a tractor for life.



    Lads interesting points, regards the 300 series, very high residual prices, in my opinion not worth what they are selling for, 12-13k etc, not easy for a MF fan to say either. A sense of reality is required with some of these models, and i just dont think that the 300 series is all that people claim. I have had experience before with a mf 398 with terrible shuttle problems, to the point where it was blind luck wether you could back and forth.

    I must say that i liked the fact that even the smallest of the 3000 series were relatively high spec in comparison to others, but as nashmach has said, the 300 series are definately a no-frills stockmans tractor. what would you suggest as a possible MF upgrade from a mf 165 with relative mod-cons and sufficient lift and pulling power. I think that after the 3000 series they didnt get any more advanced so to speak, and dont see any reason for looking past them.[/


    Any more opinions???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭himwdah


    landini legend!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭MFdaveIreland


    himwdah wrote: »
    landini legend!

    Wouldn't be up for one of them, reliability??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭nashmach


    Wouldn't be up for one of them, reliability??

    Bombproof especially in Techno spec.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 171 ✭✭Going forward...


    Techno as in they say no to technology?

    To use your own words against you about your beloved Landini, perhaps the residuals say more.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭nashmach


    Techno as in they say no to technology?

    To use your own words against you about your beloved Landini, perhaps the residuals say more.:pac:

    Top is the high specification, Techno is the basic specification.

    And yes residuals show it in this case.

    There are several of those in this area with over 15k hours and still going strong on loader work and spreading lime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭himwdah


    if rh op thinks a bigger massey that would be on top of the work load would be better for him yet the 3000 series might be to much electrical trouble, landini would be the next value tractor with the same perkins engine and a basic no hassle set up with a fair good rep from contractors.

    perhaps i an wrong but i did say legend, and i wouldnt mind one of them for back up, long before any other brand


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 875 ✭✭✭f140


    himwdah wrote: »
    if rh op thinks a bigger massey that would be on top of the work load would be better for him yet the 3000 series might be to much electrical trouble, landini would be the next value tractor with the same perkins engine and a basic no hassle set up with a fair good rep from contractors.

    perhaps i an wrong but i did say legend, and i wouldnt mind one of them for back up, long before any other brand

    I heard from my mechanic that actually in reality the electronics are bullet proof its just the 32 speed gearbox that gives the problems but is sorted when a 16 speed box is fitted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭himwdah


    f140 wrote: »
    I heard from my mechanic that actually in reality the electronics are bullet proof its just the 32 speed gearbox that gives the problems but is sorted when a 16 speed box is fitted.

    i find the 3125 and 6180 ok but electics can be hard to track down if it has a broken wire but correded connections are most common with the faults and connections r general knowledge of most mf mechanics.


Advertisement