Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Problem scanning prints?

  • 23-07-2013 10:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭


    So I took some photos on an old Fed 5c film camera and got the prints back today.

    I'm trying to scan the prints at home (to avoid paying extra to scan the negatives professionally - already paid 50 euro for the prints) but I'm getting some weird distortions on the scanned image which isn't there at all in the print.

    Anyone have any idea what's going on here?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭janja93


    The grey areas around the sky being the problem by the way. And I'm fairly certain it's not dirt on either the print or the scanner itself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,717 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    is the scanner glass damp ? Looks like the print is sticking to it in places.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭janja93


    Don't think that's it, I've gone over it with a microfibre cloth numerous times now.
    I tried another print in it and the same thing is appearing so it must be some invisible, unwipeable residue on the glass, or could it be anything else?
    I'd try some lens cleaning solution on it but I can't find it, very frustrating!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,302 ✭✭✭Heebie


    That is the glossy finish of the print coupled with tiny bits of moisture. Microdroplets that you can't even see will do that. If you have a big plastic bin, big enough to put the scanner and the prints in, and a bunch of big silica gel packets to throw in with it, you could put them all together in the plastic bin for a week, then take them out & scan the photos relatively quickly before the damp Irish air gets back into them.
    If you have an air-conditioned space to use, that would help too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭janja93


    Ah, thanks a lot for the advice!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭amdgilmore


    If you're going to make a habit of using film, I'd suggest picking up something like a Canoscan 9000 to scan your negs. It's pretty decent for a flatbed scanner.

    Only €160 at the moment, because the MKII just came out (they're technically identical, but the MKII comes with different software).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,302 ✭✭✭Heebie


    The Epson V500 Photo is good for both prints and film. It's highly recommended by a few folks on here. (including me.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 Caxton


    I've encountered this problem often in the past on a Reprographic camera, reducing the pressure between the gloss surface and the glass will resolve the problem. Not sure how easy this is with your scanner however if you place strips of paper just thicker than the photo print, around the edges of the print this may resolve your problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭upaho


    When negatives are printed the dynamic range is fixed to what can be reflected off the paper. This in nothing compared to the dynamic range of the negs themselves. If you stick with the negs themselves you have a potential of much better quality result. (they're made to be printed not scanned) If you want the best quality film result shoot tranny or ....... go digital.

    The problem with the prints is most likely damp and caused by the surface tension between the two glossy surface's. You could try desiccating both, reducing the humidity or having your prints made on matt paper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,302 ✭✭✭Heebie


    If you get your photos printed on matte paper, choose one that doesn't have a super-bumpy surface. Some places offer glossy, matte, and "lustre" and some actually call the "lustre" matte. Matte generally scans OK unless you have a ridiculously high resolution scanner. Lustre tends to scan very poorly, because it has little bumps all over it, but still has a glossy finish, and this tends to add lots of weird distortions due to reflection of light from the scanner through all the little bumps and valleys.
    If you can scan from negatives, as someone else said, you should. (transmissive scanning is much more sensitive than reflective, generally, and has a significantly wider dynamic range.)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement