Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

WAB

  • 19-07-2013 9:47am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 323 ✭✭


    Why isn't there a version of CAB for Welfare Fraud?

    I know there is a few fraud officers but not only are they overwhelmed, they also are relatively known in rural locations

    Quite an amount of crime is carried out by long term welfare claimants

    I know that Gardai know the usual suspects but do not have the time to carry out a full operation on these people. They also are not directly linked to the Social Welfare or Revenue Data Bases

    Some are longstanding criminals who are on every welfare option there is and many are feared by welfare officers

    Many of these people have been on long term benefits but there is no system like CAB to investigate them deeply and their means.

    Why is it that Self employed for example are always in fear of a Revenue Audit but there is no fear on Welfare cheats especially criminal ones

    Why is there no Criminal Assets Bureau for Welfare cheats especially criminal ones. We need a large squad who can come into a town where their identity is not known, where they can unannounced look at what assets people have, their bank accounts, where they travel etc and ask questions like a revenue audit would?

    Why not? If a business can have to show their income and upkeep why not welfare


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Cody Pomeray


    The sort of obvious reason might be that this is unlike other cases of fraud - e.g. corporate fraud - which tends to be perpetrated between two private firms or individuals. This type of fraud involves a state actor granting or rejecting applications that come before it.

    If you want to stamp out that sort of fraud, it sounds more sensible that you do it at source.

    It's a bit like asking why we don't have Gardaí sort of routinely investigating false submissions made to Gardaí.

    Should we not just emphasize that the investigating Gardaí just do their own job properly instead of hiring A-Team type babysitters? I don't think we need any greater social welfare 'A-Team' than the one we already have, to whatever extent it exists. Surely it's a more sensible to nip fraud in the bud than to try and chase it up the trees and down bothríní in every parish on the island.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I'm guessing the cost/benefit simply isn't there.

    Government departments aren't cheap to create, operate or provide pensions for. I vaguely remember a UK campaign to crack down on welfare fraud that ended up costing multiples of what it saved.


Advertisement