Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

u-values on aluminium

  • 27-06-2013 8:58am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25


    I am pricing aluminium windows at the moment for our build.

    Company A has told me that their aluminium windows (with thermal gap) have a u-value of 1.8 (compared to their PVC with 1.2). They also have special passive-standard aluminium windows which have a pvc sandwich in the frame, with frame thickness of 90mm. These are more expensive however.

    Company B, a much smaller company has told me that their aluminium and PVC windows both have u-values of 1.1 . They didn't give any details of how they get the aluminium window u-values so low, and there is nothing on their website about any fancy technology in their aluminium frames. Am I right to be a bit suspicious of this?!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    middling wrote: »
    I am pricing aluminium windows at the moment for our build.

    Company A has told me that their aluminium windows (with thermal gap) have a u-value of 1.8 (compared to their PVC with 1.2). They also have special passive-standard aluminium windows which have a pvc sandwich in the frame, with frame thickness of 90mm. These are more expensive however.

    Company B, a much smaller company has told me that their aluminium and PVC windows both have u-values of 1.1 . They didn't give any details of how they get the aluminium window u-values so low, and there is nothing on their website about any fancy technology in their aluminium frames. Am I right to be a bit suspicious of this?!

    Perhaps Co. B are confusing the U Value of the glass.
    Soft Coat, Low E glass has a U value of 1.1, with Argon Gas, so if they use the same glass in both frames, they might assume, wrongly, that the windows have the same U value.

    More Research


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 middling


    Hmm, that's a good point, thanks. You'd think a window company would know the difference though wouldn't you?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    middling wrote: »
    Hmm, that's a good point, thanks. You'd think a window company would know the difference though wouldn't you?!

    They probably do, its the customer who does not know the difference, they are looking out for.;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 middling


    Yes, you are right! I will query it and see if it gets me anywhere!


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 10,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭BryanF


    middling wrote: »
    I am pricing aluminium windows at the moment for our build.

    Company A has told me that their aluminium windows (with thermal gap) have a u-value of 1.8 (compared to their PVC with 1.2). They also have special passive-standard aluminium windows which have a pvc sandwich in the frame, with frame thickness of 90mm. These are more expensive however.

    Company B, a much smaller company has told me that their aluminium and PVC windows both have u-values of 1.1 . They didn't give any details of how they get the aluminium window u-values so low, and there is nothing on their website about any fancy technology in their aluminium frames. Am I right to be a bit suspicious of this?!

    company A - can not be trusted

    taken from the current building regulations:

    'the replacement of external doors, windows, or rooflights in an existing building.
    The average U-value of replacement units
    should not exceed the value of 1.6 W/m2K'http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/DevelopmentandHousing/BuildingStandards/FileDownLoad,27316,en.pdf


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 middling


    Hi BryanF,
    Sorry only seeing your reply now. Why do you say company A cannot be trusted? Their rep did tell me that he thought the 1.8 u-value was not compatible with building regulations. So he was up front in that respect. Is that what you meant?

    On another note, I got back to company B and he admitted that the 1.1 was only for the glass. He said for the full units the pvc would be about 1.3 and the aluminium about 1.5 . Again, I am still suspicious as he seemed to pick those numbers out of the air and I would have thought the 1.5 for aluminium would require some special technology to make them that low...?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    It would be worth while asking for a copy of the certs for the type of window they are proposing. And then look at the NSAI site for more information: Window Energy Performance Scheme.

    On the linked webpage there's only one company listed as doing Aluminium and acheiving an A3 cert with 1.53 u-value (if I read the cert correctly?!).

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 middling


    Thanks for that I didn't realise this WEP certification scheme existed. I'd agree, on their list it seems like their is only that one company with the aluminium. But there must be lots of companies not registered with them too - company A that I mentioned before say that they have a window type registered to passive standards but they aren't listed here. (I'm not sure who their registration is with then - presume there is a separate passive-standards body....?)


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 10,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭BryanF


    middling wrote: »
    Is that what you meant?

    I would have thought the 1.5 for aluminium would require some special technology to make them that low...?

    yes

    &

    'thermally broken' aluminium windows are common place/the norm and will achieve 1.5w/m2k


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 middling


    Well, company A has thermally broken aluminium windows and they told me they were 1.8 . I don't know - you can't believe a word out of any of them! Am looking at companies C and D now!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement